Abū Dujānah ibn al-Malāḥ

Al-Islām will Rise — بإذن الله × Maldives × Retweets ≠ Endorsement

[Abū Dujānah ibn al-Malāḥ @_AbuMuhammad_]

May Allâh Bless Shaykh Ahmad Musa Jibril.

People say that he's from the Khawarij, but Shaykh Ahmad advises the Muslims not to be extreme in Takfir.

Anyone who lies against the Scholars of Islam, will be held accountable. It's called slandering.

[ミ 𝘚𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘳 彡 @miyadhu]

[ Mayl al-Nafs (The Soul's Inclination) Toward Something and Its Impact on the Mind’s Mastery Over It ]

When the nafs loves a particular ʿilm (field of knowledge), it achieves ḍabṭ (mastery) over it and excels in it. Thus, the love of knowledge precedes the act of learning, for the seat of love resides within the nafs, not the ʿaql (intellect).

Cultivating a fondness within the nafs and training it toward what one intends to instill in the ʿaql directly influences how the ʿaql grasps and solidifies that knowledge, as well as how it is executed and how much humanity benefits from it.

The nafs holds a dominant, absolute sway over the ʿaql; if the ʿaql is forced to absorb what the nafs neither loves nor desires, the nafs will divert the ʿaql from focusing on it, practicing it, or allowing the individual—and others—to benefit from it. This is precisely why we find many scholars and experts well-versed in vast fields of knowledge, yet neither they nor anyone else benefits from their expertise in a way that reflects the sheer volume of their ʿilm.

Conversely, there are individuals with far less ʿilm who prove to be vastly more beneficial with what little they possess.

Indeed, if the nafs completely detaches its passion from what the ʿaql carries, the utility of that knowledge is entirely paralyzed.

This explains why you find highly skilled experts in theology (dīn), medicine (ṭibb), mathematics (ḥisāb), and astronomy (falak) whose nufūs (plural of nafs) ultimately drew them away toward commerce, travel, hunting, or perhaps animal husbandry—such as rearing birds, camels, or sheep.

[ミ 𝘚𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘳 彡 @miyadhu]

There are certain sciences that must be accompanied by faith (īmān), particularly the religious sciences (ʿulūm al-dīn). Thus, an individual with weak īmān should only be given (fundamental religious knowledge) that is individually obligatory (ʿaynan) upon them (to keep to faith) and also whatever (portions of religious knowledge which) serves as a catalyst to strengthen their (already weak) faith.

As for exposing someone of weak faith to the deeper religious sciences beyond that threshold, it merely drives them to exploit it for worldly gain and to apply it inappropriately—such as arguing for the sake of argument (mumārāh), seeking superiority over others (taraffuʿ), and hunting for anomalous legal loopholes (al-shādhdh). In doing so, he harms both knowledge and its rightful people.

— Al-Ṭarīfī

[. @StrangerAthari]

Shaykh Bakr Abu Zayd - رحمه الله - said that: Among the statements of kufr which necessitates apostasy are:

❝Religion is the source of communal division and conflict.❞

❝Religion is for God and the homeland is for everyone.❞

[Abū Dujānah ibn al-Malāḥ @_AbuMuhammad_]

@AbdullahIbnal No, I do not make takfīr on them.

[Abū Dujānah ibn al-Malāḥ @_AbuMuhammad_]

A request to the Madākhilah:

Please go & ask the same questions regarding Ḥukm bi-Ghayri Mā Anzalallāh that you asked Shaykh Mūsā Jibrīl & Shaykh Abū Ayman to scholars such as Ṣāliḥ al-ʿUṣaymī, al-Shuwayr, & others like them. Record their answers and present them to us here.

[Ibrahim Al Ansārī @IbrmAnsari]

Twice on different days I was going to Asr prayer and your president was out campaigning. After Salat when I was returning home, he was still campaigning.

No respect for the call to prayer.

....except when done for a photo.

[Ahmad @Ahammadhaa]

There’s no way it can get any more dirtier, nor is there any way it can get any brighter.

An Organization that’s baatil & rotten from the start. Allah said:

“..and do not spy..” ~Al-Hujurat, 12~

But, all they do is defy this explicit command & spy on Muslims.

[Brother Unknown @BrotherUnknown0]

When I was influenced by the Madkhali Dawah over a decade ago, one of the biggest red flag was this exact topic that after Allah allowed me to comprehend, leaving this mental illness became an obvious thing for me.

The Shaykh may Allah preserve him, due to language barrier, wasn’t denying the statement of Ibn Abbas رضي الله عنه, rather its application in the scenario of changing the laws of the land. The Shaykh said that the statement of Ibn Abbas is applicable when the Khalifah rules by Sharia, and a judge does not rule by what Allah revealed in a specific matter. When the Shaykh said it’s not authentic, he clarifies in this audio itself that it’s not authentic in application to ruling by man made laws.

The caller on the line deceptively says that when 'Abd al-Rahman ibn Zayd ibn Aslam رحمه الله and Ibn Taymiyyah رحمه الله in one of his statements pertaining to this issue said that the one who rules by another law, while believing it to be from Allah, has committed Kufr equates to anyone otherwise ruling by man made laws not committing kufr, is wrong and applying deception on his part.

Nowhere did those scholars say the latter addition which he added, that ruling by man made laws is not kufr. That’s the caller’s own assumption which he’s putting out.

InshahAllah now I will explain the difference.

Example 1:

If X did not fast in Ramadan, X is a sinner. But if X does not fast in Ramadan while believing he is not obligated to fast without any Shar’i excuse, then he is a kafir. So the Istihlal of not fasting made him a kafir here, while simply not fasting out of laziness and desires was a sin. This is how the “istihlal” part comes into play in not judging by what Allah revealed.

Example 2:

X fasts in Ramadan, but for other than Allah. X fasts for the sake of Ganesh, the elephant idol; X is now a Mushrik for committing Shirk, since nobody can have any share in something that solely belongs to or is done for Allah. This is similar to one legislating a law other than the law of Allah, such as man made laws contradicting the Shariah.

The lack of comprehension between the general umbrella term of “not judging by what Allah revealed” vs a specific “ruling by other than what Allah revealed/ man made laws” is a gateway to zandaqah.

[Abū Dujānah ibn al-Malāḥ @_AbuMuhammad_]

👂

[ابن ابراهيم @_ibnNuh]

An old audio of Shaykh Saalih Aal ash-Shaykh in a sitting with Shaykh al-Albaani speaking about governments that protect & approve of idols, Tawaghit & Shirk.

[Ibrahim Al Ansārī @IbrmAnsari]

How to disbelieve in the Taghut of Democracy and Secularism.

Shaykh Ali ibn Khudayr Al Khudayr (may Allah free him) said in Sharḥ Kitāb al-Ḥaqāʾiq fī al-Tawḥīd:

It is essential to disbelieve in the ṭāghūt; a person is not called a Muslim until he disbelieves in the ṭāghūt. Even if someone says “lā ilāha illā Allāh” with knowledge and truthfulness, having knowledge that includes sincerity and certainty, abandoning shirk, submitting, accepting, loving, and intending,.yet does not disbelieve in the ṭāghūt, then he is never considered a Muslim. It is not possible for him to be called a Muslim until he disbelieves in the ṭāghūt.

Disbelief in the ṭāghūt consists of five matters. The term “disbelief in the ṭāghūt” applies to one who possesses these five things:

Believing in the falsehood of worshipping the ṭāghūt.

1. Abandoning it, i.e., abandoning the worship of the ṭāghūt.

2. Hating the ṭāghūt and

3. showing enmity towards it. (These are three matters related to the ṭāghūt itself.)

And two matters related to the people of the ṭāghūt:

4. Hating the people of the ṭāghūt.

5. Declaring them disbelievers (takfīr of the people of the ṭāghūt).

A contemporary example: democracy is a ṭāghūt.

In order to disbelieve in democracy, and thus be considered one who disbelieves in the ṭāghūt, it is necessary:

First: To believe in the falsehood of democracy. This is an action of the heart and a characteristic of disbelief in the ṭāghūt.

Second: To abandon it, i.e., to leave democracy. This is an action of the limbs.

Third: To hate it in one’s heart, meaning to hate democracy. This is an action of the heart. One must hate it, wish for its disappearance, and show enmity towards it.

Fourth: Regarding its people, one must hate the people of democracy, saying “I hate the democrats,” and harbor hatred for them.

Fifth and finally: To declare them disbelievers, those who believe in democracy and what it contains are disbelievers, so one must declare them as such.

Likewise, secularism is a ṭāghūt, because the term ṭāghūt applies to ideologies, systems, doctrines, individuals, and even inanimate objects, whether male or female, everything can be called ṭāghūt.

Secularism is a ṭāghūt:

1. You must believe in its falsehood.

2. Abandon it.

3. Hate it.

4. Hate its followers (the secularists).

5.Declare them disbelievers.

Whoever does not do this has not disbelieved in the ṭāghūt and is not a Muslim.

Similarly, corrupted Judaism, this altered deen, as well as contemporary Judaism; the Jews, and likewise the Christians, Jews and Christians are ṭawāghīt, and so on.

These are foundational principles, and the rest can be measured accordingly.

Nationalism is ṭāghūt, Ba‘athism is ṭāghūt, communism is ṭāghūt, and man-made legal courts are ṭāghūt. One must believe in their falsehood, hate them, oppose them, and declare their followers disbelievers, and so forth.

[Abū Dujānah ibn al-Malāḥ @_AbuMuhammad_]

Jihād has been abandoned in the ʾUmmah hasn't it?

[. @StrangerAthari]

Shaykh Ibn Bāz - رحمه الله - said:

If jihād is abandoned in the Ummah, it is permissible for an individual to join any group that has arisen to fight in the path of Allāh, supporting the Mujāhidīn under their banner.

🏴

[. @StrangerAthari]

ʿAllāmah ʿAbduraḥmān al-Barrāk - حفظه الله - was asked in 2013 about those doing jihād in ʿirāq are they from the Khawārij as the “Salafīs” claim?

He replied: They are doing Jihād, who doubts that?

[Brother Unknown @BrotherUnknown0]

Who wears a cross to honor the “Queen” of England?

[ad-Da’wah as-Salafiyyah @PiousCall]

📌 Imam Ibn Al Jawzi in his tafisr said on ayah

"Whosoever does not Judge by what Allah has revelaed it is indeed they who are Kafiroon"

There are two opinions of Kufr here

1- It is disbelief in Allah
2- It is kufr that does not expel one from Islam

[مسلم @FirmlyUponHaqq]

The Wassekh

[. @StrangerAthari]

Imām Aḥmad - رحمه الله - was asked by the Jail guard: Am i among the helpers of the oppressors?

He said: ❝The helpers of the oppressors include those who cut their hair, wash their clothes, prepare their food, and buy and sell for them. As for you—you are one of their own.❞

[. @StrangerAthari]

A life changing statement i read from Ṣāliḥ al-Fawzān - هداه الله -

❝So referring judgment to the Sharīʿā of Allāh is not merely for seeking justice; rather, first and foremost it is an act of worship of Allāh, a right belonging exclusively to Him, and [a matter of] creed.❞

[Abū Dujānah ibn al-Malāḥ @_AbuMuhammad_]

@UnknownRoy15233 https://t.co/faBcPQsWPB

[Abū Dujānah ibn al-Malāḥ @_AbuMuhammad_]

@ZAID__MUSLIM If you're sincere, then watch this series. The first & second video will suffice.

The retraction you're referring to is not actually a retraction & that fatwā is not wrong, rather he was speaking about the specific judgments being Kufr Dūna Kufr & so on.

https://t.co/iSUFI1qkqD

[Abū Dujānah ibn al-Malāḥ @_AbuMuhammad_]

Āmīn, and may Allāh guide you too.

Shaykh Ibn ʿUthaymīn رحمه الله تعالى:

[Zaid @ZAID__MUSLIM]

Bruhhhhh 😑😑😑
"and is pleased with man made laws"

May Allah guide you...

[Zād al-Qulub @zadalqulubrsa]

May Allāh reward him Immensely! ❤️‍🩹

@sh_musa_jibril