@AFLPlayers One thing that can be learnt from this, is that in the scenario where a player has knowingly been reported for an offence, they are not allowed to do any media commitments during or following the game on the ground. Don't let your players potentially incriminate themselves
@Conquest48@AFL@VirginAustralia My point exactly. It's purely outcome based. if the scenario you describe eventuated, it's penalising a courageous mark/attempted mark. He was going after the footy purely and simple and had no intent of injuring an opposition player.
@_dustedknuckles@AFL@VirginAustralia Both my statements are just pointing it out, that it's more confusing than ever of what is, and isn't allowed. An outcome based, or 'duty of care' approach to determining a suspension or not is absurd. Russian roulette for every loose ball contest.
@1116sen@SENBreakfast So let me get this straight @AFL, you can get 2-3 weeks for conducting a football act, with no ill intent, all the while have no case to answer for intentionally trying to kick someone in the nuts behind play. Make it make sense PLEASE.