@reqrasp@5KHRS9 رويدك يا فتى، فكذلك الحديث الذي تضعه صورة لحسابك "أحسن" أسانيده من رواية عبد الله بن شقيق، وهو ناصبي فكيف تقبل روايته وتصححها؛ فهي مما تقوي بدعته.
على أن الحديث ضعيف لا يثبت، وليس هذا محل ذكره، وحسبك إعراض الشيخين عنه ...
@StrangerMentor@JannatMehmad07 Nope he said we and continue with saying rebeling against the legitimate emir is grave sin
And ibn abi bakr was wrong because nothing from quran and sunnah say its haram to elect ur son
Like when sulayman succeeded dawud (as)
@StrangerMentor@JannatMehmad07 'Ibn umar said and we have given the oath of allegiance to this person (Yazid) in accordance with the conditions enjoined by Allah and His Apostle
Bukhari 7111
If a sahabi say x is Sunnah then its true because they arr all trustworthy
@StrangerMentor@JannatMehmad07 Nothing from the quran and sunnah indicates its haram to choose ur son as successor this is why ibn umar said the bayaa of yazid was a bayaa according to allah and his messenger condition
@StrangerMentor@ahsardwd@alajamiyy But some go extreme like the shias they attribute being all hearing etc which is only allah can be do you agree this is kufr before hujja
@StrangerMentor@RealAbuisa But this look like ashari idea, we dont say the speech is eternal we say the attribute of speech is eternal but the action uncreated