Those of you in Southern Nigeria, you’ve been surrounded by Forign Fighters/ Machineries.
It is time we bring in the Israel 🇮🇱 and American approach.
Bible in one hand and gun in the other hand. It is time to protect yourself @realDonaldTrump@WhiteHouse@10DowningStreet@MaziN
@realDonaldTrump@BorisJohnson@MarinSanna@WhiteHouse @senatemajldr @Mike_Pence terrorism in Nigeria and in West Africa will end by Nigeria disintegration, freedom of Biafra. Pay serious attention to Nigeria and bring lasting peace to the region by disintegrating Nigeria
On this #TweetTuesday for the release of MAZI NNAMDI KANU, here’s one of the several victories that can independently justify his release. All people of goodwill should continue to urge the Government of Nigeria to do the right and #FreeNnamdiKanu without further ado.
The principle of non-refoulement under international human rights law
Under international human rights law, the principle of non-refoulement guarantees that no one should be returned to a country where they would face torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and other irreparable harm. This principle applies to all migrants at all times, irrespective of migration status.
What is the principle of non-refoulement? The principle of non-refoulement forms an essential protection
under international human rights, refugee, humanitarian and customary law. It prohibits States from transferring or removing individuals from their jurisdiction or effective control when there are substantial grounds for
believing that the person would be at risk of irreparable harm upon return, including persecution, torture, ill-treatment or other serious human rights violations. Under international human rights law the prohibition of refoulement is explicitly included in the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) and the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (ICPPED).
In regional instruments the principle is explicitly found in the Inter-American Convention on the Prevention of Torture, the American Convention on Human Rights, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. International human rights bodies, regional human rights courts, as
well as national courts have guided that this principle is an implicit guarantee flowing from the obligations to respect, protect and fulfil human rights. Human rights treaty bodies regularly receive individual petitions concerning non-refoulement, including the Committee Against Torture, the Human Rights Committee, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women and the Committee on the Rights of the Child.
What is the scope of the principle of non-refoulement? The prohibition of refoulement under international human rights law applies to any form of removal or transfer of persons, regardless of their status, where there
are substantial grounds for believing that the returnee would be at risk of irreparable harm upon return on account of torture, ill-treatment or other serious breaches of human rights obligations.
As an inherent element of the prohibition of torture and other forms of ill-treatment, the principle of non-refoulement is characterised by its absolute nature without any exception. In this respect, the scope of this principle under relevant human rights law treaties is broader than that contained in international refugee law.
The prohibition applies to all
persons, irrespective of their citizenship, nationality, statelessness, or migration status, and it applies wherever a State exercises jurisdiction or effective control, even when outside of that State’s territory.
The prohibition of refoulement has been interpreted by some courts and international human rights mechanisms to apply to a range of serious human rights violations, including torture, and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment...
https://t.co/7dz1hUZjw3
Below is a transcript of notes MAZI NNAMDI KANU had made when he held that crucial meeting with Southeast Governors in August 2017. A meeting that could’ve positively changed the course of history if Buhari had not resorted to the infamous Python Dance. Now, read on:
“I asked them for a seaport in Igbo land. They said no, but they could pay my family ₦300 million every month.
They are not after me, Nnamdi Kanu. They are after you—the ordinary Igbo people. I just happen to be standing in their way.
I also asked for an international airport and a seaport in Igbo land. They said that if those were granted, the region would develop beyond Lagos. Instead, they offered me an additional ₦5 billion to keep quiet.
I asked for equal rights and for Nigeria to treat the Igbo people fairly. They said they would ‘try their best.’ Trying your best to see my people as equal citizens of one Nigeria is laughable.
I then said, ‘Fine, let my people have a referendum so they can choose whether to stay or leave.’
The freedom of my people is the reason I was born.”
Breaking!!!
The complete leaked Audio voice note of the criminal Ikenga uruagu confession that Ejima who was caught for eliminating Biafrans is working with him and expelled criminals in DoS,..
The crimes of the treacherous carowhite Ifeanyi Ejiofor and the expelled criminals in DoS are numerous, a leaked voice note of one of the media personel of the expelled criminals in DoS by name Ikenga uruagu have surfaced,
The criminal gang member and expelled DoS media personel Ikenga uruagu confirmed in the leaked voice audio which is now going viral, that Ejima who was captured for eliminating Biafrans was a member of the expelled DoS, Ejima mentioned Chinasa Nworu the expelled DoS has his sponsor,
Recall in 2024, that the youths of Anambra accused The treacherous carowhite Ifeanyi Ejiofor that is working with the criminal Ikenga uruagu who is also Ejima's comrade and the expelled DoS of sponsoring insecurity in Anambra State,..
It's now clear that Ejima, Carowhite Ifeanyi Ejiofor, the expelled criminal DoS and the criminal Ikenga uruagu are the same gang members, they are working together, causing insecurity in Biafra land and then rush to social media to accused the genuine Biafra agitators
@MaziNnamdiKanu@simon_ekpa@ngoziora@USBDPM@USBGovernment
#Biafrafiles
#video
#Exposed👇👇👇.... Exposed!!!
On this X Tuesday, I join millions of faithfuls across the world in calling for the release of MAZI NNAMDI KANU & all that are detained on account of expressing their right to self determination. As I’ve always maintained, this matter is political, not judicial.
#FreeNnamdiKanu.