@web3annie NHS robots may order a series of investigations but a human will apply a cost/benefit analysis and you will end waiting until the problem is frankly evident. At the same time the majority of the future health burden won't be complex rocket science it will be calorific input.
@MorEdge_Insight Not being a rocket scientist I thought at this stage a failure would be say - a drop in telemetry or some sensor packing in. Rocket engine engineering has been around for some time now. Are we really still at the stage where a new design may simply explode?
@mattwridley Perhaps Nature or careless experimentation killed 20 million people. Oddly enough I think the more important issue is how many biologists have the hubris to carry gain of function experiments. With total faith in their containment protocols, and believing the goals are worth it.
@ruthefordml There is a kind of symmetry at work as medics tend to imagine they could excel at everyone else's profession. Save perhaps lawyers, the only individuals that cause them a certain degree of apprehension.
@niftymitch@PorterPj85856@DrNeilStone The definition of "well contained" should factor in the risk of human failure. If a failure can lead to 20 million deaths worldwide then perhaps express confidence by building BSL-4 units on islands over a buried thermonuclear device.
@niftymitch@PorterPj85856@DrNeilStone In general, gain of function studies are carried out to enhance the virulence of a pathogen in order to understand the mechanisms behind the evolution of natural pathogens and how they come to be a health problem. A lot of debate among scientists about the ethics and hazards.
@MumofFatCassie Reasonable arguments - though only if we selectively ignore his appointment of Mandelson - which seems to suggest he is either seriously compromised or madly deluded. Certainly tone deaf.