The days of climate inaction due to #Nuclear fear are over. Join @canadiansenergy to support CANDU & SMRs to fight climate change, keep our air clean, produce medical isotopes & create a green recovery! 3600 Canadians have signed the petition, will you? https://t.co/g12ehyf607
HOW TO SOLVE NUCLEAR WASTE:
1. Collect the spent fuel
2. Put it in an iron container
3. Put that in a copper container
4. Put that in a hole surrounded by clay...
5. ...Deep in stable granite.
Done.
Note: we can store it above ground but this is one failsafe way to bury it.
@NotEnergyBlind@cadlam@MikeMcL00531595 There is absolutely, 100%, without a doubt, a plan for used fuel storage. Selecting a site is literally part of the plan; the part that’s currently being done actually. Repeatedly claiming there’s no plan is extremely dishonest.
CANDU nuclear technology is essential to continuing to move towards a net zero future.
Sign and share petition to include CANDU in Clean Technology Investment Tax Credit here: https://t.co/M6I2aFjuay
@AlbertaNuclear@ONcleanair I can’t see the original tweet from OCAA because they blocked me for challenging their frequent lies. That tells you enough about how honest and informed they are on the topic of nuclear….
But few civilizations have lasted longer than 500 years. What do we do about the long lived radioisotopes?
We can move waste from civilizational to geological time scales by burying it in appropriate geology. Should we?
Stay tuned for my next thread on geologic disposal...
@energybants@Beazy_Rampezy@MadiHilly I don’t think these decisions are early at all! They have been studying geological disposal for decades to ensure it’s the best thing to do.
@AngieSath@MadiHilly Exactly! What we do is perfectly safe, for now! As long as we have a reliable regulator and a stable government. And of course no major climate upsets in the next….1,000,000 years or so..
@SmartandSassy11@AlbertaNuclear I understand there was no consultation when the plant was built. That doesn’t change the fact that the waste is here now and needs to be dealt with in the safest way possible.
@KIVUNature@SmartandSassy11 The “no” for the opg project was final. The project was cancelled. This is a different project, for different waste, in a different location. Solid ceramic pellets can’t leak.
@SmartandSassy11@AlbertaNuclear Having issues trusting the industry is understandable, just like it’s understandable to not trust the government. We all want safety. We just need to be sure we know all the options and effects of those options and choose what is safest. I believe that is a DGR.
@spencerricearts@AlbertaNuclear@SmartandSassy11 The human factor of managing the waste is exactly what a DGR eliminates. That’s the entire point of planning and implementing geological storage; so safety is NOT reliant on humans forever.
@SmartandSassy11@coo77505195@zhaabowekwe How am I trying to scare you? By stating the obvious? The current storage situation cannot be guaranteed safe for eternity and relies 100% on humans being responsible. We all know how that generally works out.