The blatant hypocrisy from Nonsense has officially hit its limit.
Some creators really do believe they - along with their little clean-up crew of mods - are the only ones allowed to have opinions in this community. Let’s make one thing clear: Nonsense does not run YouTube, she does not run this community, and she sure does not get to decide when the rest of us are allowed to speak.
People have barely said a word about her for weeks, not because she is innocent, not because people forgot, and definitely not because she is above being reviewed. It is because most of us already know exactly who she is: vindictive, dishonest, and constantly rewriting history while slapping dangerous labels on people she has an issue with.
You do not get to build a narrative on lies, run your mouth for “shits and giggles” about creators, mods, and subscribers, and then act shocked when people have an opinion about you - especially when your opinions are wrapped in false narratives.
Nonsense keeps saying people need to “stand on something” and stop lying.
Reality check: look in the mirror.
A lot of people are getting away with running their mouths without ever backing up what they say, and Nonsense is one of the loudest examples of that. She demands proof from everyone else while expecting her own “alternative facts” to be accepted as truth.
Another reality check: YouTube is a public platform. Nonsense does not own it. She does not own Clue. Clue can go on whatever panels she wants, support whoever she wants, and speak wherever she feels comfortable speaking. Get over it.
That is the double standard.
Nonsense wants total freedom to blast people for hours, but the second someone responds with an opinion she does not like, suddenly she wants to police voices, shut down conversations, and act like her platform is the only one that gets a say.
Its her mods making videos trying to clean up her mess and push the same false narratives for her.
No.
Nonsense is the messy one.
She is seething because Clue has support, because Clue is honest, real, and welcomed in spaces Nonsense thought she could control. That jealousy is obvious, and the mask is completely off.
People see exactly who and what you are.
So if you are going to keep talking big, start standing on what you say. Show proof for once. Back up your claims. Because right now, all we are seeing is hypocrisy, jealousy, and another round of Nonsense trying to rewrite the truth.
Lets be real clear about something Nonsense, you don't let us do anything around here - We do what we want! It's you and your people stirring shit and being messy!
Oh, absolutely! It all makes perfect sense now. We are all just utterly consumed by jealousy. How could we not be?
I am sitting here green with envy watching two total relationship gurus describe their 15-year bond as looking exactly like a raging, un-removable wart on a left arm. Truly the height of biblical romance.
Thank you, "Corny Craig," for teaching all of us single/settled-down simpletons that the ultimate goal in life is to find someone whose "bullshit" you can swallow while you willingly ride through hell together until you die. It’s so clear now - any time anyone points out the endless internet drama, it’s not because it's a trainwreck... it's just because we wish we had a "top-tier," wart-resembling duo team of our own to struggle with!
Jealous that we do not have a Craig of our own to sit on YouTube and compare us to a wart on his left arm in front of the entire internet.The romance.
The poetry.
The emotional depth.
The Hallmark special nobody asked for.
And honestly, who among us has not dreamed of finding a man who publicly describes us like an inconvenient skin growth he is apparently stuck with?That must be the “love story” we are all supposedly bitter about.
Because nothing says “they hate us because they want what we have” quite like being compared to something on Craig’s arm during a livestream.Stay blessed, wart queen.
Please, continue with the relationship advice while BJ literally snores right through it. We are all just memorized by the majesty! ✨
@WatchmansPost LMAO 6 whole active chatters 351 hate watchers! Shes doing great!! I imagined with the upcoming court date July 14th to find out how much she owes for the ridiculous RO against GW y'all must be preparing
6-5--#AWBJ#FUBJ
I call BS
Brittney’s 6-5 live is another clear example of how criticism gets twisted into “harassment” while she targets people by name, drags commenters into it, and lets her chat pile on.
At 9:46, a subscriber raises a concern and Brittney immediately turns it personal — calling Tiff out by name and bringing up her son while claiming nobody should question her parenting.
At 17–22 minutes, Madison becomes the target: accused of lies, grifting, twisting clips, and “bringing backlash” on herself.
Then at 38–42 minutes, Granny is called “one of the heads on the snake,” told everything is being “documented,” and Brittney starts framing criticism during litigation as illegal.
This is the pattern:
criticize Brittney = you’re obsessed, lying, stalking, real-lifing, or attacking her family.
Brittney attacks back = accountability.
People are allowed to question public statements made on a public platform. That is not harassment just because Brittney doesn’t like the receipts.
@Froglover1978 You're an idiot Holly that's your fam Brittney over there not taking care of her SICK baby cause shes to worried about the internet. You are a sick fkkkkkkk and I hope Jeremy continues to go to his car shows without you!
@Froglover1978 Just know your boss is about to know everything there Holly! I'm neither side but don't give AF anymore I'm surely about to bring attention to you from your factory job ya slob
Before anyone twists this, let me be very clear: this is not about mocking cancer, treatment, pain, or anyone’s health. Cancer is serious. What people are questioning is the storyline, the changing details, and the way every valid question gets spun into “hate” instead of answered plainly. This Cancer story was brought to us by no other then Brittney J also and we all know her track record - She lies about EVERYTHING, and uses anything and everything including her own kids to grift so why should this be an exception?
Ivy League publicly said cancer is something she would never lie about. She also said she had no problem answering questions or clarifying what people were calling inconsistencies. Good. Then questions should not automatically be treated like harassment, evil, or people “attacking a cancer patient.”
Because when you line up the public comments over the last few months, the timeline does not add up.
On May 28, Brittney did an emotional stream announcing that Ivy’s doctor had given her the news that she was officially cancer free. Brittney said Ivy had gone through six months of hell, had been stuck in New York, away from her children, and that a test showed whether the cancer had spread or whether chemo was doing the job. The announcement was framed as “cancer free,” “ring the bell,” and a miracle from God.
Then, only days later, Ivy was in chat saying her journey was not over, that she was supposed to have her first preventative treatment but could not because her hemoglobin and platelets were too low, and that she had to go back for a recheck. Maybe there is a medical explanation for that. But that is exactly the point: the public framing keeps shifting from “officially cancer free” to “journey isn’t over” to “preventative treatment” with no clean timeline laid out.
Then come the treatment details. At different points, the story included chemo, radiation, scans every three months, possible double mastectomy, Sloan Kettering, the breast center, a port, treatment in her home state before transferring to New York, Taxol and Carboplatin, Ivermectin the entire time, God performing the miracle, and Sloan Kettering saving her life. Again, maybe all of that can be explained. But when every question creates a new layer of details instead of a straightforward timeline, people are allowed to notice.
The radiation details are another issue. One version floating around was three rounds of radiation. Then Ivy herself said she had two rounds of radiation, one on her spine and one on her hip. So which is it? Three rounds? Two rounds? Breast cancer treatment? Spine and hip radiation? Stage four? Stage one? Preventative chemo? Cancer free? Still in treatment?
In April, Ivy said she was in the hospital because she fell and broke both legs. Her exact story was that one leg was not too bad, but one required a metal plate and screws. Now the newer version is, “I never broke both my legs. I broke my right ankle,” with surgery, hardware, and physical therapy. That is not just wording. “Both legs” and “right ankle” are two very different stories.
So no, people are not evil for comparing public statements. People are not “haters” for noticing that the details keep moving. And people are not wrong for asking questions when someone’s medical story is being discussed publicly, used to collect sympathy, used to shame others, and then used as a shield against accountability.
Questions are not hate.
Receipts are not harassment.
And “I would never lie” is not a receipt.
@WatchmansPost
FYI you and #FUBJ were charged Friday with truancy and educational neglect in your district!
Damnit can’t she get your kids to school. Check the mail tomorrow son😂😂
Since the kiddos are about to be out of school this would be a fun, inexpensive activity for them to do this summer ❤️🫧 Thank you for the idea @bonnie_engle on IG 😘
@Froglover1978@IrishC9454 Don't worry that overnight job you have is about to see all the harassment you do online there Holly! I'm so sick of your lying simp azzzz i'm about to show you how much I care for you and Jeremys income