The NATO-backed coup in Ukraine was on February 22, 2014. In the article below, the New York Times confirms that two days later, on February 24, the new Ukrainian intelligence chief of the government that the US had handpicked, called the CIA and MI6 to establish a partnership against Russia. Only a few days earlier, Russia had been the main security partner of Ukraine - after the coup, it would become NATO's frontline state against Russia.
The CIA operation against Russia developed from 2014-2022:
- "12 newly-built, forward operating bases constructed along the Russian border. From each base, General Kondratiuk said, the Ukrainian officers ran networks of agents who gathered intelligence inside Russia. C.I.A. officers installed equipment at the bases to help gather intelligence and also identified some of the most skilled Ukrainian graduates of the Operation Goldfish program, working with them to approach potential Russian sources."
- "The listening post in the Ukrainian forest is part of a C.I.A.-supported network of spy bases constructed in the past eight years that includes 12 secret locations along the Russian border... Around 2016, the C.I.A. began training an elite Ukrainian commando force — known as Unit 2245 — which captured Russian drones and communications gear so that C.I.A. technicians could reverse-engineer them and crack Moscow’s encryption systems.
The CIA/MI6 presence in Ukraine became a key motivation for the Russian invasion:
- "Toward the end of 2021, according to a senior European official, Mr. Putin was weighing whether to launch his full-scale invasion when he met with the head of one of Russia’s main spy services, who told him that the C.I.A., together with Britain’s MI6, were controlling Ukraine and turning it into a beachhead for operations against Moscow."
*** The war in Ukraine was clearly provoked (and even started) by NATO. The amount of evidence makes this undeniable. However, the political-media establishment defends the "unprovoked invasion" narrative by dismissing and criminalising all explanations of NATO's involvement as efforts to "legitimise" the Russian invasion. Why is NATO's contribution to starting this war important? If we recognise NATO's contribution and the legitimate Russian security concerns, then it opens up an opportunity for compromise and peace. By clinging to the "unprovoked invasion" narrative, weapons are the path to peace, and NATO gets to continue its war against Russia to the last Ukrainian.
https://t.co/gmmWD698bx
Humanity has no idea how much it owes this man. But I will tell you that without him, with a less calm and measured Russian president in Moscow over the past 20 years, someone more corrupt, more nationalistic or more triggered by Western provocation and infiltration attempts, the whole world would have burned already.
The West has been playing with fire like crazy; the fact that this amazingly strong character has been at the center of power in the Global South for an entire generation may have saved humanity from untold disasters.
The fact that we still have a functioning international system, and global economy is only thanks to the quality of leadership in the Global South - Russia and China primarily. If it depended in Western Zionist wanker psychopaths, the whole world would be Gaza already
BREAKING Hawaii names anonymous man "Aloha Ambassador" after he serves tourist a dose of FAFO
"We've all seen the video of the Monk Seal that almost got hit by the rock"
"Some of us have seen the environmental activist, as I like to call him, who took matters into his own hands to educate what might happen if you mess with our land"
Every time NATO bombs a country, the conversation immediately becomes about how terrible that country's leader was.
Milošević. Saddam. Gaddafi. Assad.
The monster is always pre-positioned. Always ready. So you never have to discuss the 78 days of missiles falling on Belgrade.
On bridges. On hospitals. On water treatment plants. On the Chinese embassy. On a television station.
Sixteen journalists killed at their desks. Called "collateral damage" from 15,000 feet.
"Failed communist state."
Yugoslavia had a higher standard of living than most of Eastern Europe. Free movement. Free healthcare. Free education. Western trade relationships. Its own independent foreign policy that defied Moscow.
Not exactly the profile of a failed state.
"Made up of different cultures."
So is Switzerland. So is Belgium. So is the United States, spectacularly so.
Diversity didn't kill Yugoslavia. Western interference, IMF structural adjustment gutting its economy through the 1980s did. And a very deliberate Western strategy of recognizing breakaway republics before any political settlement existed.
Germany recognized Croatia in December 1991. Unilaterally. Against the advice of the UN Secretary General. That recognition was gasoline.
And since we're doing the full history:
Operation Storm, 1995. Croatia ethnically cleansed over 200,000 Serbs from Krajina in days. The largest single ethnic cleansing in Europe since World War II. U.S. operational support. General Wesley Clark helped plan it.
You didn't hear much about it because it was the right kind of ethnic cleansing, conducted by the right kind of people.
NATO didn't bomb Serbia to stop Milosevic. They had cozy relationships with far worse leaders that same decade, in Saudi Arabia, in Egypt, in Indonesia, where the bodies were still warm.
They bombed Serbia because a European country was resisting the architecture of the post-Cold War order, and that required an example.
Same logic as Vietnam. Different accent.
My point was never about whether Yugoslavia was a paradise. It was about power and the ability to respond to power.
Yugoslavia had none. It absorbed 78 days and surrendered.
Iran absorbed 48 hours and made Trump publicly beg China for help.
That's the only comparison I was making.
You can despise Milošević and still recognize that NATO had no UN mandate, no legal authority, and no right to bomb a European capital while calling it "humanitarianism."
Those two things are not in conflict.
🇷🇸 March 24, 1999. The Day NATO Rained Fire on Yugoslavia For 78 days, NATO bombed Yugoslavia without UN approval, dropping over 28,000 bombs, including depleted uranium and cluster munitions.
More than 2,000 civilians were killed, over 250,000 displaced, and the nation’s infrastructure, culture, and soul were systematically shattered.
This is what Western “humanitarian intervention” really looked like.
Never forget. Never forgive. Never NATO.
@Glenn_Diesen This is exactly what NATO did to Serbia in 1999
When they failed to inflict any damage on the Serb army, they resorted to terrorism and started bombing indefensible civilian infrastructure
🧵Thread: Moral Combat NATO At War
After NATO's first ever bombing campaign in 1999, Allan Little takes a challenging look at the reasons for the war in Kosovo, examining why, and how, the West used force to pursue their geo-political goals supporting terrorism in Kosovo Serbia.
NEW: Iconic photojournalist Jeannie Visconti’s compelling encounter with fascism during the Balkan conflicts. Propaganda techniques developed to demonise the Serbs and distort history became the template for future western interventions around the world. https://t.co/beSvyVJiCK
I believe that:
– Legacy media is the cancer of society.
– Israel killed Charlie for noticing.
– Real health comes from sun, meat, movement, and sleep.
– We are being ruled by a pedophile elite.
– Covid was a PsyOp to enslave humanity.
– Men cannot get pregnant; biological sex is binary and immutable.
– Big Pharma and Big Food see us as cash cows.
– Gender ideology is child abuse, pushing irreversible treatments on confused kids for profit.
– Geoengineering is an existential threat.
– Free speech is being dismantled in real time.
– Glyphosate and other pesticides in the food supply are silent killers.
– Most of what we’re told about history is a lie.
– More advanced civilizations existed in the past.
– Seed oils and processed carbs are the real drivers of the obesity and diabetes epidemics.
– Most “conservative” politicians in DC are controlled opposition bought by AIPAC money.
– Higher CO2 levels are a blessing for our planet.
– Living off-grid is the best means of resistance.
– Calling out evil and pedophilia isn’t anti-Semitic.
– Diversity is not a strength; it’s a weapon used to fracture cohesive societies.
– Fluoride in water is a neurotoxin added for control, and it’s linked to lower IQ in children.
– Fiat currency is slowly bleeding us dry through hidden inflation theft.
– Western politicians are routinely blackmailed by Israel via Mossad kompromat operations.
– Feminism has destroyed the family by turning women against men.
– Mass immigration is a deliberate program of white replacement.
That’s prob about why I had to flee my home country after being debanked several times. By the way, who’s owning the banks?
🏝️💀 Island boys has made it onto the idiot box 📺 @Channel9#epstein
⭐️ If your in Sydney & get the opportunity, visit the Botany Ciew Hotel in Newtown, grab a feed, a beer and see this mural in the flesh. Its some my best work and the digital images do not do it justice.
Its important to support the venues and wall owners who have the guts to give artists like me space to create our work🙏
Without them we dont have a canvas!
Recently I attended Putin's press conference in Moscow. He started talking about how the West is run by a Satanic Paedophile cult. Honestly, I thought, "ok, steady on. I know you're at war. But that's a bit too much." Turns out he was right. I mean, I'm sure the Russians have an excellent intel network around the world. And he knew.
But its not just the Epstein thing. I mean, that's sick. Its as bad as it gets. But its not just that. The degeneracy runs right through British and European policy making. Both domestic and foreign. They are just not acting in our peoples interests.
Honestly I realised some time ago. That I've been an idiot these last few years. Trying to argue that the war in Ukraine is not in British and European interests. But then I finally realised that I'm arguing with degenerates. That's what the British and European policy makers are. Degenerates. They simply don't care about the future of British and European peoples. And what do you do about that?