We💚Stoke Lodge

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

Come on guys, get it right. This account has nothing to do with @Justice4Cotham I mean I would tell you all but it appears you've blocked me, but I guess as long as you support free speech right 😂

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@j4_not @TristanCorkPost @StokeLodgePF @BristolPost It just gets better:

Paragraph 2: pretty much a admission of guilt that someone in your community is removing the fence panels.

The responses contradict the " we don't condone vandalism" Line.

Guys, your making this too easy

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@j4_not @TristanCorkPost @StokeLodgePF @BristolPost Question. If WLSL doesn't condone vandalism, why was the group laughing about the "sign fairies" back in 2019, and calling vandalism to the signs "art"

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@Justice4Cotham @j4_not @TristanCorkPost @StokeLodgePF @BristolPost It's fine, I won't get a reply from them as they know they've condoned and mocked it in the past. It doesn't fit the narrative they want to paint of them being "innocent victims of a corrupt system.

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

To paraphrase Hot Fuzz: "No luck catching the sock puppet Twitter creators then?"

"It's just the one actually"

I wonder who @BenBP7 is? @Justice4Cotham

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@DocMacci @Loui263 The Gif is funnier, so...

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@DocMacci @Loui263 Ah someone's looking for a fight. That's cute. Not today Satan.

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@watch1ngwaiting Also I see you chose to ignore the tweet I provide, for the evidence you couldn't find. Here it is again, in case you need it. Did WLSL members attend pride this year? As it's all a tad hypocrital if they did when one of their supporter says stuff like this.

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@watch1ngwaiting With the police forces stretched and budget cuts, you really want to waste tax payers money for someone who's cyber bullying and accusing innocent people. Maybe they should just be civil and stop?

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@watch1ngwaiting At the moment it's verbal abuse abuse and cyber bullying. Guess your being sarcastic with the police line. Nice November 2019 account btw.

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@watch1ngwaiting Like I said, the offer was made to the person who makes the accusations, see below. Not difficult to find. There are a few others aswell. So you approve of her reffering to innocent people as tightly closeted then?

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@DocMacci I, Doc, can/can't guarantee I have met the above twitter member.

I, Doc, will/won't stop abusing innocent people online and accusing them of being you.

All you have to do is delete the appropriate words from can/can't/will/won't. Simples.

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@DocMacci So going to ignore all the other points. So you can't guarantee you've met me then?

So will you stop causing penny, nathan, a PE teacher etc that they are me. As stated, you drive unneeded abuse their way?

I wrote you a temple so you stop avoid the question, please see below.

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@watch1ngwaiting @Justice4Cotham @MarvinJRees I disagree, clearly my identity has been a hot topic with Doc, as they have accused so many innocent people of being me, abusing the innocent when they have no proof. Like I said to Emma, this isn't about the WLSL, it's about getting the abuse towards innocent parties to stop.

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@DocMacci @EmmaBur60473847 @Justice4Cotham 4. And yet you can guarantee you have met me...surly the same logic would apply to your comments. Being rational.

So I ask you again, are you going to stop accusing people of being me until you know the truth? Or are you just going to make fun of not only staff, but LGBTQ+?

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@DocMacci @EmmaBur60473847 @Justice4Cotham 1. You haven't met me, so "previous meetings" BS makes no sense.
2. Yes, I'm not perfect, but please show me where I've name dropped innocent people.
3.I don't have issue with you not being there atm, a simple "I'm not in the country so I can't meet" would have been civil.

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@DocMacci @EmmaBur60473847 @Justice4Cotham Any comment on why you keep driving community abuse towards people that have nothing to do with this account? It's not fair on them, and it needs to stop. That's what this meeting would have done but if you want to continue to abuse and bully innocent people...your choice.

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@DocMacci @EmmaBur60473847 @Justice4Cotham 1. That's your choice, don't say I never tried to extend a olive branch.
2. Please stop name dropping innocent people then, it's not fair on them.
3. That's fine, you could have led with that.
4. I can guarantee you haven't, but I'll let you believe what you wish.

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@Justice4Cotham @EmmaBur60473847 Thank god someone got the reference! Was worried for a minute. But I think you'd need Edgar Wright to direct, I mean he does have more experience in the field. For the WLSL who haven't seen Hot Fuzz, he is the director #notasfunifyouhavetoexplainit

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@EmmaBur60473847 @Justice4Cotham Also, small side note, I said she in the previous post, I apologise, it should have been a gender neutral "they". @Justice4Cotham guess I'll still be Nathan, Penny, George, Ringo, Kermit etc to Doc and the Lodgers then. Oh oh, can I be known as 24601 from now on?

[We💚Stoke Lodge @WStokeslodge]

@EmmaBur60473847 @Justice4Cotham I was, a long time ago, I believe the official WLSL twitter said no. I extended a olive branch and it was rejected. This was a offer exclusive offer to Doc to prove my identity so she didn't keep accusing innocent people of being me, and people harassing them unnecessarily.