Olivia
Online
andrew mcgee
@asmcgee
Joined May 2012
2.2K Following
174 Followers
2.8K Posts
🚨 They Planned the 2020 Lockdowns to Secretly Bail Out the Banks With $6 Trillion Without Hyperinflation
They didn’t lockdown the world because of a virus. They locked you down because the entire banking system was already on the brink of collapse.
In September 2019 the REPO market exploded. Overnight lending rates spiked. Corporate loans and derivatives were quietly failing. There was no cash left in the repo market and in the system even through banks had Treasuries as collateral.
The Federal Reserve was staring at a full-blown liquidity crisis that could have taken down major banks.
Then, just weeks later, a “once-in-a-century” virus conveniently appears.
By early 2020 the Fed starts pulling hundreds of billions out of the REPO market… right as the first cases hit U.S. soil.
They shut down the entire economy.
Why?
Because if people stop spending, stop borrowing, and stop circulating money, the system can suddenly print $6 TRILLION and dump it straight into the banks without causing immediate hyperinflation.
The lockdowns were a financial operation.
While you were terrified of a virus and watching your business die, the biggest bailout in history was being executed behind closed doors.
The timing wasn’t coincidence. The scale wasn’t accident. The narrative wasn’t organic.
They needed you scared, isolated, and offline so they could quietly rescue the system that was already breaking in 2019.
This wasn’t chaos. This was the plan.
The famous City Of London banker @LordBelgrave already warned about how central banks, IMF and BIS have been planning the new monetary order.
Oil shock? AI crisis? Cyberattacks?
They’re already preparing for the next one.
THE BIGGEST LIE EVER TOLD
The IPCC has nothing.
Forty years of civilizational alarm. Trillions of dollars redirected. Energy systems dismantled. Farmers crushed. Children taught to fear the sky. Political freedom surrendered. Reproductive choices second-guessed. Entire economies rewired.
For nothing.
There is no empirical finding underneath any of it. None. Not one measurement, standing on its own, that would move a reasonable person to alarm.
The entire structure is manufactured.
Ask for one item. True without a model. Significant without a redefinition. Measured without extrapolation. Able to stand alone and matter to a parent, a farmer, a shipowner, an engineer, a legislator.
The honest inventory is three measurements. Not one of them means anything by itself.
CO₂ rose from 315 to 425 ppm since 1958. Plants grew better. Nothing bad happened that follows from the number.
Humans emit about 10 GtC/yr from combustion. A flux figure. By itself it tells you nothing.
CO₂ absorbs infrared on known bands. Water vapor absorbs far more. A spectroscopic line is not a consequence.
That is it. The entire empirical pile. Three measurements. Zero significance.
Everything else they have told you is one of three tricks.
Model output passed off as observation. Climate sensitivity. Airborne fraction read as retention. Revelle-limited uptake. Millennial persistence. Attribution of warming to forcing. Catastrophic projection. None of this is measured. All of it is what model code returns when they turn its crank. Model output is the model's assumptions integrated forward. It is not testimony from nature. It never was.
Definitional sleight-of-hand. Global mean surface temperature called a physical quantity. It is not. It is an area-weighted arithmetic mean of intensive readings with no thermodynamic referent. The 44 percent ratio of annual growth to annual emission relabeled as an airborne fraction and sold as retention. It carries zero information about retention. Fossil "dominance" quietly redefined from "nearly all" to "a bare majority" so the claim survives data that killed the real version.
Extrapolation sold as measurement. Tide gauges spliced to altimetry and projected as acceleration. Local pH drift at a handful of stations generalized to a planetary crisis. Arctic ice loss broadcast while Antarctic stability is dropped. Retreating glaciers paraded. Advancing ones hidden.
Strip the models. Strip the redefinitions. Strip the extrapolations. The pile is empty.
This is the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
The civilizational emergency has no empirical content. It was built by running trivial measurements through model chains and definitional swaps until the output read as apocalypse. Then it was broadcast as settled science. Then dissent was criminalized. Then careers were destroyed. Then children were terrified. Then nations were restructured.
For nothing.
The emperor has no clothes.
The pile is empty.
The alarm is a fabrication.
The greatest lie ever told to the human species was told in the name of saving the planet from a trace gas that feeds every green thing that lives.
That is the headline.
That is the story.
That is what you were never supposed to notice.
Now you know.
1934: Technocracy says water has value only when scarce. 1987: Brundtland says water is "not free." 2005: Nestlé's chairman calls a right to water "extreme." 2015: SDG 6.5 mandates "integrated water management at all levels." 2026: Goldman Sachs tokenizes water rights.
Your bill is up 62%. The documents said it would happen. Map it, meter it, ticket it.
Animated Mercator Vs The True Size of Each Country
https://t.co/yoP1N6zC2J
A large tree trunk has been uncovered beneath a glacier in the Alps, dated to around 6,000 years ago.
The species is Swiss stone pine.
Today, trees of that type cannot grow at that altitude because it is far too cold.
This means that when that tree was alive, the climate there had to be warmer than today.
6,000 years ago aligns with the Holocene climate optimum, a time when temperatures were far higher than now, even with far less atmospheric CO2.
Earth's climate is cyclical and Mother Nature self-regulates.
Narratives of doom serve political aims, not reality.
For the first time on record, the North Pole never made it above freezing this summer
https://t.co/87DXNFFK8E
Where exactly is the “climate crisis”?
Not in reported disaster frequency.
Not in weather-related losses as a share of global GDP.
And certainly not in human lives... disaster deaths have collapsed over the past century.
CO₂ increased. The planet warmed. Yet humanity became safer, wealthier, and dramatically more resilient.
These charts don’t prove climate never changes. They expose something far more inconvenient: the data do not support the relentless narrative of escalating global catastrophe.
No accelerating disasters.
No exploding relative costs.
No mounting death toll.
If your “crisis” disappears whenever the complete historical record is shown, you’re not presenting science.
You’re selling fear.
So get this…
There have been no hurricanes in the North Atlantic basin so far this year.
If we make it through Friday (9/11), it will be the first time in the satellite era (1966–present) that there have been no hurricanes in the Atlantic through this point in the season.
The avalanche-induced flood in Nepal last week was caused by the bedrock beneath the Yala Glacier collapsing, as confirmed by satellite imagery.
Why did it give way? It was likely already fractured due to past seismic activity because Himalayan uplift is being driven by plate tectonics moving India into the Asian continent.
It had nothing whatsoever to do with “climate change.”
Get your facts straight before running your mouth.
The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist.
An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it.
The office said they were using "well-correlated" neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie.
The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations.
When exposed, they quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only."
FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored.
Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards giving 2-5C uncertainty.
This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.
The surface of the Greenland Ice Sheet has gained more than 500 billions tons of new ice over the past year, which is about 150 billion tons above the 1981-2010 average, and the largest increase in at least nine years.
https://t.co/Ekp80rmuR0
Eric R. Weinstein’s “Great Replacement” by @JohnnyVedmore
At the turn of the millennium, the United Nations was busily trying to encourage economic migration to the Western world. However, encouraging unfettered economic migration as we are experiencing today is highly unpopular with native workers of the target countries.
The United Nations International Labour Organization in Geneva set up "the MIGRANT Division" to analyse and find solutions to these issues. To lead the unit, the UN appointed Manolo Abella to be Chief of MIGRANT, who is now linked with the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, the University of Oxford, and others.
Their stated challenge was to: “Find a free market solution to let employers reap the productivity benefit from decreasing their costs while boosting the income of native workers to the point where their interests become aligned with their employers.”
To achieve this goal they decided on a solution. They wrote:
“Native workers will not support programs which lower their total incomes. Yet, migration can be counted upon to produce a reliable net benefit in host countries only if it is allowed to decrease wages. Thus the solution is to realize that total income must rise while wage income is allowed to fall. This suggests that any natural free market solution must involve a natural income stream to host country workers which has previously been obscured or hidden. We then discover that if the (highly valuable) right of host country citizens to block access to labor markets is properly converted into a salable right, workers are made better off (since a salable right is always more financially valuable than a non-salable one). We thus convert the rights to preferential labor market access into rights of workers to license migrant work permits to employers. We find that with a little bit of care the market will now return an efficient solution with all parties being made better off.”
Essentially the UN decided that the democratic voters of a nation-state would oppose unfettered economic migration, as we are experiencing today, and the folks at this globalist entity believed they knew better. To achieve their goals, the United Nations needed to subversively introduce this agenda in an undemocratic manner without gaining the consent of the native citizens of the democracies that they were to target. The man they chose to analyse and map out this scheme, which many refer to now as “The Great Replacement” was Eric R. Weinstein, who has since become a central figure in the “Intellectual Dark Web” whose members include Ben Shapiro, David Rubin, Jordan B. Peterson, Sam Harris, Douglas Murray, Joe Rogan, and Eric’s brother Bret Weinstein.
@ericweinstein was employed by the UN to produce a document entitled: 'Migration for the Benefit of All: Towards a New Paradigm of Economic Immigration' Weinstein was aware of the damage which economic migration was to do to the native populations in places such as the United States and the United Kingdom. In one part of the document he produced for this nefarious United Nations agenda entitled, “Preference for migrants, undercutting of natives”, Weinstein wrote:
“When migrant and native workers of comparable value to an employer are asked to compete, it is to be expected that the employer will take the applicant who costs him/her less. If, however, the respective terms of employment of the native and the migrant workers differ considerably, the employer may develop a preference between otherwise equal candidates. If migrant workers are not permitted to seek alternative work in the host country, then their “company loyalty” is reduced to a matter of law and regulation. In such circumstances, employers know that they will not have to earn migrant worker loyalty with the expenditure of resources that would be needed in the case of native workers. Thus it is to be expected that in systems tethering migrant workers to their employer-sponsors, some migrants will out-compete natives of comparable or greater value simply by virtue of the terms of employment set by the MWP. Since this is precipitated by a rational market response on the part of native employers, this consequence must be seen as a natural, if unfortunate, by-product of direct migrant sponsorship.”
The Weinstein plan was always going to cost the government money, as we see unfolding today. A meticulous and proactive plan would have to be enacted by the nation-state in question to deal with the impact of large-scale migration and the author makes this clear in the document, with Eric R. Weinstein stating:
“In effect, the government would assume all the administrative and transport costs for a group of migrants, as well as calculating the additional external impacts of hosting them. To indicate these costs, the government would calculate the expected migrant impact cost as a function of the number of migrants. Such a function would be expected not only to grow as the number of migrants increased, but also to do so in accelerating fashion, because of concern for the environment, monitoring costs, societal stress, and security risks.”
The plan which was set out by Eric Weinstein predisposes the necessity of what he describes as “a much larger redistribution of native income”. The influx of migrants will always take wealth and opportunities away from the native population and this has a knock-on effect on how the “self-interested electorate” of the nation-state involved will vote.
“In the first instance, the tethering of migrants to employer-sponsors creates a non-market system with a host of inefficiencies, as well as the potential for human rights violations. Second, naively opening markets to migrants from lower-income countries can act as a kind of “tax”, redistributing native income away from workers and towards employers. Of course, it can be argued that any proposed redistribution is intrinsically neither good nor bad, yet such transfers can make it nearly impossible to reach broad consensus on many important migration issues within the host country electorate: rationality indicates that proposals which threaten to harm the majority of individuals are unlikely to be approved by a self-interested electorate.”
While comparing and analysing different methods of controlling the influx of migrants, Weinstein also studies the “Borjas Model” of economic migration and the predictable effect of its implementation on native workers, stating:
“Native workers in the sector concerned may experience none of the economic benefits of the migration programme. In fact, in the absence of any compensation measures, they may experience a
substantial loss of income, as the benefit to the host society stems from the ability to lower wages while simultaneously increasing the number of workers employed.”
The problems of “ghettoization” and issues relating to “long-term native shortages” are brought up by Weinstein as known consequences of the redistribution of income away from native populations, but at no point are these problems expressed as reasons not to force economic migration upon target populations. In this United Nations document, Eric Weinstein specifically pushes Marxist ideology concerning the redistribution of income and wealth which benefits economic migrants at the expense of the native populations.
Eric Weinstein proudly advertised his work for the United Nations on his website at the time, as well as posing himself as an expert on the subject. Under the title of “International Migration”, Weinstein even had a special email address for issues concerning migration where it was written:
“If you are interested in the creation of efficient markets for facilitating increased international labor migration, please contact me at [email protected] regarding the article 'Migration for the Benefit of All' to appear in 2002 in the International Labor Review.
It is a pleasure to thank the MIGRANT division of the United Nations ILO in Geneva for sponsoring this work.”
Whether you like him or not, Eric Weinstein has not been honest about his part in designing the failed Globalist system of economic migration which many people today refer to as the “Great Replacement”. He also hasn’t advertised his previous involvement with the United Nations, and his connection to Edge while it was fully funded by Jeffrey Epstein. During this time, Weinstein was also producing models for JP Morgan, one of Epstein’s keenest employers.
Find this article with source material at https://t.co/HMwrwaABJ0
I have also linked the original UN sponsored document produced by Eric Weinstein, entitled: 'Migration for the Benefit of All: Towards a New Paradigm of Economic Immigration' in PDF format https://t.co/TFjWiuexk3
Some basic science for you.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is 0.04% of our atmosphere.
Mankind's entire CO2 emissions are just 3% of that (0.0012%).
The UK's entire CO2 emissions are just 1% of that (0.0000012%).
So maybe, just maybe, something else caused this hot summer 🤔
#nufc we are so back 😍⚫️⚪️😂
Jaissle (YICE-LUH) we can boogie,
Seany Steur & Malik Thiaw,
Woltemade,
Lewis Miley,
Harvey Barrrrnnnneeessss 1,2,3,4
@JohanJnrRidley 👏👏
365 years of temperature data from central England, the world's longest running climate record, show no trend.
Despite a six-fold rise in population and a surge in CO2, January temperatures have barely shifted since 1600. Likewise for July, the hottest month of the year, temperatures are virtually unchanged.
The warmest winters on record happened in the 1700s, the 1800s, and the early 1900s, long before modern emissions.
Any warming is slow, natural, with the slight modern uptick likely linked to 1) the urban heat island effect, and 2) earth's gradual recovery from the little ice age.
If CO2 really controlled the climate, this chart (see video) would shoot up on the right, but it doesn't...
Europe’s red heat maps show the Urban Heat Island effect, not cLiMaTe ChAnGe.
Copernicus satellites recorded a land-surface temperature gap of about 23C between urban areas and nearby forests. In Belgium, the city of Brussels reached 47.4C (117.3F) while the adjacent Sonian Forest sat near 24.5C (76.1F).
Full breakdown (and more) in today's Substack: https://t.co/6Wkf3MSp5B
CO2 does not selectively torch France, chill Russia, and stall the High Arctic melt season.
Circulation does.
Full breakdown (and more) in today's Substack: https://t.co/DY8HA1jKBg
Many people in Europe seem to think it is hot because of A/C unit waste heat, but they’ll ignore the massive amounts of asphalt, concrete, and steel used to build these urban jungles they live in.
Below is a satellite-derived map of urban heat islands from Dr. Roy Spencer. I zoomed in on Europe. Much of the entire continent is urbanized to some extent.
🚨 BOMBSHELL FROM JAPAN — THEY CAN’T HIDE THIS ANYMORE
Professor Robert Clancy just dropped the receipts:
A massive Japanese study tracking 20 MILLION people found that ALL excess deaths were in the vaccinated group.
The unvaccinated group? ZERO excess deaths. And here’s the killer detail: mortality surges exactly 3 months after every booster — with peak deaths hitting around 100 days post-vaccination.
The pattern is undeniable. In my opinion, they can no longer suppress the information on the COVID vaccine. The data is out. The cover-up is crumbling. The world needs to see this.
Just in from NASA satellites: April 2026 was cooler than April 1998 despite a trillion tons of emissions.
Ask a climate hoaxer: If emissions cause warming and drive even more warming through feedbacks, how is that possible?
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Happy family 
Seen from Qatar
Santiago
Seen from Mexico
Azooo0
Seen from United States
LeHornySFX3D🔞 (COMMS OPEN)
Seen from Vietnam
Boy
Seen from Singapore
Dada The Straight Hunter
Seen from Philippines
AWIE
Seen from Malaysia
🇵🇰Islamabadians
Seen from United Kingdom
Chastity4u💋
Seen from United Kingdom
Community Dick
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.8M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.5M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.3M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.7M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers