.7e

[.7e @Under91e]

@lifejsaquiz Are you mqsked.pirate?

[.7e @Under91e]

@atharibrotherr You’re one of the the only brother I look forward to posting. May Allah keep you steadfast and protected.

[👾 @atharibrotherr]

The 4th century Mālikī scholars gathered and issued a fatwa on the obligation of,

Joining the leader of the Khawārij Abū Yazīd (d. 336 H) in his revolt against the apostate Fatimids (Banū ʿUbayd).

[.7e @Under91e]

@ABH159 @akhintahurr @MuratAr39485885 The akh didnt say that

[al-Darawardi @SchizoPashtun]

A nightmare report for the camp of the Tawaghit

’Ali bin Abi Talib said:

“It is obligatory for the Caliph to judge by what Allah has revealed and to fulfill the trust. If he does that, it becomes obligatory for the Muslims to listen, obey and respond when they are called upon.”

[.7e @Under91e]

@muwahid_writes1 @AlDonFodio @sh_Ahmad_Jibril How do you contact shaykh Haytham?

[.7e @Under91e]

May Allah deprive you of marriage. Allah protected a sincere muwahhidah from this clown.

[Project Guiding Light @ProjectGuiding]

As Shaykh Nasir Al-Fahd فك الله بالعز اسره states in Mūjibāt Al-Istighfār, and likewise in its Sharh by Shaykh Ahmad حفظه الله — defending your brother from slander is something many people overlook, and as a result, need toً perform Istighfār. How many slanders do we see of Mujāhideen, of the Scholars, of our laymen brothers? Nobody is “not big enough” to defend from slander, and your defense must be based solely on your desire to defend a Muslims honor, and nothing else. That being said, we must recognize when slanderers are simply bums trying to generate traffic to their page, or perhaps are just so insecure and jealous, that they want to “punch up,” even though they’re about as insignificant as a cockroach. Someone who can’t recite Al-Fātihah, who is a pathological liar, is pushing 50+ years of age but you can’t differentiate between his attitude and the attitude of high school girl on her menstrual cycle, who throws a hissy fit when someone doesn’t refer to him by his pronoun of choice — there comes a time where it’s best to just ignore such a character, and leave them to live their “fulfilling” life on the internet.

[.7e @Under91e]

@Igloo567167509 @Alien_Zaki you do not share the video or document or whatever. Nonetheless it’s not smart to do either.

[.7e @Under91e]

@Igloo567167509 @Alien_Zaki If the video or document you had gave you instructions on how to do a particular thing then that would be an offence and you’d fall under section 58 however if not then its not an offence so long as -

[.7e @Under91e]

@Athari_Yahya Can you point out those kufriyyat akhi

[.7e @Under91e]

@hiwabusally Literally the attribute of you guys, selective outrage/nifaq at its finest.

[Project Guiding Light @ProjectGuiding]

Repost with added context, and blurred Awrah:

The Madkhali onramp to “da’wah” is very interesting.

Either be mentally ill, insecure, and/or lonely > start your “da’wah” by bootlicking Tawagheet and calling others Khawarij. Or;

Be mentally ill, insecure, and/or lonely + Fasiq who openly engages in Fahisha > part time involvement in “da’wah” by bootlicking Tawagheet and calling others Khawarij.

Be a miniature snorlax with an Oompa Loompa bodytype, slander imprisoned sisters in the camps (may Allah disfigure his tongue), have a relationship outside of marriage whilst giving “da’wah” > get exposed by the same woman you had a relationship with as being physically abusive and pathetic > she leaks a picture of you buck naked in her bed, infer what you may of that > launch your “shaykh” career. Keep in mind this guy can’t even speak Arabic properly.

Madkhali future is in good hands?

No wonder these guys avoid Mubahalah like the plague. What’s left to be cursed? Cursed ideology, bums who are unemployed, no share of this Dunya, nothing — these guys got nothing going for them. May Allah increase His torment and on these Zanadiqa.

[.7e @Under91e]

@SherxaniBaban @FirmUponTruth Conveniently left out “and the books of aqa’id weren’t written yet” hhh

[.7e @Under91e]

@SherxaniBaban Likewise Ibn Jibrin mentioned in his sharh of Aqidah at-Tahawiyyah the kufr of the one that backs the kuffar against the muslimin and says that indicates love for the kuffar again proving kufr whilst also dismantling ahl al-Irja’.

[.7e @Under91e]

@SherxaniBaban Ibn Uthaymin in his Tasfir of al ‘Imran mentions the permissibility of supporting a kafir against another common enemy kafir for the benefit of the muslimin then goes onto mention supporting a kafir against a muslim is not permissible in any situation بأي حال —