Those who look down at ʿulamāʾ—who spent their lives mastering the Qurʾān & Sunnah—and look up to engineer/physician-turned-“scholar” types with shaky fundamentals are typically driven by a postcolonial inferiority complex.
Isn't it funny that this poor fellow is backtracking and falling into the Mu'tazilī's shoes who, for the same Christian arguments, abandoned the Sunnah?
The Mu'tazilī considers you anthropomorphic and would disqualify you from challenging a Christian's beliefs as well.
The recent surge of Christian polemics—claiming that all Muslims share anthropomorphic beliefs—primarily arises from unqualified individuals of the Salafi/Wahhabi movement, who present their theology as representative of traditional Islam in Aqidah debates against Christians.
Q from student today
Allah made time and space so you said that's a proof He isn't in it. But a man can make a car then go in it.
I told him, the man who made the very first car... could he have made it inside of a car?
He laughed and said no way.
So likewise, and unlike people, Allah does not change. He is now as He was then.
Besides this sheep's bleat and conflation of ḥadīth qudsī attribution with quoting israelite narrations..
He forgets to mention how many insults his scholars hurled towards ours. Just 1 of his scholars suffices, namely al-Kawtharī. He insulted major scholars, including saḥāba.
@abuzaidtweet Politicians are deluded into thinking that they are wearing the hilltop crown and have authority over the affairs of us villagers worldwide.
To his demise, the amount of insults to the scholars of Ahlus-Sunnah one can amass from the books of the Ashʿarīs would require volumes upon volumes to cover.
No one is as cringe as this fellow here as to bring that to the table. We would bring insulting the saḥāba though.
Will we ever see him mention that? No, not really. It is clear that this boy's agenda is to use whatever thin straws he can clutch with his hands to try and sway the ignorant away from the scholars of Sunnah.
His entire agenda is to defame Ahlus-Sunnah.
@fawiddchannel@ojora Yes, I'm aware of how Twitter works, to an extent. I am replying to you overlooking what I mentioned above. He is giving a commentary, but for the sake of the argument, not because he does indeed have it with certainty that such a narration is authentic.
@fawiddchannel@ojora The problem is not with the taʾwīl, or whether this actually matches up with his usūl regarding the pronoun, or whether this ḥadīth indicates with certainty that Allāh has a face. The problem is the motive behind this taʾwīl, and it is very clear from the passage.
@fawiddchannel@ojora He is not rejecting it, he is genuinely unaware of its existence in those books. It is well known that al-Juwaynī and his student al-Ghazālī were not proficient in the science of ḥadīth, especially in their knowledge of the well-known ṣiḥāḥ.
@Qataaada أظنه يعتقد جهل من لا يعتنق معتقده و أن السبيل للمساكين الغير متنورين للوصول إلى معتقده هو أن يأتي الرسول ليخبرهم أن الرئيس الفيلسوف محمد حجاب قد أصاب.
حب الرياسة ليس حبا للسلطان فقط
@ShamsTameez@Muhamma55910196@abdul_now ركاكتك في الكلام وحدها تتبئ طالب العلم بمدى اطلاعك
أما سؤالك فهو سؤال فاسد قائم على فرض قيام الفعل بغير فاعله
الفاعل من قام بالفعل لا من أقامه بغيره
@AwaisKh69530473 There is nothing good about his agenda. I do not respect the ikhwānī ideology. He should not be respected, rather shamed for this agenda of his.
Apparently, everything disagreed upon between "taymis" and Ash'arīs is not a matter of consensus.
Is this man aware of half the nonsense he tries to parent young Muslims with?
Ash'arīs did not have 1 solid stance on anything they disagreed with Ibn Taymiyyah on to begin with.
Sincerely, abandon any custody of a child you might have to someone who is an adult and not a wannabe life philosopher.
Grow up from the entitled parent phase and get in line with the Sunnah. Thanks.
It seems that if al-Jahm postulated an idea, then there is no longer consensus upon such a belief.
Which side would you like to cease fire first, oh wise one? Should Ahlu-Sunnah remain silent while people like you speak? Or should we preserve rivalry and compete with evil?