Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦

🎯

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@JayDyer Wine moms calling in after their third glass of Franzia

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@benzedrine76820 @Dhalzy30446008 @StefanMolyneux Do you understand the difference between a biological brain and the concept of the mind, let alone the self?

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@SteamerRolling2 @JakeLang She’s worse. I think it’d be far easier to shoot strangers from afar then strangle your own children one by one. Not even comparable.

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@TradAdvocate @JakeLang You are an absolute fraud, presenting yourself as an advocate for traditional non degenerate values, and yet here you are denying the undisputed fact that a demonic mother slaughtered her own children. You are worse and do more damage than the degenerates you fight against

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@SpencerPark78 @Timcast Kamala was going to codify Roe v Wade, ensuring the death of hundreds of thousands of babies every year, whilst Trump ran on overturning it. Anyone who cares about children had a very easy decision to make on who to vote for.

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@RealPunkJob @nicksortor Nah, two of them already caved, it’s apparently a 1v11 now. Stay strong soldier 🫡

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@Edward5482 @cherockss @122tim1 @CosmicSkeptic Whataboutism. Even if I couldn’t prove anything about the Bible or anything else in existence, it still wouldn’t make your position any less unjustified.

Again, what makes your assertion of what cruelty and evil is, true, and not just your own subjective viewpoint?

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@MGator9 @ColdblodedChrit @paleochristcon Was Andrew the one who threatened to beat the other one up, or to dare them to talk to him in person like that, or to bring up their childhood and attempted reputation destruction? Huh, must’ve missed that.

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@Edward5482 @cherockss @122tim1 @CosmicSkeptic That’s just an unjustified assertion. What makes it true, other than that’s what you think?

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@MestazZz @F1nalAtonement @TheOmniLiberal But no new being comes into existence at that point. The only being is the pre-existing baby that has merely begun to display signs that you ascribe value to.

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@Edfinch2pec @JayDyer Don’t expect legitimate replies if all you can do is strawman into oblivion

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@jospell4isu @human4christ @JayDyer @Rach4Patriarchy They both had earpieces on, to be able to hear the video clips

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@BroothHell5 @JayDyer @Rach4Patriarchy Even if he made the biggest possible fool of himself that wouldn’t magically give Candace a shred of evidence or a leg for her position to stand on. She couldn’t justify her claims and conceded on multiple key points. Optics don’t win debates, the actual contentions do.

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@formfx_ @RealAlexJones If he needs overwhelming evidence to believe that Tyler Robinson was most likely guilty, then how is any of that internally consistent? Underwhelming evidence would convince you only 20-30% for example, so if it’s overwhelming it’s perfectly logical why he’d consider 75-85%

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@ApocalypticOBS @BrianAtlas Whether any individual can “handle” it or not is irrelevant to the critique of this and other women’s behaviour.

Whether all men could handle this or whether they all crumble doesn’t change the justified accusation that this women and many others don’t know how to behave

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@anthropeusthai @Asdmaster01 @BrianAtlas I can also point to any literature that contains literally anything. That means or proves nothing.

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@Gregfar1 @jude4patriarchy @LibertyCappy He’s not disputing a difference in nature, he’s pointing a double standard for the same actions under the same circumstances

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@OscarUrdanet @travelingflying @Quade10724071 And trying to appease them is what feeds and grows the problem even further

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@fiddy_PP @travelingflying @TheAliceSmith Somehow this will be interpreted as a genuinely racist statement

[Jean-Pierre Snyman 🇿🇦 @_Jean_Pierre_S]

@jmkreider92 @TheTerribleTim @travelingflying The issue is not with the grammatical use of pronouns in normal language. It’s the ideology and identity politics associated with progressive preferred pronouns that they’re criticising. Don’t play stupid now.