Independent researcher formerly associated with the Iraq Inquiry Digest. Interested in the Iraq WMD saga, the Syria/OPCW controversy and the 9/11 'whodunit'.
@BinLadensRifle My take is that bin Laden was more of a pragmatist. He wanted change but not endless war. 9/11 was really about two things, American boots in Arabia and servile support of Israel. He thought that the Mujahideen approach in Afghanistan against Russia might work for a second time.
@MarkCatlin4@Tracking_Power Another Mason says it was a huge mistake to remove Gaddafi. That's really what put this whole thing in train. Woe betide the belligerent(s), because they never expect the repercussions.
@timtron2020@s_m_marandi There is only one set of truths there and it is very obvious who speaks them. The Zios are losing their grip and they become more desperate as days go by. The whole World now sees the reality. Desperate people with plenty to hide, lest the unraveling begins.
Have you never heard of the expression 'gallows humour'? It's meant to be taken as a joke and not taken seriously. The last line here is telling: "A 2017 study published in the journal Cognitive Processing concludes that people who appreciate dark humor "may have higher IQs, show lower aggression, and resist negative feelings more effectively than people who turn up their noses at it." https://t.co/dqmKWWLYCF
@hama_kavul55862@shoestring911 There are pieces of shredded aircraft all over the place there. Our friend willfully ignores this evidence, therefore he (?) simply spits nonsense at the memory of those who lost their lives that day.
@borealissaves@MandaGroup@IndigoChapters The Optimum home page seems to have the wrong link for the book. They appear to have used the Tibet/China one twice over.
@Merlin67684223 Isn't it kind of obvious that he needs to curry favour from the US administration and that he knows this full well? Hence the sucking up to Zelenskyy? And then of course he's going to have to somehow pay the devil's price?
@Merlin67684223@timtron2020@nxt888 Just look at the fall of the Roman Empire as a good comparison. Over-extension played a large part there. And look at Nero. They say he fiddled whilst Rome burned, fiddling being quite an fairly apposite word. Of course in this day and age he would just have played golf.
And I would add - empire always wants to paint itself as being under threat to convince its citizenry of its unifying nobility. WMD in its various forms, terrorism, or global ecological catastrophe, all are used to create a commonly felt fear-factor. The consequences of its actions then matter not. All for the greater good etc. When anyone challenges any of this they too get demonised and become an internal enemy of whichever state happens to be pumping out the most extreme nonsense. After all, who would argue against anyone who claims to a guardian against those who hate any particular freedoms, even if this means completely dismantling these very same freedoms as they apply to the vast majority of innocent others in far away places?
@SprinterPress Burnham knows full well that he has to play this game to gain any support he may be able to garner from the American administration. We'll see whether or not that in this case words alone carry more weight than actual actions.
I can see that all of this is being dragged out for as long as possible on purpose. And as much as I hate to write this, I do tend to think that the family members are being drawn in as pawns in a much bigger game. It's difficult to square away what some of them are allegedly expecting out of this when compared with how much a great many genuinely suffering veterans receive, through injuries not of their own fault. Yours is a massively litigatory (or litigational?) society, where usually the legal teams do far better than anyone else. The longer it goes on the more they get. Are the Saudis going to admit to something they didn't really have a hand in? Probably not. Are they going to blow the whistle on the CIA's internal workings and subsequent massive failings? Also probably not.
@timtron2020 This is the worst thing he could possibly do. He will not accept the inevitable and thinks Ukraine can still win. Far from it. He can only make the agony worse for all concerned. And add to an unpayable debt. Which will never be recovered.
What, even more coincidental than the fact that F77 flew into the Pentagon on a track that was only about one single degree from that to the Capitol Building had Hanjour overflown his primary target? That's about a chance of 1:360. Not every coincidence makes for a perfect conspiracy theory, go check Google Maps if you don't believe me.
@911Gene I briefly mention the same matter in my latest article, just published partly in response to last week's discussions at the War Room about AI (also noting that Aristotle got things badly wrong about the speeds of falling objects until his work was later corrected by Galileo and Newton centuries later!) https://t.co/LTwJqh3uvl