We’re back, baby! 🔥
More motivated than ever and calling out predatory journals louder.
Follow the fight here too ⬇️🦋
https://t.co/jOYxcHPZkb
#AcademicPublishing#PredatoryJournals
Artificial-intelligence systems can generate hypotheses, design experiments and analyse data — but humans still need to decide what makes sense
https://t.co/Ay4hLGj2MG
#papermill#fraud at its best! All (!!) the authors of this paper were added during the revision process, replacing the 6 original authors! Unbelievable. @ElsevierConnect is rotten to the core! Thousands of such papers are being published.👇
https://t.co/Lg9HcGi399
🚨 Researchers are pushing back against AI-generated “hallucinated” citations in scientific papers and platforms like @arxiv are starting to crack down. ☢️
https://t.co/lvj3dXvuop
I find this kind of profiles deeply intriguing 🤔
🔹1427 verified peer reviews @webofscience
🔹Sudden increase in reviewer's citations
🔹1.79 average verified peer reviews per day in 2025
🔹2024-2026➡️99.43% out of 1427 peer reviews
🚨 Researchers are pushing back against AI-generated “hallucinated” citations in scientific papers and platforms like @arxiv are starting to crack down. ☢️
https://t.co/lvj3dXvuop
The Journal Sleuth
All about equipping yourself about the basic skills of identifying fake journals... In under an hour!
For everyone in academia!
Link to the full playlist: https://t.co/yrQEmVcMN0
#research@ARanganathan72@ScienceMagazine@ScienceNews
¿Hay alternativa a la locura de precios de las APCs de la ruta de "oro" del acceso abierto?📖
En @Revista_REDOC, analizamos las revistas de filosofía en España: un ecosistema que supone una alternativa real a las APCs. 👇
https://t.co/NuFQS8a1KX
#CienciaAbierta#OpenAccess#RRI
⚠️🚨 Science of the Total Environment has been removed from Web of Science in Nov. 2025 after retractions due to review-fraud and quality failures. Its publisher @ElsevierConnect raked in massive profits while “mega-publishing” suspect papers. 🤑🤡
https://t.co/hZmKNfmp3G
⚠️🚨 Science of the Total Environment has been removed from Web of Science in Nov. 2025 after retractions due to review-fraud and quality failures. Its publisher @ElsevierConnect raked in massive profits while “mega-publishing” suspect papers. 🤑🤡
https://t.co/hZmKNfmp3G
🧪 After 25 years, a landmark study claiming the herbicide Glyphosate/Roundup was “safe” has been officially retracted, due to ghost-writing and clear conflicts of interest. What was once scientific “proof” now collapses. #Science#Glyphosate#Retracted ☣️
https://t.co/hqYOuk2APm
🧪 After 25 years, a landmark study claiming the herbicide Glyphosate/Roundup was “safe” has been officially retracted, due to ghost-writing and clear conflicts of interest. What was once scientific “proof” now collapses. #Science#Glyphosate#Retracted ☣️
https://t.co/hqYOuk2APm
This AI generated piece of crap published only roughly 3 weeks ago has already been retracted! As long as enough media pays attention to it, retractions can go fast.... Go figure! A lot still to be retracted by @SpringerNature , for sure in @SciReports 👇
https://t.co/10vC6h7W7u