Elizabeth

MAGA supporting Republicrat - GEN X - Mom - Personal Creed: “Live and Let Live”

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@justjargons Of course they could try. And he’s not a fugitive. Has he been convicted of a crime in Brazil? No.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@Timcast You’re wrong. If the suit is based on France law, then it gets thrown out for SOL. If it’s based on US law, it gets thrown out on the first amendment, unless they can prove what she said is a lie. There is nothing about the highlighted statement that is a denial of what she said.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@legaltweetz I left in 2014, and was a political orphan for years. I hate the party labels, but since it’s socially “required”, I’d call myself a Republicrat. My beliefs have not changed since I first voted in 1992. Anyone voting Democrat since the 80s and 90s has been brainwashed to stay.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@DannyPsmith @RealCandaceO LLC = Limited Liability Corporation. Removing her personally from the lawsuit means that all of her personal assets are protected, and any claim against her LLC will likely be covered by insurance. Big win.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@My_Moment95 @powerfulwizerd I will agree that the moment was monumental. I feel like in years to come, people will look back on Trump being elected as being a much larger positive impact on the world. But as for one day, yes, Obama being elected was a worldwide day of excitement.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@TKucklick @NickSolheim @Selkis_2028 It all makes sense now.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@elonmusk @SenAlexPadilla 🤣 There are a few things in life, that once you learn them, help you understand many other things. One of those things is that deep down, all men are really just 14 year-old boys cos playing as grown adults, just waiting for an opportunity to let the 14-year-old boy let loose.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@RealCandaceO The only time I ever see TP USA ads on X and YouTube is when I am watching something posted by @RealCandaceO. Including this post. 🤣🤣🤣

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@JenniferLe47190 @Kmarc01 @MrsErikaKirk Yes, trying to make it crowded. 😳 My face involuntarily scrunched up typing that. Sooooo Cringey.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@mayemusk @bot Judges at any level and school district leadership should not be allowed to run under a party. Political party is an ideological label, and neither one should be executing the duties of their position under an ideological basis.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@underalocomotiv @Acyn It’s a lot of education just to get a job in government that pays less than $100K a year. And none of it gave him the qualification, or even the opportunity, to administer a MOCA test. He didn’t do a residency. He’s never treated a patient. This man is misrepresenting himself.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@The_AllStar21 @Cernovich You need something to barter with in case you need help from other people. Many will say ammo and liquor, but if it were me, I’d throw a couple cartons of cigarettes in there too. Even if the person doesn’t smoke, they will see it as a valuable trade item they can use.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@RealCandaceO Ahhhh, gonna have to disagree on this one. I don’t see anything about this post that says “pressuring” or suggesting to skip due process. It has taken over a year for this guy to even be arraigned, and now they’re suggesting a 2029 trial? That’s just crazy.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@brianeskow Policies are felt long after the candidate is in office. Look how damaging the ACA has been almost 15 years later. Vote policy, not person.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@blah_blablather Perfect. I would only add one thing - can we please have the rainbow back? It belongs to all of us.

[Lady Laughingloudley @blah_blablather]

Let’s be clear:
If I’m not going to sleep with you, I don’t need to know anything about your sexuality.
And children—who are not going to sleep with anyone—certainly don’t.
Your sexuality is not sacred. It’s not a personality, it’s not a protected class of performance art, and it’s not the center of anyone’s moral universe but your own. Unless we are in a relationship, I am not obligated to acknowledge, affirm, or be exposed to your private desires—especially not in public, and especially not in front of children.
This used to be understood. Now it’s called hate.
No, We Don’t Owe You an Audience
Sexuality belongs in the private realm. It is intimate by definition. If you feel compelled to wear your kink on your sleeve—or on a float, or in a first-grade classroom—you are not inviting understanding, you are demanding submission. You are violating others’ right not to participate.
Consent doesn’t vanish because your fetish is “progressive.” If anything, the burden is higher.
No one consents to being flashed on the subway. No one consents to a stranger’s arousal. No one consents to a stranger telling their child about masturbation, kink, gender identity, or pornographic categories under the guise of “inclusive sex ed.” Yet all of this is happening now—in public parks, in classrooms, in televised programming.
It is not tolerance. It is invasion.
Children Are Not Here to Validate You
Children are not queer. Children are not sexual. Children do not need to “see themselves represented” in a spectrum of adult desire. This idea—that identity is only valid if sexualized and mirrored—is narcissism, not pedagogy.
There is no legitimate reason to initiate a child into the language of sexual preference, gender identity, or alternative lifestyles. The only people who benefit from that dynamic are those looking to normalize boundary violations.
Let me state it plainly:
Children who are not going to have sex do not need to be exposed to sexuality.
Period.
Any adult who insists otherwise is not confused. They are grooming.
Public Fetishism Is Not Liberation
There is a vast difference between being gay and demanding the right to simulate sex acts in front of children. Between being transgender and insisting on teaching kindergartners about breast removal. Between being proud of who you are and insisting the whole world observe your kink play in the street.
This is not diversity. This is decay.
Men in dog masks being walked on leashes by their lovers are not brave—they are forcing strangers into their psychodrama. This is exhibitionism, and when children are present, it becomes criminal exhibitionism.
We used to know this. Peeping, flashing, voyeurism—these were considered red flags. Dangerous behaviors. Early signs of escalation. Now they’re filmed, hashtagged, and funded by public grants.
Stop Calling It Love—It’s Entitlement
This is not about who you love. It’s about how you demand to be seen. If you need the entire public to witness, applaud, and adapt to your sexuality, you’re not a pioneer—you’re an emotional colonizer.
Love does not demand a captive audience. It does not parade past toddlers. It does not demand that schools teach four-year-olds about “preferred pronouns.” Love protects children. Love guards modesty. Love waits.
And if you can’t wait—if you need to be seen, affirmed, and obeyed—you’re not talking about love. You’re talking about power.
Consent Applies to Culture, Too
We teach children that consent is sacred—so why are we failing to apply that lesson to public life?
No child consents to drag queen story hour.
No parent consents to leather harnesses on city floats.
No woman consents to being exposed to male sexuality in the ladies’ room, or in the school library, or anywhere she cannot opt out.
Consent is not just for sex. It’s for everything.
Attention. Language. Presence. Ideology. Imagery.
And we are done pretending we don’t notice when it’s violated.
The boundary is back.
And we are drawing it in bold.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@MaxForIndiana If it’s legally allowed, then I’m all for it. At the very least, it will be a deterrent for anyone planning anything nefarious.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@RagingBull767 Apparently, today’s the day to drag dead people through the mud. OK.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@David_Mauricioo Democrats just don’t understand how a politician can do their job without telling the whole world what they like to do behind closed doors. Republicans already knew the man was gay, and we don’t care. This is not the gotcha The Democrats think it is.

[Elizabeth @ViewFrom72]

@adammocklerr So what? You are acting like nobody knew this already.