Olivia
Online
andrew mcgee
@asmcgee
Joined May 2012
2.2K Following
173 Followers
2.8K Posts
🚨 BOMBSHELL FROM JAPAN — THEY CAN’T HIDE THIS ANYMORE
Professor Robert Clancy just dropped the receipts:
A massive Japanese study tracking 20 MILLION people found that ALL excess deaths were in the vaccinated group.
The unvaccinated group? ZERO excess deaths. And here’s the killer detail: mortality surges exactly 3 months after every booster — with peak deaths hitting around 100 days post-vaccination.
The pattern is undeniable. In my opinion, they can no longer suppress the information on the COVID vaccine. The data is out. The cover-up is crumbling. The world needs to see this.
Just in from NASA satellites: April 2026 was cooler than April 1998 despite a trillion tons of emissions.
Ask a climate hoaxer: If emissions cause warming and drive even more warming through feedbacks, how is that possible?
• Der Weltklimarat zieht sein apokalyptisches Computermodell als unrealistisch zurück
• 46 Klimawissenschaftler verlassen ihn als unseriös
• USA sind komplett ausgestiegen
• Bill Gates, Banken und WEF distanzieren sich vom Klimaschwindel
Hintergrund: Viele Jahre haben Computermodelle Greta Thunbergs Motto „Die Erde verbrennt!” genährt. Inzwischen ist der Abstand zur Realität zu groß geworden.
Die Bundesregierung hält jedoch an der Ideologie fest. Sie befürchtet, von den Wählern für die immensen wirtschaftlichen Schäden ihrer „Klimapolitik” abgestraft zu werden, wenn sie den Irrweg eingesteht.
Die SPD ist Garantiemacht für Habecks Politik der Deindustrialisierung, und die Union unterwirft sich: Jeder kleinste Versuch z. B. Katharina Reiches, den fatalen Kurs zu korrigieren, wird abgeblockt. Man finanziert alles mit überbordender Staatsverschuldung und hofft ... tja, worauf eigentlich?
Link: https://t.co/HIqeY8JqJ2
In a major development, the IPCC has finally admitted its apocalyptic RCP8.5 climate scenarios are "implausible", meaning most media scare stories over the last 15 years are officially junk, says Chris Morrison. https://t.co/XJHxDdKdAY
Hi Shelly.
Meteorologist here.
The map that you posted shows recent drought conditions in the U.S.
This is what you call “weather.”
Climate is long-term.
You should learn their definitions. They are not the same thing.
The plots below show U.S. percent of land area unusually dry (top) and Palmer Drought Severity Index (bottom) from January 1895 to March 2026.
The worst droughts on record occurred during the 1930s and 1950s.
Did “fossil fuel pollution” cause those?
🚨🚨Holy moly
Philippines infant mortality rose 37% after 20 years of steady decline.
Baby deaths exploded post-2020:
Congenital abnormalities +46%
Respiratory +124%
Infectious diseases +125%
Unexplained sudden deaths +106%
Happened right as COVID vaccines rolled out to pregnant mothers!
46 wetenschappers van het IPCC hebben hun ontslag genomen.
De reden?
Omdat er niet naar hen geluisterd wordt, omdat hun meningen afwijken van het gangbare verhaal!
Maar geloof me niet zomaar op mijn woord, hier zijn hun verklaringen:
Dr. Robert Balling: Het IPCC merkt op dat "er geen significante versnelling van de zeespiegelstijging in de 20e eeuw is waargenomen." Dit stond niet in de IPCC-samenvatting voor beleidsmakers.
Dr. Lucka Bogataj: "Stijgende concentraties koolstofdioxide in de atmosfeer veroorzaken geen wereldwijde temperatuurstijging... eerst veranderde de temperatuur en zo'n 700 jaar later volgde een verandering in de hoeveelheid koolstofdioxide in de atmosfeer."
Dr. John Christy: "Wat weinig mensen weten, is dat de meeste wetenschappers die bij het IPCC betrokken zijn, het er niet over eens zijn dat er sprake is van klimaatverandering. De bevindingen van het IPCC zijn in elk opeenvolgend rapport steevast verkeerd voorgesteld en/of gepolitiseerd."
Dr. Rosa Compagnucci: "De mens heeft slechts een paar tienden van een graad bijgedragen aan de opwarming van de aarde. Zonneactiviteit is een belangrijke drijvende kracht achter het klimaat."
Dr. Richard Courtney: "Het empirische bewijs wijst er sterk op dat de hypothese van door de mens veroorzaakte opwarming van de aarde onjuist is."
Dr. Judith Curry: "Ik ga niet zomaar mijn mening geven en het IPCC steunen, want ik heb geen vertrouwen in het proces."
Dr. Robert Davis: "De wereldwijde temperaturen veranderen niet zoals de meest geavanceerde klimaatmodellen voorspelden. In de samenvatting van het IPCC voor beleidsmakers wordt geen enkele keer melding gemaakt van temperatuurmetingen via satellieten."
Dr. Willem de Lange: “In 1996 noemde het IPCC mij als een van de circa 3000 ‘wetenschappers’ die het erover eens waren dat er een aantoonbare menselijke invloed op het klimaat bestaat. Dat was ik niet. Er is geen bewijs dat de hypothese ondersteunt dat een ongecontroleerde, catastrofale klimaatverandering het gevolg is van menselijke activiteiten.”
Dr. Chris de Freitas: "Besluitvormers binnen de overheid zouden inmiddels moeten weten dat de basis voor de aloude bewering dat koolstofdioxide een belangrijke drijvende kracht achter het wereldwijde klimaat is, ter discussie staat; en daarmee ook de tot nu toe aangenomen noodzaak van kostbare maatregelen om de uitstoot van koolstofdioxide te beperken. Als ze het niet weten, komt dat door het lawaai van de klimaathysterie, die gebaseerd is op de drogreden van 'argumenten uit onwetendheid' en voorspellingen van computermodellen."
Dr. Oliver Frauenfeld: "Er is nog veel meer vooruitgang nodig met betrekking tot ons huidige begrip van het klimaat en onze mogelijkheden om het te modelleren."
Dr. Peter Dietze: "Door gebruik te maken van een gebrekkig werveldiffusiemodel heeft het IPCC de toekomstige opname van koolstofdioxide door de oceanen ernstig onderschat."
Dr. John Everett: "Het is tijd voor een realiteitscheck. De oceanen en kustgebieden zijn veel warmer en kouder geweest dan wordt voorspeld in de huidige klimaatveranderingsscenario's. Ik heb het IPCC en recentere wetenschappelijke literatuur bestudeerd en ben van mening dat er geen probleem is met toenemende verzuring, zelfs niet tot de onwaarschijnlijke niveaus in de meest gebruikte IPCC-scenario's."
No one should be surprised but what he left out is that this turbine costs an estimated $50-80 million to build and install. It only produces power 35-45% of the time because wind is intermittent. Its output degrades 12-16% over its 20-25 year lifespan. It requires hundreds of tons of steel, concrete, fiberglass, and rare earth minerals mined largely in China (his favorite country). The other 55-65% of the time you need backup power, which comes from natural gas. And it exists only because of massive government subsidies.
A natural gas plant of the same 26MW capacity costs $26-39 million, produces more than double the effective output, runs on demand 24 hours a day regardless of weather, and lasts 30-40 years. Half the price. Double the output. No weather dependency. No subsidies required.
But this was never about the environment. If it were, you would care that rare earth mining for wind turbines devastates landscapes across China and Africa, that thousands of birds and bats are killed annually by turbine blades, that the blades themselves are non-recyclable fiberglass rotting in landfills, and that natural gas produces half the emissions of coal with none of these problems. You ignore all of this because environmentalism was never your goal. It is your vehicle. The destination is what it has always been: government control of energy production, which means government control of the economy, which is socialism. Rand identified this decades ago. The green movement is not a scientific movement. It is a political one, and its target is not pollution. It is capitalism.
Newton Rigg in Cumbria still feeds official weather data to the UK Met Office, even though the station closed back in 2021.
Newton Rigg is one of seven historic Met Office stations, 20% of the record, that either closed or never existed in the first place.
The Met Office claims these ghost stations are providing estimations from well-correlated neighboring stations, but some of those neighboring stations don't exist either.
According to the WMO, 80% of UK stations have errors of 2-5C, yet Met Office data reports temperatures to a hundredth of a degree.
This isn't science.
It's manufactured data built to serve a narrative.
a great day to share this graph
A large tree trunk has been uncovered beneath a glacier in the Alps, dated to around 6,000 years ago.
The species is Swiss stone pine.
Today, trees of that type cannot grow at that altitude because it is far too cold.
6,000 years ago aligns with the Holocene climate optimum, a time when temperatures were far higher than now, even with far less atmospheric CO2.
Earth's climate is cyclical.
Mother Nature self-regulates.
Narratives of doom serve political aims, not reality.
How NASA live footage works
There is something you have either ignored or haven’t updated yourself with, Water Vapour is meant to dissolve or disperse into the atmosphere far quicker than CO2. Currently the high amount of WV from the January 2022 historic Underwater Volcanic Eruption at Hunga Tonga that went into the Stratosphere remains, how much is anyone’s guess. WV is the most significant Greenhouse Gas, some twentyfold bigger than CO2. So, nobody is saying there isn’t any additional warming taking place.
Koudste temperatuur ooit gemeten in maart door Vostok meetstation op Antarctica: -76°C.
Msm zal dit niet melden.
Almost 80% of UK Met Office stations have error margins of up to 2C, with many as bad as 5C. Yet the same agency claims new records down to a hundredth of a degree.
Of the UK's 380 stations, only 14% meet World Meteorological Organization standards.
The rest sit beside roads, buildings or runways, places like Heathrow and St James' Park.
According to the WMO, almost half of UK stations are rated Class 4, unreliable, with a third rated Class 5, effectively junk.
These distorted readings feed climate emergency headlines and Net Zero policies.
Meanwhile, satellite and high-grade US datasets show only slight warming - a continuation of the post-Little Ice Age temperature rise. But those don't serve the narrative, so they're routinely ignored.
Great quote from @shellenberger:
“A gallon of jet fuel contains 34 kilowatt-hours of energy in a package weighing six pounds.
A lithium-ion battery storing the same energy weighs 250 pounds.
That density gap is why every military on earth runs on liquid hydrocarbons,
why every container ship crossing the Pacific burns bunker fuel,
why every combine harvester in Iowa runs on diesel,
and why every 747 landing at Heathrow runs on kerosene.
The fact that nobody wages war over solar panels is evidence of their limitations not superiority.”
Bottom Line: The laws of physics and thermodynamics are laws, not mere suggestions.
"There is no climate emergency."
That's the message from over 2,000 scientists and professionals worldwide, including Nobel laureate John Clauser, MIT's Richard Lindzen and Emeritus Professor at the University of Melbourne Ian Plimer.
They all say climate science has become too political, and that the models behind global policy are flawed.
Warming is far slower than predicted, they assert. CO2 is not pollution, it's plant food, the basis of all life on earth. And there's zero evidence that hurricanes, floods or droughts are worsening.
The World Climate Declaration calls for science over panic and prosperity through reliable, affordable energy.
"There is no climate emergency," say more than 2,000 scientists.
Your risk of dying from climate-related disasters dropped 99% since 1920.
This is because richer societies are much more resilient to disasters
Read more in my peer-reviewed article: https://t.co/CC0h7JKIKv
The UN claims "wildfires are on the rise all over the world." But this isn't true.
Satellite records from NASA's MODIS sensors track fire activity worldwide.
They show the area burned has declined significantly.
Between 1998 and 2015, global burned area fell by about 24% - a trend that has continued through 2025.
Long-term data shows the same consistent pattern of decline - fewer fires and less land burned.
The wildfire narrative does not match the data.
Inventing temperature readings from phantom weather stations and now inflating maximum daily temperature records. Do you see that the MET office are on a mission to fabricate evidence to justify Net Zero. They have to because it’s all a fraud being played on you
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.2M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.3M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.4M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.6M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.9M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.4M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.5M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.5M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.1M followers