A lot of new people to $TAO Bittensor this weekend -- if you're looking for a 'for dummies' intro, this fireside with the founder from last week is a great starter (if I do say so :) ):
Wonderful trip to the UK meeting our partners across industry, government, and academia. Honored to meet @Keir_Starmer and visit @Cambridge_Uni@imperialcollege and our @AMD teams. The UK has world-class research, exceptional talent and a vibrant AI ecosystem. Excited for what we will build together.
Current identity verification hands your personal data to centralized entities and hopes they protect it. @Web3Foundation documented data being compiled and sold without people ever actively using the services that profit from it.
Your identity online should be pseudonymous by default and never traceable. Proof of Personhood replaces the data handover with a cryptographic proof.
Prove you are human. Reveal nothing else.
Moonbeam painting the future: A world full of autonomous AI agents🔥
Full EVM compatibility, Elastic Scaling for compute, and Polkadot’s shared security + XCM for seamless coordination — Moonbeam is built exactly for the agentic era.
While others talk about AI, Moonbeam is positioning to power it.
The beam is aligning with the future🐝🚀
#Moonbeam #Polkadot $GLMR $DOT
There’s a lot I’d take exception to here, but
I’ll highlight two:
(1) the misinformation
Palantir does not own NHS data. We cannot use it, sell it, or move it. It stays inside each NHS trust, under NHS control, and the contract is the NHS’s to end whenever it likes. You may be right about NHS data being a goldmine, but it is not one Palantir can monetise, or would want to.
(1) the double standard
Your chief concern seems to be that Palantir’s contract with NHS is akin to letting “a foreign, state-adjacent company into critical national infrastructure.” You should apply this concern consistently then.
Yesterday, NHS England announced that 505,000 staff will get Microsoft 365 Copilot. The NHS also runs on Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services and Google. All are US firms. All have the same “deep roots in US defence and immigration enforcement” you mention with regards to Palantir. If US ownership, and having certain US government clients, are disqualifying tests, then surely these should apply equally to every such company?
Either US technology in the NHS is a sovereignty problem (in which case maybe the relevant news today is the 505,000-seat deal signed with Microsoft). Or it isn’t, in which case perhaps singling out Palantir isn’t really about sovereignty at all?
“Pointing an LLM at hundreds of disconnected, ungoverned databases gets you a system that hallucinates, is insecure, and unauditable. For something as consequential as our nation’s agricultural data, that is not just useless — it’s dangerous. The Ontology has been the key to delivering AI-enabled technology to every farmer in the country.”
At AIPCon 10, the USDA demonstrates how the Ontology now underpins national food supply security.
Every cycle has a chain that "everyone knows is dead" until it isn't.
$DOT just shipped a supply cap, an ETF, a full tokenomics overhaul, and elastic scaling. In one quarter.
But sure. Dead.
#Polkadot
Migrate from any system to any system.
Data, code, business process.
Harmonize, clean, archive on the way through.
AIP agents do the work. You stay in control.
The SAP Endorsed App is live: https://t.co/8JRFZrMNBW
🚨Narrative violation alert 🚨
Turns out the software the activists want kicked out of Britain is treating 110,078 more patients, cutting waiting lists by ~800,000, and costing £200k per trust per year.
@matthewlesh in the @Telegraph 👇