Britain had a moment of silence for George Floyd. Our politicians kneeled en masse to show their outrage at his killing. "I can't breathe" became a slogan.
George Floyd died on the other side of the world. He wasn't British.
Henry Nowak *was* British and his treatment by the police was shocking and negligent in the extreme. Yet there is no minute of silence. There is no coordinated public campaign. There is no kneeling at sporting events.
And we all know why.
During the summer of BLM, some people said "All Lives Matter". This was treated as the highest form of racism and anyone who said this was immediately cancelled. Why? Because the people in charge don't actually think all lives matter in the same way.
They have created a racial hierarchy of victimhood where a career criminal who died through mistreatment by police in a foreign country with 0 evidence of racism like George Floyd is automatically sanctified because of the colour of his skin.
And Henry Nowak, a British man, one of ours, is automatically dismissed and ignored because of the colour of his.
This is the ugly fruit of so-called "anti-racism", an obsession with race that has created a two-tier society which treats people differently because of the colour of their skin.
This needs to stop.
@HMRCcustomers I need my UTR as I need to make a tax return. But as I live overseas and my accountant tried to do this we don’t have the utr because it’s been 26 years since living in uk and they can’t settle on my last known address
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
Your grandmother vs you.
Same genes. Different food. One generation apart.
She rendered lard. You buy a cooking spray with dimethylpolysiloxane listed third.
She boiled the bones for eight hours. You buy a collagen sachet with a picture of someone doing yoga on it.
She ate the egg yolk. You bought the low-fat version that quietly removed it.
She fermented because preservation required it. You buy a probiotic because the sterilised packaging doesn't contain what the fermented food did.
She went outside because life required it. You have a vitamin D capsule and a SAD lamp for the depression that arrived when the outside stopped.
She put tallow on dry skin. You have a seventeen-step skincare routine and a ceramide serum.
She sat at a table with other people. You have a delivery app and a government Minister for Loneliness.
She was hungry and ate. You have a calorie tracker with haptic feedback.
She had none of the products.
She had none of the deficiencies the products address.
The deficiencies arrived with the products.
The products arrived after the advice removed what she had.
Don't Let Your Lives "Narrow"!!
I've been an orthopedic surgeon for 30 years.
The thing I watch happen to people, more than any injury or surgery, is refer to as the narrowing.
Most of my patients have no idea it's happening to them. They think it's just aging. It's not. 🧵
Having watched the been tonight I’m embarrassed to be British. Do we have an army or any means of defence? Our ship is finally on the way. What a fuck up
Sertraline again.
Grandmother Grace Uludag prescribed it for anxiety, ends up dead from 'accidental' overdose levels in her blood. Coroner says unintentional, NHS puts out another limp warning about serotonin syndrome and mixing pills.
Big surprise.
They still won't talk about the akathisia, that relentless, crawling-out-of-your-skin feeling that makes people desperate enough to swallow anything to make it stop. Or how these drugs get handed out like paracetamol while the MHRA sits on its hands and ignores every yellow card.
GPs keep prescribing, patients keep dying.
Enough.
When are they going to stop pretending this is rare?
Story: https://t.co/LvQEdvlkjw
You can't see it, you can't smell it, you can't hear it.
But a new study published in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine found that people living within 60 meters of a cell tower had measurable changes in their white blood cells, the kind of changes associated with chronic biological stress. Nearly one in four people in the high-exposure group had white blood cell counts above clinical reference limits. Over half of the people using their phones 4-6 hours a day had lymphocyte counts above normal... and most of them were under 30.
The researchers compared the effect to smoking.
And it gets more concerning. A second study found that EMF radiation alone showed no detectable DNA damage, but when combined with Hexavalent Chromium (the Erin Brockovich chemical), the result was a significant synergistic increase in DNA damage. Breaks that can lead to mutations, chromosomal instability, and cancer.
This is the same concept that applies to chemical disaster sites, to vaccine ingredients given simultaneously, to the toxic soup Americans are living inside of every single day. Study each exposure alone and it looks manageable. Combine them and the rules change entirely. There are no safety standards for mixtures.
HHS is now conducting a new health study on electromagnetic radiation. The FDA quietly removed its old webpages on cell phone radiation conclusions while that review is underway.
RFK Jr. has said it for years: Europe's EMF exposure limits are an order of magnitude lower than ours. There are over 10,000 studies documenting the effects. "You can't see, hear, or smell electromagnetic fields, but they're associated with systemic inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction, thought to be a root cause for many of today's chronic diseases."
The science is not settled. It never was.
📰 Full story by @smiddendorp22 here: https://t.co/fQqufXqTxV
Restore Britain’s policy on lockdown is clear. It was the darkest time in recent British history, a time where our freedoms were trampled over all in the name of bent ‘science’.
For some COVID, was a dangerous disease. And the full power of the state should have been deployed to protect those people. The elderly, the vulnerable.
Instead of spending hundreds of billions of closing our economy down, sentencing thousands of young healthy people to death and ruining tens of millions of lives - we should have protected those two groups, the elderly and the vulnerable, with everything that we had.
If we could shut the country down, we could have had protected those in genuine danger. Obviously.
Millions of youngsters had years ripped away from them. Lives destroyed. For what? To avoid getting a nasty cough?
Sweden was right. Tegnell was right. We should have followed their lead.
A Restore Britain Government would take steps to reverse the damage, as much as possible.
All criminal convictions for non-violent breaches of lockdown rules would be overturned and quashed. Nobody will have a criminal record for breaking laws that should have never existed in the first place. Every related fine will be refunded.
Restore Britain MPs will issue a formal statement and apology from Parliament, recognising the damage lockdowns caused to the families, businesses and our society.
The British state got it wrong. We will admit that.
Targeted amendments to existing laws will be passed, making it illegal to suspend basic freedoms without ultra-intensive parliamentary oversight and strict time limits.
Tax breaks to the most affected industries will be implemented - people forget that the damage continues today. Particularly for hospitality. We will help.
We will remove all remaining COVID relics from this country. Every social distancing sign will be torn down, every two metre sticker will be scrubbed away. I detest seeing it all.
An independent commission filled with overseas experts will be established to review all SAGE communications, predictions and data used to justify lockdown. We will ask Anders Tegnell to head that commission. We will release all modelling and all communications, unredacted, and aim to prosecute anyone who deliberately distorted the statistics to push a damaging pro-lockdown agenda.
Restore Britain will launch a full, independent inquiry into the COVID vaccine - how it was approved, and how it was forced on the entire healthy population. How did ministers like Reform’s Zahawi even dare to suggest that children can overrule their parents in order to take the vaccine? It is sick.
The current vaccine compensation scheme will be scrapped, and we will open a new system which speeds up claims, increases the amount paid and has no inbuilt bias. To those people who lost their lives because of the COVID vaccine, and there have been many, the state will properly compensate those families. Properly compensate.
And, for what is worth which is very little, the state will apologise.
Vaccine passports. Sick. Sick. Sick. The most evil policy inflicted on the British people - all supported by Conservative, Reform and Labour politicians.
I didn’t take the COVID vaccine, I felt I didn’t need it. That was my choice. I was prepared to have my life disrupted. Millions of others though felt blackmailed into receiving that jab to go on holiday or whatever else. Anyone involved in the implementation of that scheme should be ashamed of themselves - including many of the politicians in Reform's top team.
State workers who lost their jobs because of vaccine mandates will be properly compensated. What happened to them was wrong, and Restore Britain will fix it.
We will be honest with the British people about what happened in 2020 and 2021.
Lockdown was the biggest scandal of modern times.
Restore Britain will have the courage to finally admit that, and take steps to rectify the vast damage caused.
There is now a serious political party willing to face up to the truth. I hope you consider supporting us.