Parenting practices seem to have little or no impact on children's personalities, contrary to some of the best-known theories in psychology. (Longitudinal study; N = 3,880) https://t.co/c1r63lWjiC
I am beyond excited to share a new preprint from my lab ‘The Conceptual Structure of Human Relationships across Modern and Historical Cultures’. We discovered a universal representational space of social relationship concepts. https://t.co/jx3xesH7tC
I am not sure of the official DAY OF PUBLICATION but my taste ensembles are in JEP:G!
https://t.co/mDv8t1TfLF
please read if you have ever found yourself wondering "on average, how sweet are these briefly presented food pictures?"
w/ jon cant and @KeisukeFukuda4
Bispectral Neural Networks go to #ICLR2023!
In this work, we present a new neural network architecture capable of learning unknown groups purely from the symmetries implicit in data
—with @cashewmake2, Bruno Olshausen, and Christopher Hillar
1/17
In the latest paper from my lab, @jerryptang showed that we can decode language that a person is hearing (or even just thinking) from fMRI responses. https://t.co/GUCDtiaXlR
Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?
Presents an alternative explanation for emergent abilities: one can choose a metric which leads to the inference of an emergent ability or another metric which does not.
https://t.co/CZzh2th2xo
It was amazing to see the massive support this week for this big change - thank you.
And huge thank you to the 870 people who already signed up to review for Imaging Neuroscience!
Can we make it a thousand? :-)
@tyrell_turing@LecoqJerome@PessoaBrain By analogy, our current definitions of "sentience" seem based on the verbal/correlated outputs of the system that generates it (e.g., double-dipping), so it fails when generalizing from humans to LMMs (e.g., cross-validation)
Major physical advances from the last century — general relativity, the Standard Model and the hunt for the Higgs boson — all have symmetry to thank. New symmetries promise new breakthroughs. https://t.co/O7u2XK20W0
Constellations of chemicals interact to form the fragrances familiar to us. To truly understand smell, scientists need to map the relationships among these molecules. Machine learning can help. https://t.co/BJ9335PtAk
@MarcCoutanche@StriemAmit There's an older paper finding consistency for taste (0.84/1 "bits"): https://t.co/tGrtS0GWXm
But this is based on word-taste confusions. Agree someone should look at the correlations among individual similarity matrices without labels to decouple word from sense consistency
@MarcCoutanche@StriemAmit I think it's a really interesting question why there are much lower correspondences for taste in GPT-3 shown in this work (r = 0.2). By contrast, in our shape work humans tend to be correlated to each other at r = ~0.9
@MarcCoutanche@StriemAmit What is especially interesting about this work, is that there are *differences* among the psychophysical dimensions. These dimensions have also been presumably trained from scientific literature (e.g., taste/consonants/timbre)
All NeuroImage and NeuroImage:Reports editors have resigned over the high publication fee, and are starting a new non-profit journal
https://t.co/DmnwDKVCK7
This comes with great regret, and a huge amount of thought and discussion- please read announcement to get more details.
Updated the preprint below! We have included the THINGS data (similarity of 1854 natural objects) and successfully aligned the mental representations of 1854 objects across individuals in an unsupervised manner using Gromov-Wasserstein optimal transport.
https://t.co/EqeKlLzJjR