Akshay, you know very well that Amit Shah is the one giving protection to these gangsters. He is directly responsible for threatening your livelihoods, your family’s safety and your fellow actors in the industry.
The more you behave like slaves in front of him, the more he will treat you like trash. But the moment you unite as an industry and take a courageous stand, they will be taken aback.
Luckily, you have earned enough money and fame for next 5 generations. This Gunda Raj of dictator will end soon, in a few more years. The only questions is, How will you look back upon this time? What will you tell your grandchildren?
That you bowed down in the hope of an illusion of safety? Or you had the guts to show some courage? Take some inspiration from your fellow industry people like Imran Khan and Prakash Raj.
I know the whole industry is under a lot of pressure but the sooner we have our country back, the sooner you and your fellow actors can have the good old freedom and peace again :)
While Union Minister Hardeep Puri in February said he had only met Jeffrey Epstein as a part of a delegation, pictures show him in a one-on-one meeting with the convicted child s*x offender. Watch this video to find out how multiple claims made by Puri have been countered.
This level of access or JOURNALISM. The choice was always clear for many of us, jinko apne kaam me Bhagwaan dikhte hain, PM me nahi.
Navika ma’am, I hope little Nirvair grows up to be a very successful, independent, good boy one day and asks you, “Granny, why did you choose sucking up rather than doing your job? Why did you stoop so low in your sycophancy that you destroyed people’s lives just to get me my picture with the PM?
“You should have let me grow up like a normal kid and chosen journalism instead, so that I could have looked at your work with pride and told all my friends, ‘That’s my granny, who never sold her soul or compromised her profession.’”
Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka gave this undertaking to the court to get bail: "We will not make any calls for protest at Jantar Mantar till it's de-notified in accordance with law."
Before anyone denies it, the record is clear.
स्पष्टीकरण एवं खेद : ABP नेटवर्क के डिजिटल प्लेटफॉर्म पर लोक गायिका नेहा सिंह राठौर से संबंधित एक ख़बर प्रसारित की गई, जो तथ्यों के आधार पर ग़लत पाई गई. इस त्रुटिपूर्ण प्रसारण के लिए हमें खेद है, हम इसके लिए क्षमा प्रार्थी हैं.
Dear Shri Zubair, we have taken note of your point that many instances of duplicate entries can still be found in the electoral roll of UP even after SIR. We are well aware of that fact and are in midst of the work of removing the duplicate entries. A major political party has already submitted to us a list of such entries some days ago. They have claimed that the number of duplicate entries is in lakhs but we are sure that it would not be so since we have already covered much ground since end of SIR. We have also noted your other point of instances of individuals filing multiple forms-7 for deletion of other voters. This was also in our knowledge as the issue was prominently raised by parties during SIR in first half of February this year. We had done two press conferences only on this issue in the month of February itself. A news portal also brought it out again on 9th October before you posted about it. We had already clarified this issue before your post through a press release issued some days ago. You can check it out on our X handle.
1/2
@ceoup See the change of tone? From taunting as 'fact checker' to Shri Jubair... This is all because Vote chori has been caught and they now know, none of them will be spared once this monstrous regime ends
In Connaught Place, right wing goons kept surrounding the protesters all day. They kept hurling abuses. They even beat people up, but the police and paramilitary forces took no action against them.
Back in 2025, Amit Shah knew that people will come to streets once they discover Vote Chori
He had realized it after stealing the Delhi Mandate
Now police is following these SOPs to stop the protest from being a success
@abhijeet_dipke@SauravDassss will have to defeat this
We witnessed a rare moment of protest inside fortress Jantar Mantar: the economist and activist Jean Dreze and other student activists picked up moments after they began their protest.
A long post!
The Election Commission never had the bandwidth or manpower to carry out such a gigantic clean up of the electoral rolls. It instead relied on an AI-powered application called ERONET.
It uses AI to identify Photo Similar Entries (PSE) and Demographic Similar Entries (DSE) to flag potential mismatches between current voter rolls and legacy databases, like the 2002 base rolls.
The software is essentially a black box, with little to no publicly available information about the AI models actually used in deployment. We do not know the model specs, similarity threshold used, its performance metrics, evaluation benchmarks, false positive rates, how it was trained or evaluated for Indian languages, whether it was developed indigenously or based on a known model/provider. We simply do not know enough.
Anyone with even a basic understanding of AI will tell you that these systems are prone to hallucination errors, and out of distribution (OOD) problems. Even the best large language models, vision models, state-of-the-art OCR technology in the market still struggle to peform with perfect accuracy, particularly on non-Latin scripts.
The 2002 electoral rolls were in native languages and scripts across different states, such as Kannada, Telugu and Bengali. Many AI systems continue to have substantially weaker performance on low-resource languages and scripts compared with English. For ex, a model trained on English will generalize poorly to a low resource language like Telegu or Odia. The old electoral rolls were not originally structured digital databases. They had to be digitised and processed, including through automated conversion into English in some workflows, before they could be compared against contemporary electoral data.
Effectively, it creates multiple points where errors can enter the pipeline through scanning, OCR, transliteration, and finally the AI based matching itself.
That means some level of rigorous human oversight is essential to keep such a system robust and control false positives. We do not know whether adequate human oversight was actually in place, or whether the entire workflow, from OCR and data extraction to AI based matching and automated notice generation, was effectively handed over to the system. The ECI needs to be completely transparent about how this entire workflow was carried out and make the relevant technical documentation, evaluation results, and human-verification procedures publicly available.
There is also a major question around the system's access control and privilege architecture. We do not publicly know the role-based access control (RBAC) structure of ERONET, who has read/write access to the underlying electoral databases, whether EROs or other field level officials can directly modify records, what privileges are available at each administrative level. The Indian Express report seems to indicate that EROs, who have the statutory authority to add/ delete voters, were denied this privilege through the software.
We also need to know whether there is a complete, immutable audit trail recording who accessed, modified, approved or deleted a record, when the action was performed, and what changes were made. Without this information, it is difficult to independently establish the chain of custody and accountability for changes made to electoral roll data.