@DanHMcInerney@DanielMiessler@mattpocockuk This does look interesting, having myself some experience with @mattpocockuk's skills and Claude's superpowers. But I wonder how this could work without a similar amount of going into detail about stuff. Will check them out.
@ArtoriasV@Pirat_Nation@der8auer showed uneven and out of spec power draw in a couple pins even with the cable properly seated, and he tried multiple times. https://t.co/DMPXRj0RH1
@Voultar No current screen kit accurately represents GBC colors the way they should be, so even if you do shell out for the best mod kit out there, you still wouldn't match the Chromatic
@phreeze83@Ryuuko_Ranbu@Marcelo43506680@TakiUdon_ is determined by the customs agents, not the invoice and import documents. They happily ignore what's there and look up the price themselves. The total compound import tax in Brazil is often around 60~100%. And often Estate tax taxes the Federal tax too (yes, tax over tax) 2/2
@phreeze83@Ryuuko_Ranbu@Marcelo43506680@TakiUdon_ You should know better than most that taxes in Brazil do not always apply (it heavily depends on how it was imported and the tax lottery), and even though a product might be classified as a computer part or something, the actual classification and price for both import taxes 1/2
@MastermindYTDed @Pinko69420 Because there are many accounts of what he said, and he also said other stuff you could very well use to support many shitty points of view, as people often do.
The cultural view of Jesus being all hippie and loving is unfortunately not fully supported by the biblical texts.
@RyanEls4 You'd be surprised at how hard it actually is to tell whether something is a number in JavaScript, let alone that something is an integer, let alone that it's an odd integer.
@immanencer@martinmbauer As amazing as LLMs can be, I find the usage of such wording to be intentionally misleading. Nothing an LLM does can be called "reasoning", for example. The details in the "finer" print don't nullify the choice of words for the majority of the text.
@immanencer@martinmbauer A small footnote does not nullify their marketing:
"We’re announcing GPT-4o, our new flagship model that can reason across audio, vision, and text in real time."
"Reason" and whatnot. Yes, the page goes on to describe in more detail its limitations, but clearly not their focus.
@immanencer@martinmbauer "is there a prime number n that is the nth prime?"
That's a question. It answers it to you, and sure, if you add "think in steps" it does a better (?) job at demonstrating it's just showing you a path towards a solution, but otherwise it pretends to actually know.
@immanencer@martinmbauer If they're just writing assistants, they shouldn't answer questions. They should be coded accordingly. But that's clearly not what their marketing wants to communicate.
And requiring the prompt "think in steps" is weird. Bad training data, perhaps?
2/2
@immanencer@martinmbauer Well, they're clearly neither marketed as such, nor do they display any signs, inside the product, of being just that. You asked a question and it hallucinated an answer, so people expect to use that precisely to get answers to questions. 1/2