History has taught us for 3,000 years:
๐ซ Do not use warhorses for donkey tasks.
๐ซ Do not bring the wrong blade to the real fight.
The unit economics of TOKENMAXXING work exactly the same way.
In SaaS, the 100th seat was free. In AI, the 100th inference costs the same as the first.
Through experience, we are educated to choose the right model for the right usecase, but the lesson learnt is ...
โผ๏ธ NOT all token outcomes have the same VALUE.
โผ๏ธ NOT all VALUE has the same IMPACT. Period
Consider the reality of "Tokenmaxxed" workflows: Burning 10 million tokens in Claude Opus to draft a basic PowerPoint isn't leveraging AI. It is firing up a $500K Lamborghiniย ๐๏ธ to drive 200 meters for coffee โ.
But, burning 10 million tokens on a strategic deck that drives a 10x revenue multiplier? That is pure value creation.
What matters is: WHICH MODEL ->ย for WHICH OUTCOMEย ->ย at WHICH COST.
For the CXO, AI inference cannot be allowed to drive margin compression. Tokens are the new multiplier for ARR and NRR. The two driving factors are : Pricing and Capital Allocation.
1๏ธโฃ Pricing: SaaS vendors must embrace hybrid pricing (Platform + Seat + Outcome-based). Itโs not just outcome-first; itโs value-first.
2๏ธโฃ Capital Allocation: Embed an intake process tied directly to token economics. Every enterprise AI initiative must pass through a VALUE RUBRIC, a filtering rule where any workflow with under $50K in projected impact gets routed to a lightweight model (like Haiku or Flash), reserving heavy frontier models strictly for high-yield outcomes. Treat compute like capital: institute quarterly token reallocations.
Remember:
โผ๏ธ NOT all OUTCOMES yield the same VALUE, and
โผ๏ธ NOT all VALUE delivers the same IMPACT.
To keep it simple: Not every PowerPoint inference needs Claude Opus. More to come on Compute
#AI #EnterpriseAI #FinOps #AIeconomics #GenerativeAI
Jensen has upgraded the recipe from baking Layer cakes to brewing AI factories. In AI factories, TOKENS are the currency of exchange and cost to produce tokens is called "๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ผ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ."
Hereโs what everyone got wrong, including me.
When the cost to produce dropped from $๐ญ๐ต.๐ต๐ต ๐๐ผ $๐ฌ.๐ต๐ต ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐บ๐ถ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ง๐ข๐๐๐ก we assumed it is a Royal Flush moment for VC who invested early in AI
But the assumption is WRONG.
1. ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ (๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐) โฃ๏ธ -ย Best mover advantage and you get to architectย at the unit economics onย todays rate ($0.99)
2. ๐ฌ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐๐ถ๐ป (๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐)ย โฅ๏ธ-ย started startups 2 years ago,ย ย built on yesterdays price at $19.99 got doomed onย both cost structure and valuationย ย Thatโs not just a pricing strategy shift, a call to move from selling AI to selling workflow.
3. ๐ฌ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฝ๐ฎ (๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ๐) โฆ๏ธ -ย Doesn't care. He owns the casino, the power grid,ย the customer, the data, and the distribution.
"๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ช๐ถ๐ป๐."ย But thereโs one catch: The House only wins if the casino stays full. If tokens get too cheap too fast, Grandpa's holding a massive mortgage on empty data centers
At the end of the day, ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐ณ (๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ) Aโ ๏ธ โ doesnโt know what a token costs, doesnโt care. Heโs buying outcomes.ย ๐๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐ป๐, but that doesn't mean all AI companies will survive. It's not about the cards โ it's about the bet.
Appreciate if we have reality check from experts Ethan Mollick and Tomasz Tunguz
As intelligence becomes a commodity, are ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฝ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ณ๐น๐ผ๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป, ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ ๐/๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ, ๐๐ฟ๐๐๐, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ ๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ the key defensible moats left for startups โ or is something even bigger at play on the casino floor?
Most people think better AI means paying less. The truth is different.
A $500 TV today is much better than a $500 TV from 5 years ago.
AI run backwards.ย
โขย When the model becomes much stronger (the newest top models), the price stays high or even goes up.
โขย Companies keep those margins to build the next better models
Right now the best model sets the best price.ย From model perspective, the real unlock for AI adoption isn't better models. It's open-source and real competition.
#AIReflection,#TOKENOMICS,#AIEconomics,#AIAdoption, #AILeadership
๐ฆ ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐ค๐ฌ, ๐ณ ๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ & ๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ฉ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ฌ: ๐๐ก๐จ ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฉ๐๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ฐ๐ฅ?
4 quarter game-4 hours streaming around $800M in ad revenue- roughly $8 million per 30 seconds. From an executive leader perspective, capital allocation on ads is super critical as 120 million people are watching livestream. This year, AI was on the field and the scoreboard is not just for Seahawks vs Patriots; it is for AI Advertisersย vs AI Diffusers.
There are two categories of Ads:
1. ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ซ๐ฌ โ AI Companies competes for consumer subscription.
2. ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐๐ซ๐ฌ โ Big Brands diffuse AI for higher margins.
What I have read and noticed: brands that went all-in on AI, improved production speed by 50% and saved millions in VFX costs โ but created AI fatigue, andย customers struggled to identify what brand is beyond the AI commercial.
From a unit economics perspective, ROAI (Return on AI Investment) looked great, but other key enterprise metrics such as CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) and Customer LTV (Lifetime Value) told a different story.
My take: The winner is not the one that has the best advertisement, but the one who can sail through the Sharks,ย Whales,ย and Dolphins
(A) Sharks โ The Big Brands fighting for the same customer attention.
(B) Whales โ The Capitals, the big platforms or the media buyers.
(C) Dolphins โ Itโs me, the customer, loyal to the brand.
The equation is A + B + C.ย My reflection:ย Google (Gemini helping visualize family dreams), Budweiser ("American Icons"), and MrBeast & Salesforce ($1 million puzzle) genuinely differentiated themselves. They sailed through successfully and achieved measurable outcomes.
They didnโt just use AI as a tool. Theyย established personal connections, kept experiences and placed humans at the center of the design.
If I counter-argue: What if two brands compete on the same thesis โ can they still sail through? Yes, they can. But the winning strategy is yourย proprietary customer data, and how you mesh it with post-game conversion funnels and your genuine brand purpose.
Which Super Bowl ads do you think have captured the equation (A + B + C)?
Not able to understand Machine Learning and Deep Neural Networks well?๐ค
Here are 6 brilliant visualizations of the ML & Neural Network models, including 3D viz. of LLM ๐๐งต
โThe CIO has changed materiallyโฆCIOs are not just managing a portfolio of applicationsโฆthey are also building competency in software engineering, in areas like cybersecurity,โ Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian says https://t.co/qJKew9DCiv
"Youโre going to die one day, and none of this is going to matter. So enjoy yourself. Do something positive. Project some love. Make someone happy. Laugh a little bit. Appreciate the moment. And do your work."
@naval
If you enjoyed this thread, retweet it so other people can benefit!
Follow @AliTheCFO
I tweet about:
โข Finance
โข Business Frameworks
โข Personal Growth
After watching the @Amazon Alexa Super Bowl ad, if you wished that Alexa was enabled for your enterprise? KloudGin Intelligent ERP Cloud is integrated with Amazon Lex, and did I mention that @KloudGin has not lost its voice :)
https://t.co/IC1JZuSKB7 https://t.co/YZgyVH0suX