🚨🎙️Thierry Henry on Arsenal becoming Champions of England:
Arsenal didn’t ‘get lucky’, they took the crown from Manchester City. There’s a difference. For four years everyone in England acted like the Premier League belonged to City permanently, like the rest of the league were just guests waiting for permission to compete. Arsenal changed that.”
“After that defeat at the Etihad, the media buried Arsenal. Pundits folded instantly. Fans were laughing, rivals were posting memes, and suddenly the title race was ‘over’. But champions don’t panic after one defeat. Weak teams do. This Arsenal side responded like real winners.”
“And let me say something that will upset people, this Manchester City side is not the City machine people pretend it is anymore. The fear factor is gone. Teams go to the Etihad now believing they can survive. A few years ago opponents were beaten in the tunnel before kickoff. Arsenal smelled that weakness before anyone else.”
“What impresses me most is the mentality. Arsenal have been mocked for YEARS. Banter club. Soft. Bottle jobs. ‘Trust the process’ jokes every single season. Yet now look at everybody. Silent. Because the same club people laughed at just dethroned the most dominant English side of the modern era.”
“And for the rival fans crying already, no, this is not a ‘one-off’. That’s the scary part. Arsenal are young, hungry, aggressive, and they play without fear. Liverpool fans won one league and called it a dynasty. Chelsea fans spent billions and still can’t build an identity. United fans live in nostalgia. Tottenham fans celebrate finishing above Arsenal like it’s a trophy parade. Meanwhile Arsenal are champions of England again.”
“People wanted Arsenal to fail so badly because they know what this club looks like when it rises. The atmosphere changes in football. The arrogance returns. The belief returns. And the rest of the league starts getting nervous.”
“So congratulations to Arsenal. They didn’t back into the title. They earned it. And the funniest thing? The tears from rival fans have only just started.”
@Support
Hi, I've now received two separate automated confirmations that my Premium alt account @the_F_investor has been restored to full functionality. The account remains suspended, a technical error on X's side? Please can you manually verify & apply the restoration? Thanks!
@CernBasher Few questions Cern:
1. This analysis assumes the investor holds for 100 years? You could have made money over shorter periods.
2. Is inflation factored in? Obviously more recent gains will have more weight.
3. Are 100-year avg returns inclusive of pre-founding years? (e.g. NVDA)
@Franz_Ferdinand I’ve been a fan since the beginning. Tonight I’m bringing my daughter to her first gig in Leeds. She’s called Eleanor. So maybe you could play the song…? 😊
We’re being told hospitals are “flooded” with GLP-1 complications and that we’re at the “tip of the iceberg.” I’ve been a bariatric surgeon long enough to remember these drugs when they were still in trials. I’ve prescribed them. I’ve monitored patients on them. And when the ER had a question about one of my patients on a GLP-1, they called me. I am not seeing a flood. What I see — every single shift — are the consequences of untreated obesity: heart failure, uncontrolled diabetes, infections, sleep apnea crises, fatty liver disease progressing quietly toward cirrhosis. That is the deluge.
Yes, GLP-1 medications have side effects. We know what they are. We counsel patients about them. We stop the drug if needed. That’s called medicine. But the claim that a hidden catastrophe is overwhelming hospitals is not something you prove with adjectives. You prove it with data. And if such a signal were real, it would not remain invisible for long in a healthcare system that tracks admissions, billing codes, adverse events, and outcomes with relentless precision.
Obesity is a chronic, relapsing disease with serious downstream consequences. Treating it is not cosmetic vanity, and it is not “forcibly stopping people from eating.” It is modifying disordered physiology — something we do every day with insulin, thyroid hormone, antihypertensives, and chemotherapy. The relevant comparison is not drug risk versus zero. It is drug risk versus the very real morbidity of leaving obesity untreated.
If someone believes there is an iceberg, show the sonar. Until then, what I see in the emergency room is not a wave of GLP-1 disasters. I see the far more predictable damage of a disease we’ve under-treated for decades.
This is an incredible announcement. I believe the biggest cultural driver to adopt autonomous vehicles will be insurers and lower prices for consumers, not the excitement of the tech.
NEWS: U.S. insurer Lemonade has announced that it will offer a 50% rate cut for drivers of @Tesla vehicles when FSD is steering because it had data showing it reduced accidents.
“A car that sees 360 degrees, never gets drowsy, and reacts in milliseconds can’t be compared to a human. Beyond the product announcement today, we’re also announcing our commitment to the Tesla community – the safer FSD software becomes, the more our prices will drop,” said Shai Wininger, co-founder and president at Lemonade.
I'm in the Nvidia Q&A with Jensen and someone just asked the difference between Alpamayo and Tesla FSD
Jensen said:
“As to your second question: Tesla’s FSD stack is completely world-class. They’ve been working on it for quite some time. It’s world-class not only in the number of miles it’s accumulated, but in the way it’s designed—the way they do training, data collection, curation, synthetic data generation, and all of their simulation technologies.
Of course, the latest generation is end-to-end Full Self-Driving—meaning it’s one large model trained end to end. And so… Elon’s AD system is, in every way, 100% state-of-the-art. I’m really quite impressed by the technology. I have it, and I drive it in our house, and it works incredibly well.
Alpamayo was designed around a different idea. The first difference is that NVIDIA doesn’t build self-driving cars—we build the full stack and the technology for everybody else to build self-driving cars. And we build—like we do for humanoid robotics—three computers: the training computer, the simulation computer, and the robotics computer, which is the self-driving car computer. We have software stacks across all of that.
Our customers can use all of it, some of it, or parts of it—whatever makes sense for them. And so we’re working with the entire industry—Tesla for their training system, Waymo for the car computer, and XPeng. Nuro—who I think just announced they’re going into the robotaxi business—with Lucid and Uber; and NVIDIA is part of that.
So our system is really quite pervasive because we’re a technology platform provider—that’s the primary difference. There’s no question in our mind that, of the billion cars on the road today, in another 10 years’ time, hundreds of millions of them will have great autonomous capability. This is likely one of the largest, fastest-growing technology industries over the next decade.
And the last thing we do is: we open-source everything. If a customer would like to use the model that we train, they’re welcome to do that. If they would like to use our model technology but train it themselves, we even help them do that. We’re not a self-driving car company—we just want to enable the world’s autonomous industry. Everything that moves should be autonomous.”
In the United States, there is a traffic fatality roughly every 79 million miles.
Tesla FSD has now traveled 6.4 billion miles. Assuming it was no more or less safe than driving manually, you would expect there to be 81 fatalities with FSD on.
As a matter of fact, with 14 million miles traveled every day you would expect to see a fatality with FSD on every 5 days.
But that's not happening. As far as I can tell there are only ~2 reported fatalities with FSD active — both on much older versions.
I'm forced to conclude that there are at least ~75 people who are alive today because of the work of the @Tesla_AI team. And we're just getting started.
To give you a visual on that, if you put everyone in North America who is alive today because of FSD in a room together it would look like this:
Inside look into our photons in–actions out AI system
Our fleet learns 500 years of real-world driving every day, allowing FSD to generalize to rare, complex edge cases
The AI & training systems that drive @Robotaxi also teach @Tesla_Optimus how to move
@iamtomnash This was way more interesting and useful than I expected it would be. Every investor should watch this, Very methodical and logical, thanks!
Someone I know is rowing solo across the Atlantic!
An incredible challenge is ahead! Rowing the Atlantic isn’t just about strength; it’s about determination and resilience.
Every bit of support counts—please consider donating or sharing! https://t.co/Z4IVrKfh4F
Here's how to vote in @Tesla's shareholder meeting:
For $TSLA shareholders who use Fidelity:
• To cast your vote online, you’ll need to search for a specific email in your inbox, which may be in your spam folder (same email address that is associated with your broker account). The email may come from one of several different addresses. Search for an email received in 2025 using the following keywords: “Tesla”, “https://t.co/[email protected]”, “[email protected]”, or “[email protected]”. Open the email and follow described instructions to vote.
Robinhood:
• To cast your vote online, you’ll need to search for a specific email in your inbox, which may be in your spam folder (same email address that is associated with your broker account). Search for an email received in 2025 using the following keywords: “[email protected] Tesla”. Open the email and click VOTE.
Interactive Brokers:
• To cast your vote online, you’ll need to search for a specific email in your inbox, which may be in your spam folder (same email address that is associated with your broker account). Search for an email received in 2025 using the following keywords: “[email protected] Tesla”. Open the email and follow described instructions.
Charles Schwab:
• To cast your vote online, you’ll need to search for a specific email in your inbox, which may be in your spam folder (same email address that is associated with your broker account). Search for an email received in 2025 using the following keywords: “[email protected] Tesla”. Additionally, you can log into your brokerage account, use the keywords ‘proxy events’ in the search bar and navigate to proxy events. Alternatively, search for a 16-digit control number in your postal mail. Visit https://t.co/nc7qLyN6sB and submit your 16-digit control number to vote.
Morgan Stanley/E*Trade:
• To cast your vote online, you’ll need to search for a specific email in your inbox, which may be in your spam folder (same email address that is associated with your broker account). Search for an email received in 2025 using the following keywords: “[email protected] Tesla”. Open the email and follow described instructions.
Merrill Lynch:
• To cast your vote online, you’ll need to search for a specific email in your inbox, which may be in your spam folder (same email address that is associated with your broker account). Search for an email received in 2025 using the following keywords: “[email protected] Tesla”. The email may come from one of several different addresses so please search your inbox for “Tesla” as well. Open the email and follow described instructions.
Vanguard Brokerage:
• To cast your vote online, you’ll need to search for a specific email in your inbox, which may be in your spam folder (same email address that is associated with your broker account). Search for an email received in 2025 using the following keywords: “[email protected] Tesla”. Open the email and follow described instructions.
J.P. Morgan:
• To cast your vote online, you’ll need to search for a specific email in your inbox, which may be in your spam folder (same email address that is associated with your broker account). Search for an email received in 2025 using the following keywords: "[email protected] Tesla" Open the email and follow described instructions. If you cannot locate this email, contact JPM support at 888-938-4409 to learn how to vote.
All Other Brokerages:
• To cast your vote online, you’ll need to search for a specific email in your inbox, which may be in your spam folder (same email address that is associated with your broker account). Try searching for each of these three terms to see if you can locate an email from your broker sent in 2025:
“[email protected] Tesla”
“@proxydocs.com Tesla”
“@saytechnologies.com Tesla”
If you find an email, open it and follow described instructions.
International $TSLA holders:
Some brokers outside of the U.S. don’t allow retail shareholders to vote. If you have not received any voting instructions, please contact your broker to confirm if they provide for proxy voting and, if so, to request such instructions. If you have any additional questions regarding how to vote, please contact Tesla's proxy solicitor, Innisfree M&A Incorporated, at (877) 717-3936 (from the United States or Canada) or +1 (412) 232-3651 (from other locations). Sometimes, when you don't participate in proxy voting, brokers may exercise their discretion to cast votes on your behalf, so be proactive!
General info:
If you cannot locate any emails, try voting by mail, phone or QR code. If you have not received any instructions whether via email or by mail, contact your broker as soon as possible to request such instructions. More info here:
• Vote by phone: https://t.co/rvM5TD4hPX
• Vote by QR code: https://t.co/pDlyEiInUS
• Vote by mail: https://t.co/XPsgoMZslH
Every vote counts, whether you own one share or many. Make your voices heard. It only takes a few minutes.
Reminder: You must have been a Tesla shareholder as of the September 15th record date to be able to vote.
Tesla's shareholder meeting will take place on November 6, 2025 in Austin, Texas. Voting is now open, so go vote!