@TheDivingPaaao A direct link to verifiable on-chain revenue, ideally just distributed to stakers, which clearly aligns the interests of both the team and community.
Earn Fees -> buyback VULT -> distribution.
Team become as incentivised to hold as the community.
@jpthor Buy and burn will likely only benefit a few who actively trade and absorb the benefits. Loses incentive to stake
Buy-back VULT and distribute as rewards adds the same buy pressure but gives everyone a share and (positive) feeling of passive income. Incentive to compound remains.
@Stoicsui@lionhead_king But your own research led you to believe it was a 10x supply increase, when it was only a 4x?
It went from 250mil to 1bil.
It's a protocol with $1mil+ annual recurring revenue sitting at circa $10mil marketcap.
Even modest revenue growth would suggest this is undervalued.
@NWD_Blockchains@zhizhye Okay, glad we agree on that then 👍 I thought you were proposing to leave the bridge until after the AOM raises, which I would strongly oppose.
@NWD_Blockchains@zhizhye I don’t believe AoM fundraising can have massive success without a bridge for capital in and out of the ecosystem. KuCoin and Ascendex are not good solutions and put up far to high barrier to entry.
@SyotoshiX @codegamedotfun @addicteddotfun I think @addicteddotfun might have messed up their distribution with the frequency and over-power of the OG Godfather seed. New players not making any income, so bearish until that’s fixed, if it’s not too late 🤷🏻♂️
@gavmarten@SteveReedMP Thought the same. They look like student halls with no desirable character to be proud of.
I hope that’s not reflective of all of them, but it seems they’re just incentivised to meet their quota, regardless of quality.
@NWD_Blockchains@Arsene29Dan9 Without the bridge, we can’t attract capital easily from outside ecosystems?
It also impacts AOM’s effectiveness as a flagship if there is such a big blocker to adoption like a bridge.
Bridge also opens up multi-ecosystem airdrop potential.
Bridge is essential in my mind
@Dagnum_PI@VOoOidb I don't think there's an accurate answer to that question, but perhaps more relevant is the rate of revenue growth.
$ALKIMI supply will be 2x by the end of 1 year (500m), so could you say that if we double the current revenue (to $5k/day), we're combatting the inflation?