@Randall_Kent@chainlink Where is the flywheel revenue accrual effect KENT? Don't tell me Clarity, DTCC, Swift etc. The tokenomics is messed up that nothing of value accrues as buybacks or any significant buy pressure.
$LINK token not needed until price action proves otherwise.
$LINK Chainlink Labs @chainlink is actively deleting any comments and questions on tokenomics concerns, revenue, and long term $LINK viability.
CLL Employees are likewise blocking users who ask questions ๐จ๐จ๐จ๐จ
Something bad is about to happen!!
@ARiHBARi@chainlink They wonโt tell you but go ahead ask Chris Barrett for his Strava PRs and Rory for a PFP generator.
Truly the best of ChainlinkLabs ๐จ๐จ๐จ
$LINK frustrations. Questioning Chainlink Labs will get you blocked. Poor comms, poor leadership. Zero transparency on tokenomics and revenue questions.
Truth > Trust slogan, but when it comes to them: โtrust me brahโ
I love LINK and Iโve been DCA for years, average price $17.74 but damn the wait is starting to kill me. I canโt even imagine a price thatโll make it worth it in the end anymore.
@CryptoMichNL@Bitwise Chainlink is a great technology. The ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca token is absolute dogshit of a tokenomics product.
Know the difference
@BajaDavidlak Chainlink has forgotten about community. It is now acting like a pre-IPO tech startup and has hired shams, tech bros, and H1B pajeets from SF to move it forward.
Wrong choice. Big Serg will fail ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca
@TheLinkPanda ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca I have 10x that in the last 7 years and still broke as hell link wise.
A suicide stack ainโt what it used to be.
@thegraphers@AndrewMcMarkets Andrew cannot change anything. The core tokenomics flywheel mechanism has to change. $LINK
Imagine booking millions in revenues and only funneling 0.01% of that to token buybacks. It wonโt work.
If your protocol needs Clarity etc to work, itโs fucked
@coinfessions $LINK truths
1. Token accrual mechanism is completely negligible at current revenue volumes to create any positive price impact. Token not really needed.
2. Chainlink Labs will block you and gaslight you for asking revenue questions. Poor comms and leadership tbh.
@ronniemgreen Basic $LINK question from a fren to another fren:
If the link token is the expression of $LINK revenue accruals, why is very little value flowing into the token?
A. Tokenomics is sub-optimal
B. There is no revenue to accrue
CLL success is pure conjecture atp
@TheLinkPanda Basic $LINK question from a fren to another fren:
If the link token is the expression of $LINK revenue accruals and its value as a company, why is very little value flowing into the token?
A. Tokenomics is fucked
B. There is no revenue to accrue
@cbusfritz Chainlink labs is accruing all the value. The token is accruing a very minimal value not enough to generate any kind of flywheel effect for the token to go up.
@obliiviiscariis I have been blocked by @chainlink for asking the right tokenomics questions.
CLL is not $LINK. There is no flywheel effect that accrues any significant value to the token at the moment.
Will that change? Who knows. They operate in secrecy. Cult.