@CMonteiro_USP But what type of studies showed these associations? How variables were adjusted?
What do you mean by robust? What are in essence ultraprocessed foods? How authors classify them? I bet there is no consensus on the study this is a serious publication bias of YOUR inference.
During the initial submission, the paper had 4 authors: Mariya Vincent, Vinoth B. Kumaravelu, Murugadass Arthi and Pachiyappan Arulmozhivarman. During the revision, Arulmozhivarman (dean of academic research @VIT_univ) removed the first 2 authors’ names without their permission.
pesquisador se diz renomado com publicação na JAMA mas nenhuma publicação de liderança mostrando a safadeza para chegar ao título de professor titular numa universidade chilena, e nunca orientou alunos sempre pequeno “carona” nos projetos dos outros. Academia consegue ser tóxica.
New pub alert 🚨 on sharing meals with parents and adolescents dietary patterns from the National (Brazilian) School Health Survey - 2019.
Conception and methodology done by my 1st Master Student in Nutrition and Dietetics. Proud 🥹 supervisor 🌟 https://t.co/3dFXm38WFz
I’m horrified to see the level of some Master supervisors:
supervisor - no need to add hypotheses on your study as you are only describing and you’re not doing analytics. Hypothesis is only for analytics studies
I was shocked when I heard that but then I saw her HIndex was of 4
This article by @maoviedogarcia had a fairly rough ride to being finally published. We talked about this here: https://t.co/4Nf0Pr7qfe.
In this post, we focus on the article itself. In essence the article asks whether @MDPIOpenAccess is a predatory publisher. It does not ask that question directly, and does not provide a definitive answer. This, we suspect, is by design as it could be open to question.
What the article does do is provide an evidence base that readers can use to make their minds. In our view, this is a good way to do it. You can't argue with the evidence. You can, of course, and are entitled to, argue with what the evidence means - and this is what academic debate should be about, as long as it is courteous.
The paper is #OpenAccess, so there is no reason why you should not take a look. The images show the front and some of the tables but we encourage that you take a look at the full paper.
Citation: M Ángeles Oviedo-García (2021) Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). Research Evaluation 30(3):405–419a. https://t.co/BVbQ2LIxDI
President Biden is right, there is no place in America for this kind of violence. As a country we may not agree on everything, but we should be able to agree on that.
New pub alert and ready to be shared ‼️ On diet quality and mental health among Brazilians using the national health Survey >=80,000 individuals >=15yo. @INTUE_#Rlovers#epidemiologylovers#publichealth
🔗 https://t.co/rVrwAVN9Au
be ware with people who wants to collaborate with you and are very nice with they want to use you and to move forward in their lives #research can be toxic #ethics
If Article is in proof why co-authors published them in their social media without telling you. there is mistakes in authors credentials and name. Learning and leaving we should be very careful with whom we will collaborate with. in my case co author did not make a s***