@TomasBogardus@resistancemoney Hello Mr Bogardus, I hope you’re in good health. I was wondering if you’ve had a chance to see this https://t.co/wjywINYpKe
Hello Mr Bogardus!! @TomasBogardus just watched your debate with Mae Bettcher & think it a fantastic and informative discussion. The channel it was on reminded me of this debate from more than a month ago. I was wondering if you’ve had a chance to see it & might have any thoughts
Hello Mr Bogardus!! @TomasBogardus just watched your debate with Mae Bettcher & think it a fantastic and informative discussion. The channel it was on reminded me of this debate from more than a month ago. I was wondering if you’ve had a chance to see it & might have any thoughts
@TomasBogardus Thank you. I’d also like to know what your thoughts are on this recent debate on moral realism vs anti realism between what might be the heavyweight philosophers on both sides, and it got heated at times. Please share your thoughts if you end up watching https://t.co/90CtNjd9Xq
@Celo2308@TomasBogardus For a while Mr Wright, Hilton et all would talk of sexes in terms of reproductive structures “organized around the production of..” & Mr Bogardus kind of popularized the “function of producing” talk. I do wonder if there’s specific issues he has with the “organized around” stuff
@adorientem@BlueRepublik What about the protectionist economics, the anti trans inclusive social policies, a foreign policy that has most of his terms been isolationist, the focus on national sovereignty, independence and anti “mass” migration policies with strict enforcement of the border security etc
@goingawoll@Philip_Goff I’m curious what your best case for moral realism is. Or what the most convincing evidence is that persuades you that it’s more plausible than anti realism. I ask because I’ve seen your aware of and have interacted with moral anti realists like Lance Bush and so know those args
@buttonslives@HarfangDneiges@magicinthealps@RationalBlonde Would you have a conversation with @JDaviesPhD on this? He’s been working on the topic (written multiple well researched books involving it) for a long time and is about as expert as anyone can get. Unfortunately him and his work are criminally little known.
@dannyphiltalk Then please debate someone who no one can claim isn’t academically or intellectually qualified, Dr Christopher Tomaszewski. You guys had a brief argument on the trinity but it was cut very short because it was a 2v2 debate
@dannyphiltalk@GodLogic_GL@mohammed_hijab CC: @adorientem , can I ask Mr Tomaszewski if ur arguments in favor of the logic of the trinity are posted anywhere in writing? Because you’ve mentioned there are two routes (relative identity etc), both of which you’re fine defending but theres not usually time to flesh them out
@dannyphiltalk@GodLogic_GL@mohammed_hijab I remember you suggested having another conversation with Dr. Christopher Tomaszewski on the Trinity here https://t.co/6wqmSnD3S8 Can I ask if this discussion might still be happening? It seemed he was the first to address your objections directly in a debate but it was cut short
@ClarkeMicah As you have previously said of knowledge and belief: “The two are wholly different. Belief, almost certainly driven by desire, is a supposition about matters you do not and in many cases cannot know. Knowledge is a compulsory acknowledgement of demonstrable truth.” How about now?