I wonder if wind-down might even start 4 hours before bed. What say you?
In addition to avoiding blue-green-white led / overhead, stop eating earlier, and avoid excess hydration late. Avoid strenuous activity, physiologic and emotion stressors in this window.
See what that does to your sleep (in addition to sleep hygiene/ grounding mat) the next morning; you might be pleasantly surprised with how helpful respecting low cortisol window is at zero cost. 🤔
@PeterDiamandis How about a robot understands anything, much less physics?
Maps not same as territory.
All (amazingly complex) map, zero territory.
Category error.
Mimics consciousness; never conscious.
Narcissistic personally disorder and irrational fear of death / missing out on living in present? 🤷♂️
Btw, “dashboard” readings of age are not age. Biological aging is more likely loss of ATP generating capacity, not ITOA. When he claims telomere length or epigenetic aging or any “markers of aging”, he knows not what this actually means (he is not alone in misunderstanding categories).
He (and most establishment medicine) is mistaking map for terrain.
Why do flighted birds have up to 10X maximum lifespan compared to rodents same size?
Answer to question may be clue to expanded healthspan
(hint… mitochondria might be involved)
Metabolic Hypothesis of Aging in link 👇
@BretWeinstein So, I think the way you might do it is to look at flighted bird evolution. 🤔
… and change hypothesis of aging.
Not oxidative model; not ITOA; not “AI”
@BretWeinstein So, I think the way you might do it is to look at flighted bird evolution. 🤔
… and change hypothesis of aging.
Not oxidative model; not ITOA; not “AI”
It will take forever.
AI compute is very powerful, sophisticated map; it is not terrain.
Only a terrain entity (conscious agent) can drive AI compute (*** could be the system designer(s) and/or system user).
To the extent a map mimics terrain it is the creators consciousness(es) behind the illusion.
Consciousness does not emerge from compute; it is the other way around.
It will take forever.
AI compute is very powerful, sophisticated map; it is not terrain.
Only a terrain entity (conscious agent) can drive AI compute (*** could be the system designer(s) and/or system user).
To the extent a map mimics terrain it is the creators consciousness(es) behind the illusion.
Consciousness does not emerge from compute; it is the other way around.
In my experience treating geriatric ophthalmology patients it is undeniable that we are aging at different rates.
Question is not if, but why? 🤔
Biological age is not primarily determined by laps around the sun or informational decay alone imo.
Here is my hypothesis:
1. Usefulness of compute is asymptotic. Free, local open source AI w agentic AI may already be sufficient for most common human purposes privately? If so, just need to write the specs.
2. Energy constraint is for frontier race, not local inference. Amazing what you can already do w current tech Mac mini. JEPA and other architectures further compress inference and training energy.
3. Ultimately winners are not landlords either; it is the real world businesses meeting human needs channeling unlimited free compute who win.
Elon still wins (along with many other people satisfying real world human values). Humans need communication (X, SpaceX), financial services (X), knowledge (X, Xai) transportation (Tesla), physical real world work (Tesla Optimus), exploration (SpaceX).
AI frontier race is fool’s game. Energy is interesting. Building energy for frontier AI race may be similar on surface to frontier model race; but w caveat that it can be repurposed to manufacturing which will always be energy intensive. Elon even had a great idea for AI frontier energy: 24/7 space based solar. But, unlike earth/moon/mars energy, not easily repurposed when you hit the asymptote.