Craftyartist

I am a artist who just wants to be left alone,now forced to be, a light in the darkness.I hope to let others step out in the light so we all have future.

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

@kevinhollinrake Who are you trying to fool?

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

@FarRightSkip Lol accurate,we live in clown world in UK.I hate it here

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

@GuidoFawkes He lit a match now wants to just add more fuel for our anger,I say good luck parasites, tyrants need to go

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

@NewstalkFM Another reason they want to censor the internet, they can't censor real life and we will have all these corrupt fools removed from parliament

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

@HarmonicBloom @Heccles94 You live in a glass house then,all your privacy is on display?

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

@Pirat_Nation If we don't own then we should sail the high seas,we shouldn't give a penny to companies who don't give a shit about us.We are not your cash pigs,we want to own the thing we payed for.This scummy wef attitude needs to go,we will own our stuff and we will be happy.

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

Blue sky being exempt should tell you all need to know about the type of people pushing this nonsense.

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

We will remove the parasites from power no matter what they do,They are showing how tyrannical they are we have a duty to remove tyrants

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

@SwiftTrader0 @TerichoHorror @grok It was rigged there was no where that said no,or I have concerns about security.They also we're going to do it regardless because they are tyrants,they follow the wef plan like all the other countries implementing it

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

@leicesterliz Parents always had the power in there hands you just have taken it away from them and made all of at risk.We do not want to hand our information over just to use the internet.If you make it so we can't access our devices without id then you can foot the bill

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

Vpn ban incoming,want powers to shut the internet off at times of crisis,sounds like we are under a Chinese or islamic regime

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

Look closely at what the government is promising you here (published 15th June). They claim that if your account is over 16 years old, you are safe from the dragnet. But then comes the casual, insidious trap: if you do have to prove your age, they say it will be 'as simple as a facial recognition check.'

Do not let that soft language fool you. 'As simple as a face scan' means surrendering the unchangeable, mathematical architecture of your human identity.

Here is the brutal reality: this is a biometric harvesting operation masquerading as child safety. Your biometrics - your face, your irises, your unique biological signature - are the most sensitive pieces of data you possess. If a password leaks, you reset it. If your biometric blueprint is hacked, leaked, or scraped into a government database, your identity is compromised for life. They are normalising the idea that you must scan your body just to access the public square. It is the ultimate blueprint for a permanent digital cage.

Once your biological data is stored in their centralised databases (which it will be) your privacy is dead forever. You aren't just logging into an app - you are voluntarily handing over the keys to a corporate and state surveillance engine.

An app-level 'under 16s ban' is universally recognised by security experts as unpoliciable and structurally broken.

Following the mass backlash from tech companies, the UK government reconsidered its stance... But this is what they're not telling you - something we have warned you about for years.

The UK Gov already appointed an expert panel to 'fast-track' a national, official Digital ID scheme earlier this year, that will (despite their current lies) eventually serve as the master credential to 'solve the problem' with an unenforceable 'under 16s social media ban.'

It has NEVER been about Children's safety. Ever. So, to coerce compliance of all UK adults, we will soon see the beginning of another textbook manufactured crisis.

Do not be fooled by the ongoing political theatre. The predictable failure of this ban is completely by design. As the system intentionally glitches, the media will flood the headlines with weaponised fear - amplifying stories of online horror and grooming to rile up panicked parents.

Once again, they are engineering a crisis of fear so severe that the public will ultimately beg for the exact Digital ID grid they would have otherwise rejected.

Cast your mind back to September 2025: 'mass illegal migration' didn't work as an excuse for Digital ID, did it? So the Epstein Class now use Children's safety as the excuse.

By wrapping the digital credential inside the emotionally charged issue of child safety, dissent is effectively silenced. Anyone arguing against the tracking framework is politically painted as being against child protection.

https://t.co/0I7TNOXtJq

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

@GBPolitcs They can get stuffed the tyrants

[WasAcop @WasAcop]

🚨 Who would have thought the “consultation” was a fraud from the start.

Government ministers keep citing their consultation as proof that 96% of parents back banning social media for under-16s.

Here are the actual figures from the parent responses to the key question:

• 96% agreed to some extent
• 88% strongly agreed
• Only 4% disagreed
• “Don’t know” = basically 0% (just 3 responses out of 8,444)

This wasn’t a proper poll of UK parents.

It was a self-selecting group — mostly people already worried enough about social media to respond during a heavily publicised consultation.

The main question was worded directly (“should have a minimum age of at least 16 and should not be accessible to any children under that age”), which encouraged agreement from concerned parents.

Consultations like this are often designed to gather supportive voices for policies the government already wants to push — then presented as overwhelming public demand.

Not quite the neutral evidence they’re claiming.

#ConsultationBias #SelfSelection #SocialMediaBan #MisleadingStats #UKPolitics

[Sacred Britannia @sacredbritannia]

🚨UPDATE : Not only may Keir Starmers social media ban be in breach of Article 8 it may now also be in breach of Article 10 of the ECHR.

And yes the ECHRs rights extends to children.

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

@andrewleedaly @PolitlcsUK Nope won't denie reality just to appese your empty brain cells

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

I can see this happening not that this is about protecting children,but parents silly enough to hand over their life for social media,phones,gaming etc their kids will just use those devices,so they won't parent,they will just be dumb enough to give away all their data.

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

@blixberrie Yep they use the kids as a weapon and a shield to deflect legitimate criticism

[Craftyartist @animatorforlife]

@blixberrie Though one they use emotive language, families that blame social media for their kids death and the government use them as shields as a weapon and deflection to any criticism.When we know the true purpose of why they want this.

[BanksyCat @Banksycat]

Today’s announcement isn’t a social media policy. It’s a DATABASE.

Your face. Your passport. Your biometrics. Tied to everything you do online. They just needed a reason you wouldn’t argue with.

Listen to what Starmer said today. “I will not present it as cost free.”

That isn’t honesty. That’s a weapon. You take the words right out of your critic’s mouth before they can speak. You say it first. On your terms. So when they push back they sound like they’re echoing you.

Politicians call it inoculation. They only use it when the plan was already done.

The man who funded the think tank that lobbied the ministers who wrote today's law stood in front of his own investors in 2024 and told them that citizens will be on their best behaviour because everything is being constantly recorded and reported.

That's LARRY ELLISON. Oracle chairman. The man who gave Tony Blair £270 million.

There is no version of this where adults stay anonymous. NONE. You cannot verify a child's age without verifying every adult's age. How does a platform know you are not 15? It doesn't. Not until you prove it. Every login. Every platform. FOREVER.

The child is not the target. The child is the reason.

Larry Ellison. Oracle chairman. The richest man on earth. He gave Tony Blair £270 million. Blair lobbied the ministers who wrote today's law. Those ministers met Ellison's people 29 times in 9 months. Blair's daughter in law was handed £500 million of YOUR money in May to invest in AI.

In 2024 Ellison stood in front of his own investors and told them that citizens will be on their best behaviour because everything is being constantly recorded and reported. Not hacked. Not leaked. Not exposed. Said it in public. On the record. Nobody leaked it. He VOLUNTEERED it.

This is his system. Blair sold it. Starmer built it. And they just told you it was for your children.

In September Starmer stood at a summit and said it out loud. You will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID. Nearly 3 million people signed a petition within days. The fourth largest petition in British history. He retreated. Rebranded it. Pretended it was voluntary.

Today he came back. This time he brought the children with him.

Here is the part that should stop you cold. This law was pushed through using powers that let ministers expand it to cover ANYTHING they want. No vote. No debate. No parliamentary scrutiny. The last time Parliament rejected one of these was 1979.

They didn't just build the infrastructure.

They made sure NOBODY can ever dismantle it and whoever replaces Starmer inherits every single piece of it.