Frank

Defend the faith 🇻🇦

[Frank @abc198820]

Just ask questions.

[a. † 𓆝 @angelaramblings]

Oh to be a dusty medieval Catholic peasant who plowed the fields, ate gruel, went to mass, and had no idea what was going on in the Vatican

[Frank @abc198820]

@ThugLifeSproul @DineshDSouza You dont have to begin with human anthropology. This is a direct issue within the character of God. God is not in His essence love if the Calvinist understanding is correct. Calvinism is literal nonsense.

[Frank @abc198820]

@Kryptotajeer Its a shame the Quran affirms the Bible.

[Frank @abc198820]

@Ali10Amer I cant respond to every claim because I dont have premium, but literally, any person can go and watch the debate and see how much Libyano refuses to engage with Elijiah's actual arguments. Libyano is the same guy telling Muslims to believe Muhammed is the Son of Man 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Frank @abc198820]

@Ali10Amer Their debate was on the necessity of if God must be multipersonal. Do us a favor, if youre so confident in that narrative: clip the whole thing, and post it with no context so your audience can decide.

[Frank @abc198820]

@right2scripture @farmingandJesus This is in no way addresses the point because it presupposes all of your interpretations are the correct ones over the fathers. So in the cases that the fathers all agree, but you disagree, should I be taking their interpretation, or yours?

[Frank @abc198820]

@dawahxdialogues You literally believe men will have sex with recurring virgins for the rest of eternity when they die........

[Frank @abc198820]

@PhactCheckrr @farmingandJesus 'bUT thAtS NoT wHAt sCRIptuRE sAyS, I knOW hOw tO inTEPRet iT bESt'

[Frank @abc198820]

@BelteshazzarAD @farmingandJesus No, it literally isnt. Jerome compiled the vulgate of which it was his opinion that the deuterocanon was not to be apart of scripture. He then admitted that the authority of which it was to be included did not rest with himself in Against Rufinus. Please recant your lie.

[Frank @abc198820]

@Esoteric_Though @farmingandJesus 'When they are right' is based on your interpretation of scripture. When they intepret scritpure and come to a completely different conclusion, should I be trusting them or should I be trusting you?

[Frank @abc198820]

@farmingandJesus And the means by which you believe they are right is based on your interpretation of scripture. The Church Fathers would also think you are wrong on the areas that they also agreed with one another. Should I trust your 21st century interpretation? Or theirs?

[Pray The Rosary @PrayTheRosary]

Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us

[Frank @abc198820]

@right2scripture @farmingandJesus Yea, except ecclesiology and the Church Fathers are not to be opposed from scripture. How do you know which church fathers interpretation of scripture is the correct one? How do you know which Fathers to appeal to on particular issues?

[𝔻𝕣. 𝔾𝕣𝕠𝕪𝕡𝕖𝕣 🇻🇦🇺🇸 @TheeDrGroyper]

Jesus Christ, King of Kings

[Frank @abc198820]

@fawzydawah There is simply no way your reading comprehension skills are this poor.....this is an intentional and HORRIBLE misreading of Matthew. There is still time to delete.

[Frank @abc198820]

@farmingandJesus @theGUdGinge @JennyWakefiel12 Jesus literally became human.....so there is that....

[Frank @abc198820]

@ThugLifeSproul @CherylSchatz You are aware that Jesus loves His enemies, right?