Yu Lin

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

@60Minutes https://t.co/2AXV6fmPhd

Patterned behavior.

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

I am here to expose an "old" market.
This would be
"""
What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping?
Iran
"""
FYI, the market "Graph" for this specific market is gone.

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

@MarioNawfal https://t.co/2AXV6fmPhd
Patterned behavior.

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

I am here to expose an "old" market.
This would be
"""
What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping?
Iran
"""
FYI, the market "Graph" for this specific market is gone.

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

@Nik_Poly @Teehbuddha @Domahhhh Learn the basics and then talk.
“all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone:which is the second death.”

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

@Nik_Poly @Teehbuddha @Domahhhh “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.”

[Digest Polymarket & UMA Discord @predictdigest]

UMA DIGEST — 18 JUNE 2026

⚡ Disputes

US-Iran Peace Deal (June 15) — Highly contentious. The market resolved YES despite Trump explicitly stating "It's not final, it's a memorandum of understanding," with the MOU only signed electronically on June 17. NO holders are vocal but the dispute window has closed and UMA votes are finalized (99.98% YES). Some are emailing [email protected] as a last resort. No mechanism remains to overturn.

Trump Physically Signed Iran Deal — Initially disputed by famouspet, arguing Bloomberg, Al Jazeera, and Iran's FM all confirmed only an electronic signature. aenews countered with AFP and a US official confirmation; usernamethr33 posted a video of Trump physically signing at Versailles during G7. famouspet conceded ("gg"). Market resolving YES.

Iran Airspace Closure — Strong YES case: NOTAMs confirm complete closure of all western Iranian airports including Shiraz (OISS) and Isfahan (OIFM) — exactly the two airports named in market rules — due to non-weather causes (drone/missile launches toward Kurdistan). Market was proposed YES, then disputed (allegedly by a large NO holder to stall). ronin331 and ferragamore argue evidence is overwhelming and a clean rules strike. pi7486 is calling on admins to settle. Market is currently extended and sitting at ~66-92c, with no substantive NO argument presented.

Trump Daily Insult Market (June 16) — Debated which quote qualifies: "Nobody ever heard of him" (about Sen. Jack Reed) vs. "Os(jerk!)off" (about Sen. Ossoff). laurleo proposed based on the Reed quote; mak_disc and ronin331 lean toward it qualifying. Market has a $500 bond due to a reward glitch at creation, limiting dispute reward to $125.

Football Player Props (Shots on Target / Live Blog stats) — Ongoing meta-dispute about whether live blog data is valid for proposing. im.the.wizard argues live blogs are not official final stats and cites a new UMA rule that all markets settle on final results. banhmichuoi and whosay8888 push back, questioning whether the precedent was legitimately set (alleging it may have been a self-dispute to manufacture precedent). Significant personal conflict between im.the.wizard and abhiz69 throughout.

ETH $1800 (June 17) — Proposed YES. Market opened 12:35 AM ET, price hit at 12:50 AM, UMA timestamp 12:52 AM. Community consensus: counts, rules say any candle 12:00 AM–11:59 PM ET, no dispute expected.

Given that the Iran Airspace market has overwhelming evidence but sits in limbo while someone disputes it purely to stall, should UMA implement a "bad faith dispute" penalty to discourage frivolous challenges?

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

@1confirmation Sure. Make your donation to permanent peace deal.

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

@Domahhhh https://t.co/2AXV6fmPhd

Obviously, they are targeting on large political markets.
It is not just UMA; Insider must have a play on this.

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

I am here to expose an "old" market.
This would be
"""
What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping?
Iran
"""
FYI, the market "Graph" for this specific market is gone.

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

@0xDinoCrypto https://t.co/2AXV6fmPhd

Everything on chain.

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

I am here to expose an "old" market.
This would be
"""
What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping?
Iran
"""
FYI, the market "Graph" for this specific market is gone.

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

@Teehbuddha https://t.co/2AXV6fmPhd

Not just one. Clear evidence on chain.

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

I am here to expose an "old" market.
This would be
"""
What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping?
Iran
"""
FYI, the market "Graph" for this specific market is gone.

[TehGoldenBuddha @Teehbuddha]

Poly is an insider trading scam platform.

Example: MSTR OR USA X IRAN PERMANENT DEAL!

This guys deserves to be in jail.

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

With all the "violation of integrity" evidence, the grouped activity, and the "clarification".
I would say it is not just UMA whales, but the Polymarket staff has a share in the matter.

It is obviously a POLYMARKET SCAM.
@ParetoPrincipl @willo2_Poly @0xDinoCrypto @Domahhhh @mustafap0ly @Autonomous_Chad @ceostroff @WSJ @BehindPoly @Kalshi @Polymarket @TRUTHONLYPOL @Teehbuddha

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

I am here to expose an "old" market.
This would be
"""
What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping?
Iran
"""
FYI, the market "Graph" for this specific market is gone.

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

https://t.co/SMm7N63R7c

Adding to that, "pre-recorded footage" qualifies in the other market, making me wonder what the standards are.

[Eternity @ParetoPrincipl]

We have 2 markets. Same rules - different clarifications.

Traders get screwed over. Let's sink into it.

First market — "What will Trump say during Fox Business interview on April 15?".

We have rules - "The resolution source will be video of the events. Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market's resolution."

And we have clarification - "Prerecorded footage from this interview will qualify toward this market's resolution if it is aired within timeframe."

Second market - "What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping?"

We have rules - "The resolution source will be video of the events. Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market's resolution."

And we have clarification - “only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market’s resolution.”

Markets have the SAME rules, but a different clarification.
It's a serious violation of market integrity.
It's impossible to traded fair when no can predict how rules of market is has to be meant.

The clarification on the market "What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping?" was issued WRONGLY, without due diligence.

We got totally ghosted by the Polymarket team.

Draw attention to this matter.
We expect Polymarket to refund the YES-holders of the market "What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping?".

[Yu Lin @YL7931]

@Polymarket Meanwhile, Polymarket shamelessly keeps fact-twisting events happening.