Anat Faigon

[facts about @destinationXIX]

Bookmark this. Because when New York burns under Mamdani’s “revolution,” the blame will not fall where it belongs. It will fall - once again- on the Jews.

That’s how it always happens.
When policies built on resentment collapse, when crime rises, when capital flees, the people who warned about it will be blamed for “opening the gate.” It happened in Europe with mass migration and Islamist radicalization, and the same dynamic is unfolding here.

Polls already show that nearly 30 % of Mamdani’s supporters cite his hostility to Israel as a reason for voting for him - not housing, not jobs, not governance. In other words, hatred of Jews has been mainstreamed into local politics as a socially acceptable political identity. That’s not “justice” - it’s old-fashioned antisemitism with a graduate-school vocabulary.

And when his ideology fails - as it inevitably will - it won’t be his activists, donors, or media allies who take responsibility. It will be the Jewish community accused of “supporting Mamdani”, “provoking backlash,” of “dividing the city,” of “weaponizing antisemitism.” The same people who were targeted will be blamed for the targeting.

So keep this post for later.
When the city begins to pay the price for elevating demagogues who define morality by their hatred of Israel, remember this moment -
and remember who warned against turning antisemitism into a political fashion statement, and who voted for an antisemite, Jihadi communist.

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@jhepplegate @JulianAndreone @JewishSpaceLazr No, they don't - listen to the original Hebrew.

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@uavictory22 @luketress What BS. The dog he's talking about is a part of the Sting unit that trains dogs to detect explosives and booby traps in tunnels and buildings on the battlefield.

There are no dogs in Israeli prisons.

This nonsense is a part of the Pallywood project, and Kristof fell for it.

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@AshOnega @TeriBarbaro @HagarChemali Not true. Israelis pay for (national) health care insurance through payroll/income taxes.

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@terrorbiteagain @shamij @LizzySavetsky @nycjewishtours He never said any of that. This is a bogus, fabricated quote going around in antisemitic online circles, but does not appear in any of his speeches or writings.

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@Kaysdoryyahooc3 @TheModerateCase Nope, for the most part, they've been "kindly" slaughtering jews, Christians, Kurds, Druze, other minorities, rival muslim sects, their neighbors, wives, sisters, and daughters since the 7th century.

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@Amiran_Zizovi HOPE!

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@MOSSADil Yes

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@its_The_Dr One of the mechanisms that can explain gender dysphoria is the merging of two eggs/embryos of different sexes in early pregnancy, a.k.a. embryo fusion.

The rising prevalence of older mothers and fertility/hormonal treatments makes such multi-embryo pregnancies a lot more common.

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@CFC_Gio @ShadowofEzra No, Christians in Israel are full citizens with all the same rights just as everyone else under Israeli law.

[Liza Rosen @LizaRosen0000]

https://t.co/I5i4qgqpV5
British police just stand there—frozen, useless—as Muslims and their loyal idiot-infidels chant for mass murder of white British Christians and Jews. They’re literally calling for suicide bombings, like the one that slaughtered kids at the Manchester.

This is exactly what intifada means, a wave of terror attacks against the infidels as part of jihad (holy war).

[Tali Goldsheft @TaliGoldsheft]

The current level of vitriol and violence-supporting rhetoric in America is beyond alarming.

There’s no reason for the Democratic Party to stand behind a candidate who will not condemn hate speech. If Mamdani doesn’t stand for the values of this party, he shouldn’t be endorsed by a single Democrat.

Reminder: When Tamika Mallory refused to condemn Farrakhan’s hate speech, the DNC stopped sponsoring the Women’s March.

[Vivid.🇮🇱 @VividProwess]

They came for our women.
They came for our children.
They came for our homeland.

Now we are coming for them.

[ד״ר עינת וילף Dr. Einat Wilf @EinatWilf]

The UN General Assembly’s decision on two states with a “right of return” is, in effect, a decision for two Arab states. For anyone who mistakenly thought this was a vision of peace, a true achievement, or Arab and global unity around a positive vision—well, it isn’t. There is nothing here to celebrate.

Even if the resolution includes words about Palestine without Hamas and condemnation of the massacre, in the end it preserves the very idea in whose name the massacre was carried out—the idea of “return.” Moreover, in Article 39, it even “reiterates,” almost casually, the so-called “right of return” (even though no such right exists, and Resolution 194 does not speak of such a right). By doing so, it essentially cancels out all the preceding clauses and all the nice wording that came before it.

The reason Adi Schwartz and I have devoted years to studying the “return” ethos in the construction of Palestinian identity—which reflects their ongoing commitment to the negation of Zionism (in our books The War of Return and its update October Return)—is because it is the clearest and most reliable test to determine whether the Arabs of Gaza, the West Bank, and the millions in Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon truly intend to end the century-long war against Zionism and live alongside a Jewish state, rather than on its ruins.

Palestinian leaders can say, and indeed do say, “two states,” and we, ever naïve, assume that one of those two is meant to be the Jewish state. But if you press further and ask them about their stance on the “right of return,” their answer is always, without exception, that the “right of return” is “sacred, non-negotiable, and belongs personally to every Palestinian across generations.” The implication is that, given the millions who claim to hold this “right,” the only “two states” being discussed are: an Arab state in Gaza and the West Bank without Jews, and another Arab state with a Jewish minority (unlikely to last long…).

Unfortunately, the Arab-Palestinian position on the “right of return” is not a “symbolic” issue or a matter for negotiation—that is the Western interpretation (westplaining). In the 1990s one could still believe it was a bargaining position that would be moderated in exchange for a state, compensation, or a “symbolic return.” But after the issue has been tested multiple times in negotiations and unilateral withdrawals, and as it becomes clear that time and again the Palestinians prefer to forgo an actual state in hand in favor of “return” in theory, then sadly, one must take them at their word and acknowledge the consistency with which they act to realize that goal.

Finally, those who truly want peace (those who want endless war—well, in that, the Palestinians are reliable partners) must act with a sober understanding of the other side. We must not project our wishes onto them, but recognize that the conflict always was and remains—especially in the land between the river and the sea—exactly as the British Foreign Secretary observed in February 1947: between Jews who want a state and Arabs who want the Jews not to have one. Therefore, to genuinely reach peace, we must understand that the conflict will only end on the day the Palestinians adopt a vision of living alongside the Jewish state, not instead of it. That is what must be pursued, however long it takes.

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@Oswald_A_Lisker @MaryRoss815 @DavidJHarrisJr Schwab is German, and a practicing Roman Catholic.

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@hippyygoat @RealCandaceO @TuckerCarlson Candace went full blown Israel Derangement Syndrome. What a disappointment.

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@Dante012d2 @jk_rowling It did. Her saliva (=skin) DNA test showed a different DNA from her blood test. As I mentioned, her children inherited her *male* DNA, which was actually her absorbed brother's DNA.

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@jk_rowling His professor said he won't be able to publish this because the left-leaning crowd insists that gender is a social construct, while the right-leaning crowd sticks to the biblical 'male and female created he them' (Genesis 1:27).

[Anat Faigon @Anatfaigon]

@jk_rowling Interestingly, her children inherited her male DNA, which her doctors said came from her twin brother's fetus that was absorbed into her body in utero.

I know of a Phd student who wanted to study this phenomenon but was persuaded to drop it.