@RICEKIT69@adelassalafi So which is worse selling fuel to usa and getting money in return? Or funding their genocides for free just so you can live with them?
@RICEKIT69@adelassalafi What are you even talking about bro😄 Yemen and Syria is irans handiwork iraq usa's as for Libya it was a complex situation cvil war broke out different countries backed different groups and militias
@RICEKIT69@adelassalafi You mean sell fuels? And you're giving money to them for free just so they let you be their loyal citizen and live on their lands
@RICEKIT69@adelassalafi What do you mean "allowed"? You think america was waiting for the permission of saudi arabia to invade iraq? Btw iran helped usa inavde iraq and Afghanistan
@RICEKIT69@adelassalafi Doing business with the kuffar is completely halal however paying taxes to the kuffar that directly fund genocides of muslims? Just to stay in their lands? How do you justify it?
Allah humiliated this criminal.
Every single one of his claims flew right into his face.
He rests in the dustbin of history.
He has the blood of innocent Syrian children on his hands.
Allah proved him a liar by liberating Syria from his gang of sectarian thugs.
There is a striking contradiction in the Muslim diaspora in the West.
Muslims who live as law abiding, tax paying citizens under the protection of Western states become intensely hostile towards an established Muslim state while romanticising an armed, non state faction fighting against it.
Why does this happen?
1. Distance changes political perception. Living safely under a functioning Western state makes rebellion look romantic. Only living through state collapse can teach you why institutions, sovereignty and monopoly of force matter.
2. They have developed a reflexive suspicion of the state. The government is presumed illegitimate while the armed movement opposing it is presumed to represent “the people.” The violence of the state is scrutinised while the violence of the rebel is rationalised.
3. “Resistance” has become a powerful moral category. Once an armed group is placed inside that narrative then its ideology, authoritarianism and attacks on civilians disappear behind the word resistance.
They demand the protection of citizenship, constitutional rights and the rule of law from the Western state in which they live while celebrating actors abroad who reject those same principles.
Fact of the matter is, if you have chosen to build your life as a citizen of a Western democracy, there is nothing contradictory about loving your faith and caring about Muslims elsewhere. The contradiction begins when you enjoy the protection of a constitutional government while wishing destruction upon every Muslim state that does not conform to your preferred ideology.
This BBC wording is astonishing.
This is not "Houthis vs Saudi🇸🇦 backed forces." It is an Iran🇮🇷 backed Houthi militia fighting Yemen's🇾🇪 internationally recognized government, a government the UK🇬🇧 itself supports.
The BBC can do better. Words matter, and so does accuracy.
@FullmetalTheist@UmarElhashmi@guywithlibrary What does that have to do with anything?
Seeing something does not require the thing to be a body occupy space have a direction or have physical dimensions
Seeing is a type of perception
We wont need rays of light to see in akhira for example
There is something fundamentally misleading about this headline. This is a war in Yemen, between Yemeni forces. Referring to one side simply as the “Houthis” while defining the other as “Saudi-backed forces” creates an obvious imbalance in framing.
If foreign backing is relevant to the headline, then be consistent: Iran-backed Houthis and Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces. Otherwise, call them what they are: the Houthis and legitimate Yemeni government forces. #Yemen
Iranophile Rulebook 101:
Iran striking Gulf states = Resistance
Gulf states responding = Zionist aggression
Zanabioun attack military & embassies = Jihad
Iranians protesting the regime = Sedition
Azerbaijan selling oil to Israel = Halal
Turkey facilitates the pipeline = Haram