Maritime ex-pat doing some left coast living with my incredible wife in the lower mainland of BC. Politics, green bldgs, math, science and funny stuff.
@alanfryermedia@globeandmail@TorontoStar Conservatives have been sticking it to one another well enough they don’t need help from the Globe/Star. Pretty ineffective opposition.
@BoredElonMusk You don't even need to put the whole data in the ocean though. If they're built near the ocean, you can put the condensers in the seawater, and reject heat to the ocean. The office building I work in does this. https://t.co/acYh2LUk3w
The question lies not in the Zhangs and Patels who arrive today, then, but in their sons and daughters, their grandsons and granddaughters, and so on.
Will they ultimately be seen by the Canadian demographic organism writ large as part of the greater "us?" And this is without accounting for the inter-cultural relationships of the kind I've already seen at scales well beyond obscurity. Anglo-Mestizo-ism as the new "ethnic Canadian?"
Because let me tell you that, for all of Laurentianism's deficiencies, and for all our (in my view, at least somewhat questionable) enclaves à la Brampton and Markham, successive generations born and raised here do, in fact, meld into a broader organism. Different ancestries, different cuisines, different roots, yes, but the same schools, the same sports, and broadly similar formative rites of passage.
The sons and daughters of Zhangs and Patels are, by and large, already approaching reasonable (if still imperfect) parity in being regarded as part of the greater body of "us."
The problem, of course, is that Laurentianism never asks what the sum of that "us" is actually for. And so we arrive at co-existence without co-ascent. The rites of passage exist, but they're not remotely demanding enough.
"Come from all corners of the world, live in peace, harmonize as you wish, and leave it at that."
That's not remotely good enough. And so it should not surprise us that it is precisely these sons and daughters of our Zhangs and Patels, the best and brightest of them, that tend to become our highest-profile brain-drainers.
I suspect that the real crux of the "ties that bind" question will ultimately resemble the philosophical challenge that confronted the integration of non-Italic Romans, non-Turkic Ottomans, and so many other civilizational projects before them.
What those shared metaphysical, symbolic, even esoteric "We The North" rituals might be, or what form they might eventually take, none of us can know today.
But can such a binding civic myth be cultivated within a liberal-democratic order, without some combination of conquest, subjection, or coercion?
That's a genuinely difficult nut to crack.
It's also one of the questions I am most interested in exploring.
In 2006 a high school English teacher asked students to write to a famous author & ask for advice.
KURT VONNEGUT (who left us 19yrs ago today) was the only one to respond.
His reply was a doozy.