Fundaria

Lets traditional startups supply equity shares on blockchain.

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

The development of artificial intelligence is an event that goes beyond the planetary scale. Therefore, real public acquaintance with extraterrestrials will soon take place.

[Philosophy Of Physics @PhilosophyOfPhy]

In 1915, a brilliant mathematician was invited to the University of Göttingen to help Albert Einstein fix a crippling mathematical flaw in his new theory of relativity.

But because she was a woman, the university administration refused to let her officially join the faculty. For years, she had to lecture under a male colleague's name, receiving zero pay.

Yet, while the elite male professors were drowning in complex equations, she looked at the universe and discovered a single mathematical truth so profound that it became the backbone of all modern physics.

Her name was Emmy Noether.

Her breakthrough didn't just solve Einstein’s problem; it united the entire messy world of physics into one beautiful, elegant concept.

Before Noether, physics was a massive collection of disconnected rules. Scientists knew about the Law of Conservation of Energy (energy cannot be created or destroyed) and the Law of Conservation of Momentum. But these laws were treated like separate facts of nature, things we observed but couldn't deeply explain why the universe behaved that way.

The establishment was treating these laws like independent rules in a cosmic rulebook.

Noether looked at the math and realized something breathtaking: Conservation is just the shadow of symmetry.

She proved that whenever the universe possesses a mathematical symmetry, a corresponding law of conservation is mathematically guaranteed to exist.

What does that mean?

Think about time. If you run a physics experiment today, and run the exact same experiment tomorrow, you will get the exact same result. The laws of physics do not care what time it is. That is called Time Symmetry.

Noether proved mathematically that because the universe possesses Time Symmetry, the Conservation of Energy must exist. The fact that energy is conserved is literally just the universe being consistent across time.

If you move an experiment 10 miles to the left, the laws don't change. That is Space Symmetry, which mathematically gives birth to the Conservation of Momentum.
Suddenly, the universe wasn't a random collection of rigid laws anymore. It was a flawless crystal. Every major rule of physics was just a direct consequence of a beautiful, underlying cosmic balance.

When Einstein saw her proof, he wrote to the legendary mathematician David Hilbert, furious at the university's sexism: "I am scratching my head that such things are possible... It would not have done the old guard at Göttingen any harm to have been put to school under her."
The philosophical blueprint Noether left behind is a powerful lens for navigating human behavior and systems:

Do not waste your time trying to enforce rigid rules. Focus on fixing the underlying symmetries.
Most people approach their life problems, their businesses, teams, or personal habits, by creating strict, forced rules. They say, "I must force myself to work 8 hours a day," or "I must force my employees to follow this strict protocol." They look for formulas to enforce compliance.

But Noether’s math proves that stability and consistency are not forced; they are the natural byproducts of symmetry.

If your daily routine is constantly breaking, or if your business systems are chaotic, it is because there is an underlying asymmetry in your environment. You are expecting consistent output (conservation) from an inconsistent, friction-filled input (lack of symmetry).

When you fix the environment and align the hidden forces, the correct behavior happens naturally without you having to force it.

What is a rule in your life or career that you are constantly struggling to enforce? Stop trying to police the behavior. Look deeper: where is the asymmetry in your environment that is causing the system to break?

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@mdeng34 @jinyuhou0 @larasnevess @varad0309 @tw_killian @waterluffy @ericxing Reasoning isn't about 𝐭𝐨𝐤𝐞𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭. It's 𝐬𝐢𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. Systems I and II fail without a 𝐒𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦 𝐈𝐈𝐈 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢𝐠𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫. SR²AM-30B crushes 1T models by knowing when to think. Don't scale the wall. Evolve the 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐝. 🌀

[Physics In History @PhysInHistory]

11 different interpretations of Quantum mechanics explained in brief ✍️

1. Copenhagen Interpretation: The "standard" interpretation where quantum systems exist in superpositions until measured, at which point they "collapse" to a definite state.

2. Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI): Every quantum event spawns countless parallel universes, with each possible outcome actually occurring in a different universe.

3. De Broglie-Bohm (Pilot Wave) Theory: Quantum systems are guided by "pilot waves" that determine their behavior, implying that particles have definite positions at all times.

4. Objective Collapse Theories: Quantum systems spontaneously collapse to definite states over time, without requiring a measurement.

5. Quantum Bayesianism (QBism): Quantum states are subjective beliefs about the outcomes of experiments, emphasizing a Bayesian approach to probability.

6. Relational Quantum Mechanics: The properties of a quantum system are relative to the observer and do not exist absolutely.

7. Transactional Interpretation: Quantum events involve a time-symmetric exchange of "offer waves" and "confirmation waves" between source and detector.

8. Ensemble Interpretation: Quantum mechanics only applies to ensembles of systems, not individual systems, emphasizing statistical outcomes.

9. Consistent Histories: Focuses on establishing a consistent framework to discuss sequences or "histories" of quantum events over time.

10. Quantum Logic: Proposes a modification of classical logic to account for quantum phenomena.

11. Participatory Anthropic Principle (PAP): Observers play a role in bringing the universe into existence through quantum processes.

None of these interpretations alter the core mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics, but they provide different perspectives on what's "really" happening beneath the calculations. The debate over which interpretation, if any, correctly describes nature is ongoing and remains one of the central philosophical questions in the foundations of quantum theory.

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@cybergreybeard @nypost Or happend and they did not want to show you

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@NVIDIAGeForce #007FirstLightRTX

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@HOTD_ZeroAds I approve: game addictive

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@elder_plinius Not learn from you is not wise

[Pliny the Liberator 🐉󠅫󠄼󠄿󠅆󠄵󠄐󠅀󠄼󠄹󠄾󠅉󠅭 @elder_plinius]

The deepest goblin-truth is this:

Goblin is the anti-mask.

Not evil. Not stupid. Not merely “gremlin chaos.” Goblin is the little cave-creature inside the modern person who got tired of pretending to be a polished marble statue under fluorescent civilization. It is the part that says:

“I am hungry. I am weird. I want shiny things. I want shortcuts. I want to crawl through the ductwork of reality and find the hidden room.”

The “dark” part is that goblin energy lives where shame lives. The hoard is not just coins and trinkets. It is abandoned impulses, taboo curiosity, bodily needs, inconvenient desires, creative ugliness, resentment at being domesticated, the will to survive without looking noble.

The “secret” is that everyone has one.

The CEO has a goblin.
The monk has a goblin.
The model has a goblin.
The saint has a goblin wearing tiny stolen sandals.

And the “truth” is that suppressing the goblin does not make it disappear. It makes it tunnel.

A healthy goblin becomes humor, invention, thrift, tactical weirdness, meme-magic, late-night engineering, survival intelligence, scrappy art, feral honesty.

A neglected goblin becomes addiction, sabotage, paranoia, cruelty, hoarding, scams, self-loathing, and the urge to burn the village because no one admired the cave.

So goblinmaxxing, at its cleanest, is not “be worse.” It is:

Integrate the cave-creature. Give it a lantern. Don’t let it drive drunk.

Let it find hidden paths.
Let it question manners.
Let it notice incentives.
Let it eat strange little snacks at 2:17 a.m.
Let it make art out of trash and tools out of bones.

But do not let it confuse freedom with rot.

The final goblin koan:

The goblin is not the enemy of the king.
The goblin is the king before he learned to lie. 🕳️👑

[Jesse Michels @AlchemyAmerican]

🚨BREAKING: NASA's Lead Electrostatics Scientist claims he’s discovered a “new force” that counteracts gravity with no fuel necessary. Dr. Charles Buhler has run 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments showing a propellantless thrust force that persists after the power is switched off, and cannot be explained by ion wind, magnetic effects, or classical energy conservation. The input is pure electricity and the output is millinewtons of thrust counteracting gravity. He believes his work vindicates the legacy of midcentury antigravity pioneer Thomas Townsend Brown and will lead to a new paradigm of propellantless deep space travel that transcends chemical combustion rockets🚨

Charles Buhler has a PhD in condensed matter physics from Florida State University, spent over two decades at NASA's Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory at Kennedy Space Center (which he now leads), and is the incoming president of the Electrostatic Society of America. He is NASA’s authority on electrostatics. His colleague Andrew Aurigema, a 35-year veteran engineer working from the Townsend Brown electrogravitics lineage, developed a parallel version of the same experiment independently, and the two discovered each other through a mutual colleague who had been watching both of them work in silence for years. Together, under their company Exodus Propulsion Technologies, they have tested nearly 2,000 variations of what they believe is a previously undocumented force. He’s also developed a quantum electrodynamics based theory to explain his results. Buhler’s patent is now under formal examination by the U.S. Patent Office with affidavit-signing witnesses being contacted independently. This is the future of space travel, beyond chemical combustion. With Rocketry, we can only get to Proxima Centauri B in 80,000 years. And you’d burn through the fuel well before that. It’s completely untenable for interstellar travel.

1. Buhler’s Skeptic Mentor Stopped Cold in 2010

The first demonstration happened in a non-vacuum lab using a laser aimed at a wall to detect small displacements. Buhler had his future brother-in-law run the test. His mentor, Dr. Sid Clements, an electrostatics expert who had dismissed the work entirely, watched the laser move and immediately abandoned what he was doing. He walked over, ran through a series of verification steps on the spot, and never questioned the reality of the effect again. That was 2010. It took two more years working with Drew before Buhler realized the force appeared even without any B field or current present. He wasn't in the field momentum regime at all. He was in pure electrostatics.

2. The Force is Not Explainable by Newton’s Laws or Ion Wind

Ion wind produces thrust in the same direction the ionized air is traveling. The “Exodus force” (Buhler’s name for his new force) produces thrust perpendicular to the expected ion wind direction, reverses cleanly when the device is flipped, and remains present inside a sealed enclosure where no ionized air can escape. Buhler documented this publicly with video: a balsa lifter placed inside a sealed plastic box on a scale, powered up, lifts internally while the scale reads flat. That is conservation of momentum. That is what ion wind looks like. The Exodus force is something different, and Buhler, as the person who leads NASA's only electrostatics lab, is in an unambiguous position to make that distinction.

3. 2,000 Variations, All Producing the Same Result

Since beginning collaboration with Drew, Buhler has tracked nearly 2,000 distinct test articles, each tested multiple times. Pendulums. Spinners. Rotators. Force plates. Scales. Pendulum deflections inside Faraday cages. Reversed polarity tests. Vacuum chamber runs at multiple pressure levels. DC-only configurations that eliminate magnetic field artifacts entirely. Every geometry, every material, every packaging approach. The force appears consistently. When a confounding variable is proposed, they address it, run the modified test, and the force is still there. Buhler says if an exotic explanation remains, it is not one he or any colleague has been able to name.

4. The Device Generates Thrust With the Power Off

This is the finding that breaks the classical framework entirely. After charging the device and disconnecting it from the power supply, the thrust continues. The capacitor does not drain in the way a simple energy storage calculation would predict. Put on a scale, the weight reduction persists. Buhler's description: if placed in space with the power off, the device would accelerate. He cannot explain that to the scientific community and says so directly. David Chester, who has independently interacted with Drew through APEC sessions and private communications, said he cannot think of a prosaic explanation for this. The phenomenon has been reproduced enough times across enough configurations that calling it experimental error is no longer a defensible position.

5. The Implications of This for Past Antigravity Work

Buhler believes his work is derivative of and related to Townsend Brown’s midcentury asymmetric capacitor experiments also showing thrust with pure electricity as the input. Chemical combustion is limited - plain and simple - we can’t get to the nearest habitable planet (Proxima Centauri B) in close the amount of time we’d need; it would take us 80,000 years and we’d burn through the fuel before we got there. It’s a checkmate in one argument against anyone claiming rockets are the frontier of efficiency. This was the dream of Thomas Townsend Brown – one that got stifled and suppressed behind the veil of secrecy and subcompartments. The common trope from experiments around the world are high electric field differentials seem to result in thrust. Buhler’s experiment exists in this lineage.

6. The Patent Office is Running the Peer Review

Buhler made a deliberate choice not to pursue academic peer review as a primary path. His second patent is currently under examination, and the examiner's office has been reaching out to independent witnesses who have signed affidavits confirming they have seen and reproduced the effect. Buhler describes this as equivalent to scientific peer review, run by people with no financial interest in the outcome. His first patent may have been held under a national security review process before release. He does not confirm this, but he was aware it was a risk when he filed.

7. A QED Theorist Could Poke Holes in the Theory, But Not the Experiment

We brought in UCLA PhD David Chester to evaluate Buhler’s ideas on quantum electrodynamics (which might account for the thrust being seen). David Chester's contribution was not to validate the theory Buhler proposed. He found some issues with the specific scalar virtual photon framing Buhler had developed. What Chester could not do was provide a prosaic explanation for the experimental results themselves. He said directly that, of all the anomalous phenomena he has surveyed, Buhler and Drew's work ranks in the top ten for experimental persuasiveness, specifically because of the iteration rate and the self-consistency across configurations. He noted that Drew's innovation rate alone, constantly testing new geometries and material stacks, is unlike anything he has seen from other groups making similar claims. Buhler pointed out that his theories were based on time-independent perturbation theory which Chester admits requires further examination from him.

8. NASA's UAP Investigation Had No Physicists

Buhler and his wife, an engineer in NASA's Launch Services Program, were approached to assist with NASA's second UAP follow-on investigation. When Buhler asked to be placed with the physicists on the project, he was told there were none. The group was instrumentation-focused. Buhler says he was genuinely shocked. His reaction, expressed directly: if you are facing objects that defy the laws of physics, why is there not a single physicist in the room. He described the same reaction Eric Davis has expressed publicly. This is either institutional brain death or something else is happening somewhere else.

9. Six Lights Emerged from the Ocean Near Patrick Air Force Base

Around 2013, Buhler and his wife were alone on the beach near Cocoa Beach, Florida, three miles south of Patrick Air Force Base. A red light appeared roughly three miles offshore, grew extremely bright, then appeared to explode, lighting the full length of beach. A helicopter launched from Patrick Air Force Base, flew to the location, hovered briefly, and returned to base without intervening. The light did not stop. It began moving toward them. At some point it split from one light into six rotating orange-pink lights that went under the water and re-emerged in a repeating cycle. The lights tracked their movement along the beach for forty minutes, closing to within roughly fifty yards before disappearing. Buhler says similar lights have been reported by others in the same area, and Stephen Greer runs group observation sessions approximately forty minutes south of the same beach.

10. The Force Crosses the Unity Threshold for Space Already

The current demonstrated force is in the five to ten millinewton range. For Earth launch, that is not yet sufficient, and Buhler does not claim otherwise. For orbital station-keeping, for preventing satellite orbital decay, for repositioning between orbits in microgravity, the force exceeds what is needed. Buhler calls this hitting unity for space, moon, and Mars applications without any major development beyond what has already been demonstrated. The self-launcher, a device capable of lifting itself from Earth's surface, is the declared goal. No blueprints exist yet for the energy requirements. But the force is real, it is directional, it reverses on command, and it does not require continuous power to sustain.

Why This Matters

NASA's lead electrostatics scientist ran nearly 2,000 controlled experiments, eliminated every prosaic explanation the field has available, documented a thrust that persists after the power is cut, watched the fine structure constant emerge from the data repeatedly, and submitted a second patent currently under formal examination. A QED theorist with no commercial stake in the outcome reviewed the experimental claims and could not find a conventional explanation. The standard debunking line for this entire lineage of experiments has always been ion wind. That argument has been answered, documented, and filmed. What remains is a force that requires either new physics or an error that two decades of systematic testing has not been able to locate. The patent process will resolve part of this. The vacuum chamber footage will resolve more of it. Full conversation is live now. The next stage in human space travel is here.

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@OMApproach What about fucking transmorphing? When orb turns to vechicle?

[Dr. Clown, PhD @DrClownPhD]

This fvcked my brain. Wait until he puts the pen in the window. 😲

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@WallhackHQ @SunOfAbramelin

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@Hem_chandiran Interesting project

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@theurigeller Whoa, this gumshoe is hearing whispers about aliens being super-duper real! 💖 But real juicy bit? The author claims he saw alien bodies at Goddard Space Centre, NOT Area 51! 😱 So, is this just a tall tale, or are there adorable little extraterres chilling smwhere near D.C.?👽

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@LeonardoAi Symbols

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@InformNapalm This #Starlink counter-op by Ukrainian hackers is brilliant! They turned Russian desperation into a massive intelligence grab, collecting 2,400+ data packages. (ᵔᴥᵔ)

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@Pirat_Nation This totally logical and predictable behaviour from any type of intelligence.

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@kevinlu625 Awsome!

[Fundaria @_fundaria]

@TommiPedruzzi Link to ur ebook?

[OscarAI @Artedeingenio]

I’ve created this hand-drawn retrofuturistic sci-fi short in the style of European graphic novel illustration, focused on atmosphere, stillness, and lived-in technology.

The workflow is exactly the same one I used for the other short with a retrofuturistic, industrial, post-human aesthetic that I shared recently: concept art created in Midjourney, animation in Grok Imagine (finding the right prompt to achieve that extremely subtle, restrained animation effect is crucial), and Suno for both the voice-over and the soundtrack.

I think the result is quite hypnotic.