I liked this piece. "Specifically, society is the user experience (UX) of other technologies; it determines how individual humans experience the power that technology yields." hence a dire need for tech education to deeply embed philosophy, ethics and sociology in curricula. >
The enemy of techno-optimism isn’t sustainability; it’s short-termism.
Humanity should not build new things to pump up quarterly earnings; we should build them so that our descendants, in whatever form they come, will own the worlds and the stars.
https://t.co/08PLizJ093
@luileito Like a full professor? We wish... Don't get me started 😄 anyway even this is wrong. People should be able to research strategically even during their PhD. We waste our most energetic years chasing pub counts to get tenure. This shouldn't be happening...
the best we can as part of our role in society. We're building for the next conference or journal issue, not for the next generation to reach the stars. Who can afford to work strategically these days, to build platforms or theories for future generations?
And also: "The enemy of techno-optimism isn’t sustainability; it’s short-termism. Humanity should not build new things to pump up quarterly earnings." Replace the latter with "yearly publication counts" and presto: academia's biggest problem and, imho, why we are not doing >
@ACMUIST Wow so this is actually now an official publication!! It has been on arxiv for so long and already has > 150 citations on scholar... Is this the future of publishing?
Everyone is concerned about how, left to themselves, students will use GPT to do all their homework for them. What happens when you DO give students unfettered access? See our paper! The blog post even gives you a little quiz so you can check your beliefs.
https://t.co/fJIjkQgG5D
What does immersive and ubiquitous analytics have in common with Dungeons & Dragons, Game of Thrones, and Avatar: The Last Airbender? Why, magic✨🔮🧙♂️ of course! At the upcoming #ieeevis 2023 conference, @DreaBatch, @pwsbutcher, @ritsos_p, and I will show how! Thread 🧵1/n
some community-defined challenge, who coached and mentored the next generation of researchers. I'd like to see awards and recognitions for good citizenship, not individual achievement. Ubuntu: I am, because we are.
On the same topic: we need a culture shift. This year at @ACMMobileHCI, *only* 20/107 archived publications were international collaborative efforts. Why? In the town hall, I asked, can we do better as a community? Why do we care just about awards for most citations, or best >
Utrecht University @UniUtrecht in the Netherlands has withdrawn itself from the World University ranking @THEworldunirank provided by @timeshighered. As this has generated quite some reactions - praise, questions, some doubts, I want to provide some context. Hence a thread 🧵1/16
It was a small step, that I hope others will follow, so in the future we may rejoice less in the competition of whose paper was technically better, and more in the example of those who shared more data and code, who made more global collaborations, who worked together to solve >
1000 times *YES*. This is the way forward. Focus on cooperation and open science, not competition. I don't know any uni with a charter to be No1 in some metric, and chasing some incomplete index is to divert from the true mission. May the rest of the world follow.
Utrecht University @UniUtrecht in the Netherlands has withdrawn itself from the World University ranking @THEworldunirank provided by @timeshighered. As this has generated quite some reactions - praise, questions, some doubts, I want to provide some context. Hence a thread 🧵1/16
Check out Sept 2023 Issue of PACMHCI which collects 42 high-quality articles on the theme of #MobileHCI, in particular the ethical imperatives of #ubiquitouscomputing. Edited by @luileito, Maristella Matera, @johannesschoeni. #computing#computingethics https://t.co/DEjt58eWyM
@plopesresearch Aaaand for that reason, it looks as if short papers typically end up getting the short stick in the selection process 😄 it would be good for @sigchi to consider open reviewing processes where (some?) papers are in DL along with their reviews. This can help towards training.
@YueJiang_nj@jeffbigham@drmaxlwilson Rule of thumb: one study (experiment) is enough for a short paper, but it must be solid (enough n, proper stats, good discussion) and must offer some definite and clear contribution. Of course that's for empirical work only. Unlikely to get theory shorts anyway!
@EvropiStefanidi @UweGruenefeld Thank you both, and to all the SVs 🫶 best team ever!!!! So very proud of what you achieved, and most of all the way you achieved it.