Ryan Young

[Design Arena @Designarena]

BREAKING: GLM-5.2 is now 1st on Design Arena.

With an Elo of 1360, GLM-5.2 has jumped ahead of the now unavailable Claude Fable 5.

And it's open weights.

This is an improvement of 4 positions and 27 Elo points to achieve one of the highest Elo scores in our code categories since Design Arena started.

Huge congratulations to the @Zai_org on the release!

[OpenRouter @OpenRouter]

Introducing the Fusion API, the smartest compound model in the market.

Fusion achieves Fable-level intelligence at half the price.

How it works 👇

[David Sacks @DavidSacks]

I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true:

— As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable.

— Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.)

— A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused.

— In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.”

— In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety.

— In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community.

— The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority.

— Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.

[Andrej Karpathy @karpathy]

This is a super exciting release - Claude Fable 5 is the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. The benchmarks are great and it's SOTA on everything by a margin but I'll add that *qualitatively* also, this is a major-version-bump-deserving step change forward (imo of the same order as Claude 4.5 was in November), peaking especially for long problem-solving sessions on very difficult problems. You can give it a lot more ambitious tasks than what you're used to, the model "gets it" and it will just go, and it's never felt this tempting to stop looking at the code at all (but don't do this in prod!). The model still has quirks that people will run into and the safeguards are configured to be a little too trigger happy for launch, which can hopefully be tuned over time.

I feel a lot of things changing as working software increasingly comes out on a tap. The Jevon's paradox kicks in and I feel my own demand for software growing substantially. You can ask for anything - explainers, visualizers, dashboards, bespoke single-use apps (e.g. a full wandb that is hyper-specific just for your project), you can 10X your test suite, auto-optimize code, run giant research projects with custom HTML for the results, anything! "Free your mind" (Matrix ref). Really looking forward to all the things people build!

[@jason @Jason]

Yes please

[Ryan Young @WRYoung]

@CryptoGodJohn Landman on Paramount

[Ryan Young @WRYoung]

@OpenAI Sora!?!?!?

[Ryan Young @WRYoung]

8/
The internet’s future depends on trust and transparency.
Or, we could just let AI bots handle it all—they seem to be doing a great job fooling us already.

#AI #TechInnovation #ArtificialIntelligence #FutureOfTech #Deepfakes

[Ryan Young @WRYoung]

1/
AI visuals have crossed the uncanny valley—and the implications are massive.
I explored this in my latest Substack post:
https://t.co/iE1Md2Wivp
Some highlights 👇

#ArtificialIntelligence #Deepfake #TechInnovation

[Ryan Young @WRYoung]

7/
But every leap forward has its shadows.
AI raises HUGE ethical questions:
Who owns AI-generated content?
How do we distinguish real from fake?

What happens when bad actors weaponize this tech?

[Ryan Young @WRYoung]

Apple FINALLY Upgrades Siri https://t.co/3F6jf1PgZV

[Ryan Young @WRYoung]

#AI #Filmmaking #GenerativeAI #Innovation #CreativeTech

[Ryan Young @WRYoung]

Read my article to explore how AI is about to disrupt the entire entertainment industry - Movies, TV shows, and even YouTube will look very different in the near future.

AI Video: Is Hollywood Toast? https://t.co/jQ6AekrS62

[Ryan Young @WRYoung]

Google’s ‘Project Jarvis’ is coming in December, but is this a step too far in the privacy department? https://t.co/ZYS9UCcQAB

#AI
#TechNews
#Innovation
#Automation
#FutureTech
#Privacy
#DigitalTransformation

[Ryan Young @WRYoung]

Is Coding Still a Superpower?

https://t.co/yMvGdZ2jqw