xarnegie

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@MacroBombastic @EmanAbio @AlkimiExchange @SuiNetwork @WalrusProtocol https://t.co/NYGfjKZvzr

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@morgan_defi @EmanAbio @AlkimiExchange @SuiNetwork @WalrusProtocol https://t.co/NYGfjKZvzr

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@Jaileddotfun Code needed to enter?

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@Jaileddotfun Redeem

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@TheDivingPaaao A direct link to verifiable on-chain revenue, ideally just distributed to stakers, which clearly aligns the interests of both the team and community.

Earn Fees -> buyback VULT -> distribution.

Team become as incentivised to hold as the community.

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@SuiNetwork @AlkimiExchange

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@TheDivingPaaao @jpthor @vultisig If I could short Ledger & Trezor, I would

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@jpthor Buy and burn will likely only benefit a few who actively trade and absorb the benefits. Loses incentive to stake

Buy-back VULT and distribute as rewards adds the same buy pressure but gives everyone a share and (positive) feeling of passive income. Incentive to compound remains.

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@Stoicsui @lionhead_king But your own research led you to believe it was a 10x supply increase, when it was only a 4x?

It went from 250mil to 1bil.

It's a protocol with $1mil+ annual recurring revenue sitting at circa $10mil marketcap.

Even modest revenue growth would suggest this is undervalued.

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@NWD_Blockchains @zhizhye Okay, glad we agree on that then 👍 I thought you were proposing to leave the bridge until after the AOM raises, which I would strongly oppose.

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@NWD_Blockchains @zhizhye I don’t believe AoM fundraising can have massive success without a bridge for capital in and out of the ecosystem. KuCoin and Ascendex are not good solutions and put up far to high barrier to entry.

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@SyotoshiX @codegamedotfun @addicteddotfun I think @addicteddotfun might have messed up their distribution with the frequency and over-power of the OG Godfather seed. New players not making any income, so bearish until that’s fixed, if it’s not too late 🤷🏻‍♂️

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@Condxlencess @addicteddotfun Yep, those have come out too much, drop it to 50k power or the whole thing collapses 🤣

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@SyotoshiX @addicteddotfun Joined your code 🫡 Will throw a couple hundred in for the bants 🤣

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@jpthor @THORChain $SUI feels like a worthy contender to prioritise atm.

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@gavmarten @SteveReedMP Thought the same. They look like student halls with no desirable character to be proud of.

I hope that’s not reflective of all of them, but it seems they’re just incentivised to meet their quota, regardless of quality.

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@NWD_Blockchains @Arsene29Dan9 Without the bridge, we can’t attract capital easily from outside ecosystems?

It also impacts AOM’s effectiveness as a flagship if there is such a big blocker to adoption like a bridge.

Bridge also opens up multi-ecosystem airdrop potential.

Bridge is essential in my mind

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@Dagnum_PI You're on the 'Fees' not 'Revenue' section, where it's still number 9.

[xarnegie @Xarnegie]

@Dagnum_PI @VOoOidb I don't think there's an accurate answer to that question, but perhaps more relevant is the rate of revenue growth.

$ALKIMI supply will be 2x by the end of 1 year (500m), so could you say that if we double the current revenue (to $5k/day), we're combatting the inflation?