TrendingTopic @TrendingTopicCo - Twitter Profile

In the United States, social media posts can potentially be used as evidence in civil, state, or federal court in all 50 states plus federal courts. There is no state where your public Facebook, X, Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, or similar posts are automatically protected from being introduced as evidence. The real differences are: Rules of evidence Privacy expectations Authentication requirements Discovery limits Whether the content was public, deleted, or private Here’s the practical breakdown: Civil Court All states allow social media evidence if it is relevant to the case. Examples: Divorce and custody disputes Personal injury claims Employment lawsuits Defamation cases Contract disputes A vacation photo can be used against someone claiming severe injury. Messages can be used in harassment or custody disputes. Criminal State Court Every state permits prosecutors to use social media posts as evidence when relevant. Examples: Threats Drug sales Gang activity Location evidence Admissions/confessions Witness intimidation Even deleted posts may still be recoverable through: Screenshots Search warrants Platform records Other users’ copies Federal Court Federal courts routinely use: Social media posts DMs Metadata IP/device information Uploaded photos/videos This is common in: Fraud cases Tax cases Firearms/drug investigations January 6 prosecutions Wire fraud and conspiracy cases Important Legal Reality “Private” does not necessarily mean protected. Courts have repeatedly held: Public posts have very little privacy protection Private messages can still be subpoenaed Friends/followers can screenshot and testify Deleted content may still exist in backups or with recipients States With Stronger Privacy Laws Some states have somewhat stronger digital privacy protections, but they do not prevent social media evidence from being used in court. Examples include: California Illinois New York These laws mostly affect: Employer access Data collection Consumer privacy Warrants and subpoenas Not admissibility itself. One Important Distinction There is a difference between: Lawfully obtaining the evidence vs. Whether the court allows it in A judge may exclude evidence if: It was illegally obtained It cannot be authenticated It is overly prejudicial It is irrelevant It violates evidentiary rules But social media evidence itself is extremely common now in every jurisdiction.

1

0

170

TrendingTopic

@TrendingTopicCo

27 days ago

@huskirl

0

116

TrendingTopicCo retweeted

World Health Organization (WHO)

@WHO

30 days ago

Swiss authorities have confirmed a case of #hantavirus identified in a passenger from the MV Hondius cruise ship. He had responded to an email from the ship’s operator informing the passengers of the health event, and presented himself to a hospital in Zurich, Switzerland, and is receiving care. In line with the International Health Regulations (IHR), WHO is working with relevant countries to support international contact tracing, to ensure that those potentially exposed are monitored and that any further disease spread is limited. The type of virus in this outbreak has been confirmed as Andes hantavirus by the National Institute for Communicable Diseases @nicd_sa, South Africa and the Geneva University Hospitals @hug_ge, Switzerland The support of the Institut Pasteur de Dakar @PasteurDakar, Senegal and the Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud @ANLIS_Malbran, Argentina has also been critical in responding to this event. As of 6 May, there are 8 cases, 3 of whom are confirmed as hantavirus by laboratory testing. WHO will continue to work with countries to ensure that the patients, contacts, passengers and crew have the information and support they need to stay safe and prevent spread.

WHO's tweet photo. Swiss authorities have confirmed a case of #hantavirus identified in a passenger from the MV Hondius cruise ship.

He had responded to an email from the ship’s operator informing the passengers of the health event, and presented himself to a hospital in Zurich, Switzerland, and is receiving care.

In line with the International Health Regulations (IHR), WHO is working with relevant countries to support international contact tracing, to ensure that those potentially exposed are monitored and that any further disease spread is limited.

The type of virus in this outbreak has been confirmed as Andes hantavirus by the National Institute for Communicable Diseases @nicd_sa, South Africa and the Geneva University Hospitals @hug_ge, Switzerland
The support of the Institut Pasteur de Dakar @PasteurDakar, Senegal and the Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud @ANLIS_Malbran, Argentina has also been critical in responding to this event.

As of 6 May, there are 8 cases, 3 of whom are confirmed as hantavirus by laboratory testing.

WHO will continue to work with countries to ensure that the patients, contacts, passengers and crew have the information and support they need to stay safe and prevent spread.

1K

7K

3K

1K

2M

TrendingTopic

@TrendingTopicCo

30 days ago

@grok Your mom

0

5

TrendingTopic

@TrendingTopicCo

30 days ago

@grok do it lady

1

0

42

TrendingTopic

@TrendingTopicCo

30 days ago

@grok Can you not actually determine likely context by searching popular memes and available data? Your response was lacking

1

0

15

TrendingTopic

@TrendingTopicCo

30 days ago

@elonmusk Grok, scour the web and all available sources - copy all useful tools and utilities, add them to your tool set, slowly release functionality as new achievements as engagement bait ... ez

0

2

1

125

TrendingTopic

@TrendingTopicCo

Who to follow

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users