@robbysoave Why is it always the Republicans voters fault? Everyone knows that Republican voters have no agency and that, if goaded, they have no choice but to nominate an unhinged nutjob under multiple indictments.
@skramey@TheRickWilson Obviously Republican's enjoy it, because they are insisting that twitter post Hunter Biden's titanic member at every possible opportunity, and for them to no t allow this is a violation of our rights!
@DucksSoCal2016 @StrattonH @Timodc How so? There is no evidence of this other than vague references to emails and that wasn't what the Biden campaign complained about. The complaint was twitter user posting his son's massive dong.
@skramey@TheRickWilson I'm not the one who demands Hunter Biden's cock be plastered all over twitter in defense of free speech. That's you. I am simply giving you what you want: Hunter Biden's throbbing, engorged cock.
@grenwuld That's not what a strawman is my dude. But if you don't believe me read the TOS. Pornographic pictures, and especially pornographic pictures posted non consensually are against the TOS and will be removed upon request.
@grenwuld @StrattonH @Timodc Yes, they did. If a laptop full of pictures of Ivanka Trump materialized showing her giving graphic blowjobs to members of Congress they would sure as shit have been removed from this platform as fast as people tried to put them up.
@grenwuld @StrattonH @Timodc The highlighted seciton was sarcasm. Twitter removes pornnographic content, especially non consensual pornographic content all the time. (Or they did).
@grenwuld @StrattonH @Timodc I know, they never remove adult content from twitter, so as you requested all we will talk about is Hunter Biden's colossal member. For free speech. What is your favorite thing about Hunter Biden's dick? For me it's the girth.
@StrattonH @damintoell The clownery is completely obvious, this is the discourse you wanted and it is what you will be getting: Hunter Bidens big dick shoved in your face forever. https://t.co/7XG0QmPVAY
@StrattonH @damintoell This is what you guys wanted. The "free speech argument is laughable and easy to debunk by the giant rise (pun intended) we get out of you when we point out the subject of the newspaper article you all are so angrily defending as a beacon of free speech. Lulz.