@DavidSherMD Nice thread. Agree 100% the disease needs a biomarker.
One additional point is that 70 Gy and cis demonstrated 98% 2 yr PFS on HN005.
Is there a PFS decrease that we are willing to accept as a field given the functional morbidity of 70 Gy and salvage options?
@DrSpratticus@CanesDavid I think true meaningful surgery is far in the future for AI / robotics. The professional fees for many operations aren’t actually all that much when weighed against the medical malpractice risk. Semi-autonomous where risk / responsibility falls on the surgeon will be first.
Join promising otolaryngology residents, fellows, and faculty for lectures, workshops, and panels focusing on the keys to research success. Participants will leave motivated and equipped with the tools to achieve success in translational research. https://t.co/ZFER4ePY9o
Come for the critically important data on protons for oropharyngeal cancer, stay for the beautifully written paper.
TORPEdO is out, and it is fascinating and instructive.
I will warn you upfront that this is a long thread, but there is a lot here to discuss!
https://t.co/zvvenb2Zpl
@SprakerMDPhD@HardenedBeam THIS
Rad onc that treats only or mostly H&N is biggest differentiator.
And it’s amazing how much difference there is in toxicity between providers and centers.
@EvanThomas84 Did you read this PLOS ONE paper - or just abstract?
retrospective, not powered to detect a difference, and surgery curve quite a bit higher at 2y. Just because it’s PMID doesn’t mean it’s well done.
This paper actually makes me want to operate on VC more than I did previously.