@JudiciaryGOP Biden-Harris Admin Misused Taxpayer Dollars to Fund Anti-Netanyahu Organizations
Of the 6 NGO’s listed, Soros funded:
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors: $41+ million
PEF Israel Endowment Funds: $7.6 million
Per @DataRepublican’s Open Society Foundations grant database:
Meanwhile, babies across New York continue stubbornly insisting on saying “mama” and “dada” instead of “gestating parent” and “non-gestating parent.” The revolution remains stalled in the nursery.
Recently, NY had several propositions on the ballot. It was near impossible to find the actual propositions. But, it was easy to find the "summary" of those propositions on several NY gov. and other voting related websites.
The Problem: The summaries were inaccurate and incomplete. They misrepresented the proposition purposely to get us to vote a certain way.
Solution: What can we do to make summaries accurate and complete, and access to the actual proposition easy?
Breaking: A day after the October 7th attack, while bodies of young dead girls were still lining the streets of Israel, DSA candidate @DarializaforNY led a rally in NYC that celebrated the attack https://t.co/9w1N3FzMSh
@VickieforNYC Any way to tell city council that we want it back? Did they remove it because Jefferson is a founding father or because a man named Levy donated it?
The recurring distortions, against what Sec. 224 of the FY ‘27 NDAA text actually says and is designed to do, occur in three places.
First, the disinformation around “merging” or “integrating” the two militaries and “combining arsenals” is patently false. The operative work of Sec. 224 is the Secretary of Defense designating an agent per DoDD 5101.1 for “synchronizing cooperative efforts between the United States and Israel, to expand and accelerate bilateral defense technology research, development, testing, evaluation, integration, and industrial cooperation.” So “integration” in the NDAA means integrating technologies into U.S. systems and programs of record, not integrating forces, command structures, or personnel. There is no shared command, no operational subordination, no joint force. Subsection (a) is an R&D-to-procurement coordination function, not a unification of the two militaries. Anyone using “merger” is manufacturing out of whole cloth a meaning the statute does not carry.
Second, the circulating narrative that Sec. 224 “gives Israel access to U.S. military data” reads subsection (b)(8) backwards. “Network integration, data fusion, and contested logistics” is one of ten enumerated technology domains for cooperative development, alongside directed energy, counter-UAS, biotech, etc. It authorizes joint work on data-fusion technology. It is not a grant of access to U.S. operational networks or datasets, and nothing in the text creates such access.
Finally, the whole “minimal oversight,” “shielded from the appropriations process,” and “less transparent” lines cut the opposite way on transparency: an interim briefing at 180 days (d), an annual report to the congressional defense committees through 2030 (e), unclassified form with optional classified annex (f), and a mandated public DoD website with periodic unclassified updates (g).
Summary of SEC. 224 (pp. 40-44) of FY ‘27 NDAA
It directs Secretary of Defense to designate a DoD Executive Agent (per DoDD 5101.01) to synchronize and accelerate U.S.-Israel bilateral defense technology cooperation across R&D, testing, integration, and industrial production.
The executive agent’s tasks.
Identify Israeli-origin or jointly developed tech for integration into U.S. systems and programs of record; protect sensitive technology in collaborative research; move technologies from R&D into procurement/acquisition; build frameworks for joint ventures, licensing, and U.S.-based co-production with Israeli industry; coordinate across listed DoD components (IWTSD, USD(R&E), DIU, the U.S.-Israel Operations Technology Working Group, DARPA, MDA, SPACECOM, the military departments, etc.) to avoid duplication; and promote joint exercises and information-sharing.
Ten authorized cooperation domains.
1. counter-unmanned systems
2. anti-tunneling subterranean
3. missile and air defense
4. AI/quantum/ML/autonomy
5. directed energy and advanced sensing
6. cyber/EW/digital resilience
7. biotech/biomanufacturing/medical defense
8. network integration/data fusion/contested logistics
9. defense industrial base and co-production
10. and other emerging tech as mutually agreed.
Coordination and reporting.
Secretary coordinates with State, Commerce, and other agencies for legal consistency. An interim briefing to the congressional defense committees is due within 180 days (covering the agent, department-wide coordination status, initial technology areas, and early transition/prototyping activity). An annual report is due within 1 year and yearly thereafter until 2030, covering activities, progress, interagency collaboration, technologies transitioned into acquisition, industry partnerships, and future recommendations. Reports are unclassified with an optional classified annex, and DoD must post periodic unclassified public updates to the maximum extent practicable while withholding anything that would compromise OPSEC, export controls, or sensitive technology.
PDF src: https://t.co/lrVTZ5ffIA
@createcraig@NYCMayor It's one thing to lose Jews and rich people...but they are only the beginning; this mayor was not ready to show his intention to discard Latinos and other communities of color, too.