@lottsanumbers@thinkingwest Pretty much the latter. It's well sourced, just very slanted. If you understand that it's intentionally a one-sided polemic, it's actually pretty good and informative. If you think it's straight history, it's baleful.
@Vertok55@thinkingwest Pretty much my take. It's excellent if you understand it as a corrective. It's terrible if you decide to make it your personality.
@MassJumbo I'm still technically undecided but, my first instinct was Becerra but didn't entertain the idea because of the polling and the jungle system. Swalwell dropping out gave people a chance to reset.