New research: Is AI making employers view labor as more of a commodity?
In a large online labor market, we find that post-ChatGPT, clients place less weight on signals of human capital and more on price when hiring.
@buonbababuon yes, good thing he called dibs on a paper on... critiquing Al Roth's work on Moral Economics through the lens of Hindu philosophy before someone else did
It's not just students using AI. A University of Chicago professor used AI to help produce over 200 papers so far this year, sparking concerns from other academics. https://t.co/IJ8Plapudz (gift link) @washingtonpost
There's a chaired, full professor at UChicago who has put out *200* papers in 2026 alone. And at least one has been submitted to a journal (so potentially many more).
They don't all cite each other though -- rookie mistake.
I saw someone post a dozen+ AI slop papers purporting to solve niche open problems. This is antisocial behaviour and worse than if the problems stayed open.
0 people understand the solution, and there is no readable writeup. Also, incentive for either is removed.
I'm a Program Chair for ICML 2027. We'd love any creative suggestions for a great conference! How to manage the explosion of AI slop and insane submission growth? How to manage reviewing? How to incentivize high quality creative work? How to reduce bureaucracy and overhead?
@alz_zyd_ my conjecture (ahem) is that the mathematization you describe is largely signaling and will reverse soon for obvious reasons. maybe ideas will become paramount again
@DarwinianVyas There may be eventually. But I think there's more self-restraint with journals, and the incentives are often different (e.g., many academic disciplines, like economics, are less volume-oriented than CS).
Calling the explosion of submissions at CS conferences the collapse of science is premature.
Most academic research operates through journals which are (currently) more resistant to the flood. If anything the flood is just exposing pre-existing flaws in the conference system.
what should we put in instead? hard to say but I think there's a bit not enough linear programming in mathcamp. everyone should study some basic LPs. like the assignment problem