He lives in a 1000 sq yard house in South Delhi with a large garden. Rent usually starts at around 7 lakhs per month for this in this kind of neighbourhood. He’s literally monetised contempt of court. Funded by whom? “Independent journalist”
My main Instagram account has been suspended. Then, just a while ago, it was banned in India by government order, with 103k followers. I've been talking about India-Israel relations and making pro-Palestine videos for a while. As well as anti-Hindutva videos and content on Indian politics, Islamophobia, and the RSS cult. I am not unique here; this is happening to everybody. And we can't just let it go. THIS IS NOT NORMAL. AGAIN, JUST REITERATING THAT THIS IS NOT NORMAL. THIS IS NOT OKAY.
This entire drama is being played out to pressure Meta to limit the reach of dissenting voices. Instagram has really shaken things up and annoyed the emperor.
You've all paid your taxes before the July 31 deadline. Now, with your tax money, the Govt has launched yet another campaign. These posters will soon be seen across the country.
Rahul Shivshankar wants to be Arnab Goswami so bad. He keeps trying to make controversial statements supporting the government but he's so irrelevant that he doesn't go viral like Arnab. You need to be more insane, Rahul. You're just Meesho Arnab rn lol
#RuchikaSingh Lets understand what is happening. It seems that there are two #RuchikaSinghs.
I have simply taken Two photographs Which were available On the Internet. I then asked the AI to generate similarities and differences between the two images.
The following are the results #MEDIA AND @noidapolice .
1. Estimated Age & Proportions (Assessment)
Subject A (Image 12, Left): Shows full adult skeletal maturity. Features are developed and defined. There is clear facial definition and skeletal structure.
Estimated Age Range: Mid-to-Late 20s.
Subject B (Image 13, Right): Shows pedomorphic (child-like) features, consistent with a pre-pubertal or early-pubertal stage. Features are softer, rounder, and have significant soft-tissue fullness, especially in the mid-face/cheeks. The jaw is not yet fully developed and defined.
Estimated Age Range: Early Adolescence (approx. 10–13 years).
The visualization effectively separates these two distinct developmental stages, showing that Subject A cannot be an older version of Subject B due to fundamental structural growth patterns, even over time.
Point-by-Point Difference Analysis (Anatomical Detail)
The visualizations in this section use illustrative metrics and tracing to compare stable features directly. These points are not explained by age or makeup.
2. The Ocular Region (Eyes & Sockets)
Subject A: Displays almond-shaped eyes that are set deeper. Subject A shows full adult bone development of the brow ridge, providing structure.
Subject B: Display rounder, closer-set eyes. Subject B shows less development in the orbital bone structure, consistent with young age.
Key Visible Difference: The distance between the inner corners of the eyes (intercanthal distance) is fundamentally different, and the bone structure of the orbital socket itself shows a different shape and projection.
3. The Nasal Morphology
Subject A: Displays a defined nasal bridge with a specific, narrower width. The nostril flare has specific definition and shape.
Subject B: Displays a wider nasal bridge and less defined nostril structure, consistent with less mature skeletal structure.
Key Visible Difference: The width of the nasal bridge and the shape/definition of the nostrils cannot be accounted for by maturation or simple variance.
4. The Auricular Morphology (Ears)
This is a critical area, as ears do not significantly change structure after early childhood and are a highly persistent feature.
Subject A: Displays prominent ears with significant lateral projection (flare) from the head. The structure of the helical rim and the ear lobe is distinct, showing a 'detached' or free lobe structure. (See Ear Detail in Image 10 analysis for a parallel).
Subject B: Displays ears that lie flatter and appear attached. The structure and orientation of the folds are fundamentally different.
Key Visible Difference: The structure and attachment of the ear lobes are not a result of development. Subjects display fundamentally different ear morphology.
5. Dental/Oral Formation
Subject A: Displays unique teeth formation and alignment. The visualization in Image 14 points to specific patterns, including crowding or rotation in the maxillary arch. These unique markers provide a high-confidence identifying signature.
Subject B: Displays a smooth dental arch with no complex visible features.
This is not a key differentiator for different people because B could have later dental work, but the highly distinct formation of Subject A is a potent identifier signature.
@ravishndtv@dhruv_rathee@NitishRajput@TheLallantop@ajitanjum@abhisar_sharma@BDUTT@ShekharGupta@TheDeshBhakt@ppbajpai@AajTak@ndtv@IndiaToday@ABPNews@ZeeNews@republic@TimesNow@News18India@indiatvnews@news24tvchannel@ANI@PTI_News@ians_india@NewsX
India no longer has the lowest Environmental Performance rating in the world.
They're now in 176th place out of 177 countries, with new policies on renewable energy and climate change helping them get out of last place.
There's a special place in hell reserved for women who push other women under the bus for disgusting male validation. There's an even more special place for women like Deepika who throw girls out to the wolves to earn some money. Fkn deshdrohi.
There are hundreds of tweets doxxing women protestors, calling for violence against them but Delhi Police cares more about the aura and image of their supreme leader
🚨 HUGE! Delhi Police has written to X seeking the IMMEDIATE REMOVAL of DEROGATORY, MALICIOUS & DEFAMATORY content targeting constitutional heads.
Police have also sought the account holder's IDENTITY, login/logout records, preservation of the content, & a Section 63(4) BSA certificate.
We asked the Delhi Police to find her and put her behind bars for Abusing PM Modi
Delhi Police in turn sent us a Notice
Seriously? @DelhiPolice@HMOIndia@PMOIndia
Paid PR feels. Influencers posting the exact same content. Blaming parents for not instilling the right values in GEN Z. Ungrateful Gen Z using foul language for an elderly Prime Minister who has given his life for the country. Ending with: We love you Modiji
I think a dangerous precedent has been set. By openly using expletives against the honourable prime minister, the protesters have now opened a new era where the PM and his ministers will be justified in using pejorative terms for opposition in the parliament. No more civility from now on. That time is over. I think the spam should begin by referring to his opponent as “Pappu” or something. I don’t know. Eye for an eye and that.