He's wrong. When BIP-110 nodes begin enforcing the new rules, if the 1st block is BIP-110 compliant, both BIP-110 nodes and legacy nodes will accept it.
The 2nd block could still be a legacy block.
Legacy nodes would accept it & BIP-110 nodes would reject. The chains diverge.
He's wrong. When BIP-110 nodes begin enforcing the new rules, if the 1st block is BIP-110 compliant, both BIP-110 nodes and legacy nodes will accept it.
The 2nd block could still be a legacy block.
Legacy nodes would accept it & BIP-110 nodes would reject. The chains diverge.
@DiveBTC@LibertyBTC The problem is BIP-110 doesn't do anything besides virtue signal. If it actually stopped the spammers I'd get behind it, but it doesn't. If you want to virtue signal that's fine though but BIP-110 doesn't solve anything.
BIP-110 seems to be a longshot at this point. The worst part about it is all the gaslighting and riling up the plebs when it doesn't even reduce arbitrary data. A total waste of time.
@DrJackKruse It's BIP-148 and I doubt it. You know the big pools all had meetings by now and have a meeting set up for when this goes live to make sure it goes smoothly and BIP-110 forks off.
@IfindCoretards The only way to stop this type of spam is probably rolling back taproot. Doing that would a ton of problems so you are stuck with NFTs and other "spam". Get used to it.