@hvgoenka Sir ji, you can start that from your home. What was the point of bringing Hollywood reporter, robbreport etc to India..that too business in losses. You could have invested that money in startups setting up factories or new gen tech.
@BarrChris434772 So the director and story writer both are twisted sick persons to imagine and shoot so sickening content! To hide thier true nature they justify showing these movies in the name of revenge of a father! These sick elements are the ones who commit these crimes!!
@ARanganathan72@vikramsampath If it weren’t for social media and people like @ARanganathan72@vikramsampath , we would never know such dark side of those leaders. We have been taught how great freedom fighter he was and how secular.!!’
@UjwalKS Natural progress could have started in 70, 80, 90 and so on. US had these roads in 60s. The pace matters, intent matters!! Yes natural progress se toh kabhi na kabhi toh ho hi jata 2050, 75 tak toh ho ji jata!!
Dear Preeti Ji,
You are factually, conceptually and fundamentally wrong in your understanding of Sanatan Dharma and its festivals.
Factually Incorrect:
Raksha Sutra (रक्षा सूत्र) has never been restricted exclusively to a sister tying it to her brother. Our traditions recognise the sacred thread of protection across different relationships and contexts, including Lakshmi Ji and King Bali in a non-biological brother-sister bond, Indrani and Indra in the context of husband and wife, and the wider Guru, priest, disciple and ritual traditions.
The traditional shloka itself recalls King Bali:
येन बद्धो बली राजा दानवेन्द्रो महाबलः।
तेन त्वामनुबध्नामि रक्षे मा चल मा चल॥
This shloka invokes the sacred bond of protection associated with King Bali and is traditionally recited while tying the Raksha Sutra, asking that the protective bond remain firm and unbroken.
Therefore, you are factually incorrect.
Conceptually Flawed:
Even if a particular relationship were not explicitly mentioned in any scripture, nothing in Sanatan Dharma prohibits two individuals from tying a Raksha Sutra wherever there is love, affection, responsibility and a feeling of protection.
Whether between two sisters, an employer and employee, friends, or even a human being and a beloved pet, where the sentiment of Prema and Raksha exists, Sanatan Dharma does not require a verse explicitly prescribing that particular relationship before such an expression can be considered valid.
Hence, your conceptual understanding is also flawed.
Ignorance about Sanatan:
Perhaps your narrow and myopic understanding comes from being accustomed to religious systems that function primarily as rigid codes, where something must be explicitly written and prescribed before it can be considered acceptable or valid.
Sanatan Dharma is not a rigid rulebook written centuries ago and imposed unchanged upon every conceivable human relationship for eternity. It is a living civilisational and spiritual framework rooted in timeless principles, wisdom and values. It provides guidance and helps human beings find the right path according to their circumstances, relationships and responsibilities.
It is a guide, not a dictator.
One suggestion:
Before attempting to mock a tradition that you evidently do not understand, perhaps try studying it beyond the shallow narratives.
My best wishes to you.
#RishiToldMe
#MySanskritiMyIdentity
@PreetiChoudhry How come these mindless bimbos become Journalists!! She is scant understanding of Sanatan Dharma. Tieing of sacred thread is not restricted only to brother and sister..please read up!!
@_Adil_Waseem Oye bsdk hindu dharm ka apman kab aur kaise ho raha hai wo hum hindu decide karenge tum mulle nahi….and it’s not any disrespect to Hindu religion.