FKR Cult Exposer from the McAlbert lineage

[Nerd of Math Extraordinaire @NerdyandFlirty8]

I always love her breakdowns:

The Karen Read defense team’s transition from legal powerhouse to full-time social media influencers is officially complete. Here is my take from NMO's great, as always, analysis:

The Strategy: Why bother winning on actual legal merits—like missed deadlines or skipped conferences—when you can just submit a brief that acts as a giant written middle finger to the judge instead?

The Execution: Attorney Charles Waters managed to write a brief so needlessly snarky that it accused Judge Gilday of favoritism. Pro-tip: If the judge is already annoyed with the circus, maybe don't call him the ringmaster in writing.

The Backfire: They played to the Twitter crowd so hard that the judge flipped the script, demanding they actually prove their baseless claims by noon.

The Grand Finale: After some mysteriously leaked text messages hit the internet, the defense team won themselves a mandatory court date. Now every lawyer on the team gets to spend their week signing affidavits under penalty of perjury declaring they aren't the leak.

They've bought into their own online hype so deeply they forgot that real courtrooms don't have a "delete tweet" button and that 'reply all' doesn't usually work. Absolute masterclass in clown shoe litigation.

[Michelle @MBeachlover]

https://t.co/gmZ4wvQrXw

[Mama Llama @MamaLama43]

Karen Read, Aidan Kearney, or both are in big trouble. My guess is it’s the crazy chick—but hey, maybe it’s both.

Serious question for both of you: Why do you keep f**king with these judges? They’re not Judge Cannone, and you’re not in Norfolk County anymore, losers.

[Mama Llama @MamaLama43]

I’m sure the judge will get to the bottom of who leaked these. The judges in the Read/Kearney orbit don’t seem to be playing around anymore.

🚨🚨More importantly, It’s amazing when you think someone sending your own abuse and harassment of their family to law enforcement is a win.

💥Aidan Kearney is criminally charged with witness intimidation and harassment of Elizabeth Proctor.
The allegations involving Elizabeth Proctor from conduct that included:

-Publishing information about her and her workplace.

-Encouraging followers to contact her employer.

-Publicly sharing her cellphone number and calling her during a livestream.

-Allegedly intending to intimidate or harass her in connection with the criminal investigation

All this looks like is someone sending documented intimidation and harassment to a police officer for their criminal investigation.

💥💥We can still hate Michael Proctor for his vile, racist, and misogynistic texts. We can all agree that no one like that should be a police officer while also recognizing that this isn’t a win for Turtleboy. We should also all agree that Elizabeth has done nothing to deserve the abhorrent abuse she has received.

Ps: Call me crazy, but I actually think that in another life, Proctor and TB would have been best friends. 💯

[Masshole Mafia @MafiaMasshole]

Uh oh, someone is in trouble - I bet it's Karen Read or Aidan Kearney lol

[The Comm Center @commcenterpod]

AAAnd right on cue... Not an honest one in the bunch. I wonder what ruling is going to come out Monday that they want to distract from the truth by rubbing each other with "Brian Albert was a bully cop" lotion.

[mabbe8 @mabbe_8]

The Commonwealth Witnesses' latest federal court filing is worth reading because it does something that's been largely absent from the public conversation: it forces the allegations to match the evidence.

In their supplemental reply, Brian Albert, Nicole Albert, Jen McCabe, Matt McCabe, and Brian Higgins argue that Karen Read's amended opposition still fails to produce evidence supporting her central claims.

The filing points out that Read originally claimed to have grand jury testimony showing Brian and Nicole Albert contradicted each other. But the grand jury transcript was never filed with the court, never provided to opposing counsel, and was ultimately replaced with trial testimony that doesn't support the allegation.

The filing also accuses Read of repeatedly mischaracterizing testimony. It notes that Dr. Scordi-Bello never testified that John O'Keefe suffered dog bite wounds, despite Read's filing claiming she did. It also states that Ian Whiffin never testified John's cellphone was inside 34 Fairview, contrary to another allegation.

Perhaps most importantly, the defendants argue that Karen Read still has not produced evidence showing they lacked a factual basis when they told police and later testified that John O'Keefe never entered the house. They remind the court that no witness including Karen Read herself has ever testified under oath that John entered 34 Fairview.

After four years of accusations, conspiracy theories, and relentless attacks on these five people, this filing is a reminder that allegations are not evidence. If you're going to accuse people of murder and a coordinated cover-up, the evidence should support those claims.

According to this filing, it doesn't.
That's ultimately for the court to decide. But the house guests have now squarely challenged the factual basis of Karen Read's allegations, and they deserve credit for responding through the legal process rather than through social media.

[The Forensic Room @forensicroom]

No more kid gloves. Wednesday at 8PM ET, we're diving headfirst into Rachael Rollins and her recent comments, the actual meaning of intent versus the internet mythology Aidan Kearney is trying to sell, Karen Read's ever-expanding collection of fairy-tale filings, and everything else recently making headlines surrounding this case. Nothing is off limits.

Join us and please take note of the temporary schedule change! See you then!

https://t.co/QCdyWJnJBu

[Julie Carpenter @JulieCar94]

@MamaLama43 @NoodleMom1983 @DARollins @DARollins Thank you for clearing that up.

It's not every day a former DA goes on to a YouTube show and admits she is corrupt.

I sincerely hope you and the people you conspired with spend many, many years in prison. You deserve it.

[Zona Eagle @zonaeagle]

Oh Rachael, you can attempt to reduce your misdeeds to a “non-public e-mail”, but the 161-page scathing DOJ report (found in the comments) clearly highlights your corruption. Now, you’re publicly endorsing the nonsensical “witnesses covered up a murder” cOnspIrAcY despite being part of the investigation that determined there was no corruption in how local and state law enforcement managed this case. Given that, please clarify how all those taillight pieces ended up at 34 FV that night, Rachael! Is it any surprise that you now claim the blogger will be found not guilty in his WI case, especially when you admit to knowing little about it beyond the lacrosse game incident? Perhaps you should revisit some of his vile threats toward witnesses that undoubtedly violate that statute. It’s understandable, though, Rachael. We know you wouldn’t have prosecuted him; you don’t take “threats” seriously. You’ve made that clear in your bizarre memo listing 15 crimes that should be automatically dismissed before arraignment. At least the blogger was correct last night when he stated that you are merely a politician willing to lie to gain office. We agree!

https://t.co/rYXqeyK2nB

[Mama Llama @MamaLama43]

@DARollins @zonaeagle That you support THIS and want to be the district attorney in charge of protecting witnesses is absolutely terrifying. Legit terrifying.

[Nerd of Math Extraordinaire @NerdyandFlirty8]

Oh, look—the "smoke and mirrors" defense is hitting a slight snag called *reality*.

The Commonwealth Witnesses just dropped their supplemental reply in court, and it is a masterclass in calling out sheer embarrassment. Let’s break down the absolute comedy of errors that Karen Read’s team tried to pass off as a legal strategy:

* **The Imaginary Tape:** They confidently alleged that Brian Albert testified to a federal grand jury about having "intimate relations at 2:22 AM." The problem? They cited "Attachment 4," which they *forgot to actually file or show anyone*.

* **The Bait-and-Switch:** When called out, they panic-swapped it for "Attachment 9"—which turned out to be regular trial testimony that doesn't mention a single word about 2:22 AM or anyone's bedtime activities. Oops.

* **Creative Fan Fiction:** The motion also claimed Dr. Scordi-Bello testified that Officer O'Keefe had "dog bite wounds" and that Ian Whiffin testified O'Keefe's phone was inside the house. Guess what the actual transcripts show? *Neither of them ever said that.*

Turns out, when you base your entire anti-SLAPP defense on fan fiction and transcripts you hoped the judge wouldn't actually read, the whole thing falls apart. You can't scream "conspiracy" and then cite attachments that literally do not exist.

Receipts check: Decidedly invalid. The adults in the room have entered the chat, and they’re asking for attorneys' fees.

[Mama Llama @MamaLama43]

🚨NEW: THE COMMONWEALTH WITNESSES' SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF MOTIONS TO DISMISS.

Today, Brian Albert, Nicole Albert, Jennifer McCabe, Matthew McCabe, and Brian Higgins (the “Commonwealth Witnesses”) submitted this supplemental reply in further support of their motions to dismiss Karen Read’s preposterous lawsuit, in which she is literally suing them for testifying against her in her murder trial after they were subpoenaed by the Commonwealth to do so.

In reality, she is simply trying to align them with the police—a narrative she has been pushing since 2022.

Prediction: Reads lawsuit will be Dismissed.

Defend the truth: https://t.co/BoI2o9XWbm

[Julie Carpenter @JulieCar94]

She's telling us everything.

@DARollins admits she opened an investigation into John O'Keefe's death at Karen Read's request, likely through David Yannetti using his connections.

This prosecutor denied justice to a man who had spent his entire life serving others for a privileged and wealthy white woman.

There is no greater corruption.

And for those of you wondering why a guilty person would go to the AUSA, two things:

1. Karen Read read the book American Injustice by David Rudolf like it was her Bible as she awaited indictment. The book examines our justice system and strongly suggests the Federal government may be used to right wrongs at that state level. Read, being as crafty and clever as she is, saw an opportunity.

2. Listen to Rachel Rollins. She's insane. She was the perfect mark for Read. Read knew the political climate could be used to her advantage.

[Julie Carpenter @JulieCar94]

What you've done is unforgivable and unconscionable.

To so glibly speak out what Kearney and Read did to innocent people so a wealthy person could evade responsibility is despicable.

We are Americans, Rachel.

We don't do vigilante mob justice.

We have due process within a courthouse.

The justice system is the corner stone of all of our freedoms. When its sanctity is attacked as Kearney and Read did, it should be met with grave consequences. You allowed your office to be used for a witch hunt. You allowed innocent people to be hunted down by an insane mob.

You are a dangerous person and you don't belong in office anywhere in this country.

[Masshole Mafia @MafiaMasshole]

I was today years old when I learned that if elected as Suffolk County DA @DARollins would happily allow victims and witnesses to be harassed and pressured because that type of conduct doesn't phase her.
So if you live in Suffolk County, pray she doesn't get elected, or if she does, think twice before cooperating with her office as a witness because she does not think you deserve to be protected.

[Masshole Mafia @MafiaMasshole]

Why do you want to be District Attorney again when you hold such contempt for victims and witnesses?
If i believed Turtleboy I'd believe you just want the unmarked car again for holiday shopping mall traffic. Or that you want to keep the "Rollins Crime Family" (isn't that what he called your family?) out of trouble.
I bet you didn't like when he did all that to you and your family, as a public figure, did you? Sucks, even when you step into the spotlight voluntarily.
Yet you think it's fine to do to victims and witnesses and their families.
You couldn't be less qualified for the job or worthy of public trust if you put in a concerted effort at this point.

[Jamz @theginnyjamz]

Ah yes, the timeless Aidan Kearney argument: "A woman disagrees with me, therefore she must not be having sex." 😂

It's always fascinating when grown adults dust off the same middle-school insult every single time a woman says something they don't like. Meanwhile, if being perpetually angry were caused by a lack of sex, I'd say this comment and so many of his tweets and YT Lives are a pretty compelling case study. 🤣😂

Coming from a man with a résumé full of failed relationships, this is giving major "every accusation is a confession" energy. I'd ask if anyone's rushing to take him up on his own offer, but I think it's fairly obvious the waiting list is nonexistent - unless, of course, we're counting Sparkly Rabbit and the like. 🤣

[Julie Carpenter @JulieCar94]

Say one thing @Bederowlaw @BostonDefender about Michael Proctor being misogynistic.

One.

Fucking.

Thing.

You both support him. You both promote him.

And he's a pig.

And both of you try to insult me by calling me a "housewife" and talk about the cut of my "blouses". Pigs.

We see you. We see you.

[Eric M @EricMulhollan12]

@DropMicrodots Not nice to talk about Aidan like that