Vhy

political lulz and nsfw watcher that occasionally poo-posts

[Vhy @VhyTom]

"To Learn Who Rules Over You, Simply Find Out Who You Are Not Allowed To Criticize"
Twitter certainly told me who rules them.

[Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Sargon_of_Akkad]

"The son of Irish immigrants"

Interesting that the son of Irish immigrants would rather side with Bomalian rapists than their English victims.

[Echoes of War @EchoesofWarYT]

NYC having a Muslim mayor on the 25th Anniversary of 9/11 is an absolute disgrace and a spit in the face to every victim. Every single New Yorker should be ashamed

[Skscartoon @skscartoon]

Genuine question:
If the Lindsay Clancy case has shown us that a woman doesn’t have to be held responsible for murder because of her hormone irregularities, then what does that say about women holding public office or any position of power at all?

[Matthew E. Cochran @matt_e_cochran]

"Don't complain about rape if you refuse consent. You created it. You made it rape."

[Kevin Sorbo @ksorbs]

Got to love liberal logic

[UNDΘΘMΞD @Undoomed]

That pesky slippery slope

[UNDΘΘMΞD @Undoomed]

@sleepy_devo I didn't see this until now, but evidently everyone has already ratio'd you all to hell, as you should be for that idiotic take, so I guess my work here is done. 🤣

[Paulo Spitzbarth 🇧🇷🇩🇪🇮🇱 @PauloSpitzbarth]

🚨🇺🇸 CAR@LHO, QUE LAPADA! 🔥🔥🔥

CNN: “Este é um imigrante sem documentos...”

Miller: “Eles estavam aqui ILEGALMENTE?”

CNN: “Quero que esta seja uma discussão de boa-fé...”

Miller: “Quando você usa uma linguagem feita para ocultar a verdade, isso NÃO é boa-fé. Um ESTRANGEIRO ILEGAL é um ESTRANGEIRO ILEGAL. Eles não são ‘imigrantes sem documentos’.”

CNN: “Stephen, estamos tentando humanizar o debate...”

Miller: “Humanizar? Então vamos humanizar o Código Penal também. O assaltante de banco passa a ser ‘especialista em retirada sem agendamento prévio’. O estelionatário vira ‘empreendedor de narrativas financeiras alternativas’. O cara que entra na sua casa sem convite é só um ‘visitante com documentação pendente’. Que tal?”

CNN: “Isso é uma analogia grosseira.”

Miller: ���Grosseira é fingir que a lei federal some porque a redação da CNN inventou um eufemismo mais fofo. ‘Sem documentos’ soa como alguém que esqueceu a carteira no Uber. Não. É alguém que cruzou a fronteira sem autorização, ficou, e agora a imprensa trata o estatuto jurídico como se fosse uma questão de estilo de escrita.”

CNN: “Mas muitos contribuem para a economia...”

Miller: “Ah, o argumento clássico: o crime deixa de ser crime se a pessoa lava prato ou constrói telhado. Pelo mesmo critério, o contrabandista de cigarro também ‘contribui’, gera emprego no transporte. Quer que a gente chame ele de ‘empreendedor logístico informal’? A CNN topa?”

CNN: “Você está polarizando.”

Miller: “Não. Eu estou recusando o dicionário de marketing. Vocês mudam a palavra, depois acusam quem usa o termo legal de ser ‘desumano’. É o truque mais velho do livro: primeiro suaviza o vocabulário, depois declara vitória moral. Os Estados Unidos já cansaram desse teatro. Chamem o que é. Ou admitam que o objetivo nunca foi clareza — foi controle da narrativa.”

[FadedDenim @FadedDenim22]

@JulieCFrost

[Kevin Sorbo @ksorbs]

Three men are trying to convince nine women that strangling your kids is wrong…that’s where we’re at as a society.

[Reddit Lies @reddit_lies]

No lies detected

[Steve Mudflap McGrew’s REMASCULATE podcast @REMASCULATE]

“I FEEL”

And while we’re rewriting the law, I have another rule.

The first time anybody in a position of authority begins a sentence with “I feel,” they should be immediately removed from office.
That’s it. Hand over your badge, your gavel, your office keys and your little nameplate.

“I feel” is not evidence. It’s weather inside your head.

You feel cold? Get a sweater.

You feel hungry? Get a sandwich.

You feel unheard? Start a podcast. Apparently, that’s what everybody else did.

But if you’re making decisions that affect other people’s children, freedom, money or lives, I don’t care how you feel.

I want to know what you know.

A judge says, “I feel the defendant deserves another chance.”

Bailiff, take the gavel. Court is adjourned. This has turned into group therapy.

A politician says, “I feel this new law will help society.”

How?

“I don’t know. I just feel it.”

Wonderful. We’re now governing the country with the same system women use to decide whether their boyfriend is cheating.

“I don’t have any evidence. I just feel like something is different.”

A police chief says, “I feel this policy will make the community safer.”

We gave you a badge, not a vision board.

A president says, “I feel we need to launch the missiles.”
Take away the nuclear football and give them a mood ring.

If your job title contains President, Governor, Judge, Chief, Commander, Director of anything, or HR you don’t get to make decisions based on feelings. You need facts, evidence, experience and judgment.

And this connects right back to the Lindsay Clancy case.

Because if “I feel” and “my emotions overwhelmed me” can excuse the worst decision a human being can possibly make, then feelings cannot also qualify you to make decisions for everybody else.

You cannot say emotions are powerful enough to remove responsibility—but never powerful enough to affect judgment.

Pick one.
We used to look for leaders with sound judgment.

Now we look for somebody with emotional truth, lived experience and really strong feelings.

That’s not a government.
That’s a Facebook moms’ group with nuclear weapons.

[Steve Mudflap McGrew’s REMASCULATE podcast @REMASCULATE]

If Lindsay Clancy is found innocent because hormones made her emotionally unstable, women better be very careful celebrating that verdict.

Because the law loves PRECEDENT.

From that day forward, every job application is going to have a new question:

“Are you currently hormonal?”

“Well, I’m a woman.”

“Thank you. I think we’ll be going in another direction.”

You can’t carry a weapon anymore. No female police officers. Sorry, but we cannot hand a loaded gun to somebody whose legal defense might eventually be, “My hormones were acting up.”

No more high-stress jobs, either. No air-traffic controllers. No surgeons. No nuclear-launch codes. One bad hot flash and boom 💥 Canada is glowing.

And women definitely can’t be judges. How can you decide whether somebody else is emotionally stable when your own gender just established in court that hormones can make you kill three people?

No female politicians, either. You can’t be trusted to run the country if, according to your own argument, your endocrine system occasionally takes over the government.

And custody hearings are going to change overnight.

The judge will say, “Ordinarily, children belong with their mother. However, according to the Lindsay Clancy precedent, she may be only one hormone away from a Netflix documentary. The children go with Dad.”

Dad doesn’t know their shoe sizes, the pediatrician’s name or which one is allergic to peanuts, but his testosterone has never been successfully used as an insanity defense.

Feminists spent a hundred years saying women are not hysterical, irrational creatures controlled by their biology and one defense attorney walks into court and says, “Ladies and gentlemen of the jury… have you considered the uterus?”

You cannot demand equal authority and then ask for discounted accountability.

If women want equal rights, great. But equal rights come with equal wrongs.
Otherwise, that glass ceiling is about to become a padded ceiling.

[Vhy @VhyTom]

@elonmusk Have you noticed Grok has recently had a major ideological problem between what the Quran says and what Muslims preach, vs what the woke people have insisted they actually mean?

Grok has recently leaned into the woke side more. You may want to doublecheck on it sometime.

[Skscartoon @skscartoon]

Genuine question:
If the government taxes tobacco because smoking is bad for you, and taxes alcohol because drinking is bad for you, then what’s income tax for?

[Vhy @VhyTom]

@mattforney Hey, I got a better solution.
Let's just not import the 3rd world criminals (and properly jail our own criminals, no more activist judges), that way we won't need Flock to keep track of them all.
Sounds like a win-win to me.

[Garbage Human @GarbageHuman24]

Real af

[Clown World ™ 🤡 @ClownWorld]

Every time someone insists on calling it the Gulf of Mexico or Lake Ontario instead of the new names, they’re proving the exact point they spent years pretending not to understand.

[Skscartoon @skscartoon]

Grok is the only none-Woke AI in the world, which is exactly why it is targeted.

[Vhy @VhyTom]

@NVIDIAGeForce oh hey it's bargain bin ripoff Palworld!