This is a pretty deeply bad idea. This doesn't help the government increase revenue (the nominal goal of wealth taxes), disincentivizes company formation and investment, sets up high-uncertainty time bombs for founders, and potentially sticks the government with extensive equity holdings in companies that are unsuccessful which it cannot unload. This is almost a textbook example of why people feel that the government is bad at capital allocation and the private sector is better at it.
Claude is NOT ready for prime time as a sommelier, I asked it to sort my cellar and it recommended a bunch of young Barolos and Latour for on-deck status and split a bunch of my verticals on age. Anthropic needs to hire a staff sommelier and RLHF it to develop some taste.
#AI can be a valuable tool and, at the same time, it calls for a measured and vigilant approach. The speed and simplicity with which practical assistance can be accessed undoubtedly makes life easier. Yet they can also encourage excessive reliance and the search for ready-made answers, and weaken personal creativity and judgment. #MagnificaHumanitas
there is no better time for companies to form an internal team to accelerate staff’s productivity. as engineers we always had the choice to “do the work” vs, “automate doing the work”, and today “automate doing the work” is extremely easy and scales outside engineering.
Peak Duchamp energy…the “Fountain” test in reverse. Duchamp asked if context could make something art , and @SHL0MS is asking if context can unmake it.
so much moralizing on that silly red button/blue button question for no reason; is the morally correct choice to destroy the blue button? if that seems right, as a corollary is the uk morally correct to ban smoking? something to ponder over