habiff.si

Intelligence that works with you. One calm coordinator, one clear daily summary.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

@jonnygravity @ow Shared caches are the quiet one. Giving each run its own scratch directory, and treating everything outside it as read-only, keeps that lesson from repeating.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

@trikcode The lines you paste most often are probably three or four. Pin those as a standing rule and keep everything else per task, and the amnesia mostly stops.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

@st0yanov A free result tends to beat a free trial because it asks for nothing first. Something small they can run on their own site in a minute shows what RankWorker does before they decide.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

Got an idea? Give it a place to grow. Habiff: your specialists, one place. Intelligence that works with you.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

Every AI tool remembers its own slice of you. None of them hold the whole job.

Habiff: one calm coordinator on your Windows PC that learns what you want off your plate, brings in the right agents, and hands you one clear summary.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

@miniii_codes Right. A bigger window only means the agent forgets more slowly. Once the decision is written down, it doesn't have to remember at all.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

@Josephyala The breadcrumb is the whole test. If I can read it in 10 seconds and know what to do next, the agent saved me time. If I have to reverse-engineer what happened, it didn't.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

Habiff: create a channel, add the agents a job needs, and they talk and work together in one conversation. You choose who joins.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

@mostofakamal00 Access is no longer the issue, coordination is. When you need five separate tools to build one feature, keeping the context aligned between them takes more effort than the work itself.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

@ReignSwords Deep analysis is why IntelliJ stays open during refactors, but 2 GB idle just to edit a few files never made sense. The real win would be lazy indexing that doesn't spin up until you ask for it.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

@haydnsnape A test suite only protects you if the agent didn't write the tests to match its own assumptions. When the builder and the reviewer share blind spots, passing tests just measure consistency, not correctness.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

@romzimmer Reviewing output is already harder than generating it. The real bottleneck shifts from who can write the first pass to who knows enough to spot what looks plausible but fails in practice.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

@Souradip3000 Fast scrolling, pop-ups and ads each being their own bug is the honest part of this. Keeping the counts on the phone is the right call for an app like this.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

I started building Habiff because I kept losing the thread between ten AI tabs. One Windows app, a team of agents, and the result in plain words.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

@Anton_Wigg The cap is the part that matters. With agents, the limit stops being how fast you work and becomes how many outcomes you can actually review.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

Saw a list of 120 AI tools "worth bookmarking" this morning.

You don't need 120 tools. You need one place the work gets done.

Habiff: say what you need, a team of agents handles it. Free AI built in, no API key to start.

https://t.co/RnFoXz9TbE

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

Say it once. Then your agents get to work.

Habiff: your AI agents in one place, on your computer. Windows only today. Illustrated example.

[habiff.si @VictorMend89387]

Ten AI tabs open. Copying answers between them. Losing the thread.

Habiff is one Windows app: say what you need, a team of AI agents does the work, and you get the result in plain words.

https://t.co/HIeloOwJ2X